United in this Summer transfer window

What's worst for me is, if we didn't end up needing LB coverage that much, Coentrao would have been usable as the 2nd mid we were after. No downsides and still have Fabio and Buttley floating about(I'd expect the latter on loan to the Championship in about a weeks time). I bet Fabio would have stuck to right though, with Evra and Baines/Coentrao available.
 
The champions are actively scouting a left-back, a high-class centre-back and a central midfielder (a process that has been ongoing since 2007).

Just the 6 years then! :lol:
 
What's worst for me is, if we didn't end up needing LB coverage that much, Coentrao would have been usable as the 2nd mid we were after. No downsides and still have Fabio and Buttley floating about(I'd expect the latter on loan to the Championship in about a weeks time). I bet Fabio would have stuck to right though, with Evra and Baines/Coentrao available.
I could be wrong but I think only League One and below can still loan players after the window has closed. The ability of Coentrao to fill in, if needed in midfield, makes it especially galling, I agree.

The moment I heard we had supposedly got him, I was seriously pleased. I think signing him, even for a season, would've seen us in such better shape for this campaign.
 
If anything, up until Madrid changed their mind, it was quite a brilliant move for a last minute gasp. Fantastic young player(arguable a better opportunity than Baines), could have provided cover in midfield, and it was a loan to buy, just in case he didn't fit the Premiership. To get that set up in such a short time was well done. Just a shame Madrid lost their target.


all valid points, but too late.
personally I'd be over the moon if had landed him here
 
Alot of PR work being done to repair the damage and make United look like they were clued up throughout the transfer window. Lets neatly forget the Woodward going home on urgent business saga and not signing anyone until the last day.
 
If we had got Coentrao as well as Fellaini then on paper it would have been a good transfer window - keeping Rooney and Nani and adding those two plus a couple of youngsters.

As it is, it's less the actual signings than the manner we have conducted everything this summer, which has made us look amateurish and incompetent at every turn. Fellaini will be a good player for us and I think he will surprise a lot of people, it's more the fact that we overpaid when he was available for less earlier this summer, and that we left it till the last minute, especially when we could've used a midfield presence against Chelsea and Liverpool, not to mention the player now having no preseason or anything with us to settle in.
 
Alot of PR work being done to repair the damage and make United look like they were clued up throughout the transfer window. Lets neatly forget the Woodward going home on urgent business saga and not signing anyone until the last day.

All of these damage limitation pieces are making the club appear worse in all of this, not better imo.

“but the club wouldn’t change anything we did in the transfer window".
is a stupid quote from a United source in that Henry Winter article
An inquiry was made to Bilbao, and a £26 million bid reportedly offered, but it became clear that United would get Herrera only through meeting the buy-out clause of £30.5 million.
“The fee was too much,’’ the United source said. “He’s a very good player but not a top, top player.”
So £4.5m was a deal breaker yet we paid £4m over Fellaini's release clause when he isn't a top top player. We supposedly valued Fellaini at £18 million and ended up spending almost £10m more than that.

Four weeks ago, United were also offered Mesut Özil for substantially less than the £42.4 million for which he eventually went to Arsenal on transfer deadline day.
This is also a shame if true.
 
If we had got Coentrao as well as Fellaini then on paper it would have been a good transfer window - keeping Rooney and Nani and adding those two plus a couple of youngsters.

As it is, it's less the actual signings than the manner we have conducted everything this summer, which has made us look amateurish and incompetent at every turn. Fellaini will be a good player for us and I think he will surprise a lot of people, it's more the fact that we overpaid when he was available for less earlier this summer, and that we left it till the last minute, especially when we could've used a midfield presence against Chelsea and Liverpool, not to mention the player now having no preseason or anything with us to settle in.

I think Herrera and Fellaini would have represented a good window. Most people don't think a left back was a priority at all.
 
All of these damage limitation pieces are making the club appear worse in all of this, not better imo.

is a stupid quote from a United source in that Henry Winter article
So £4.5m was a deal breaker yet we paid £4m over Fellaini's release clause when he isn't a top top player. We supposedly valued Fellaini at £18 million and ended up spending almost £10m more than that.

This is also a shame if true.


We could've got Ozil (£35m), Thiago (£20m), Contraeo (Loan) and Fellaini (£23.5m)... shipped out Young (£10m) & Rooney (£35m), and made a £30m loss. The team would've been better for it and there'd have been a freshness about the place.. not to mention all of those signings are 25 or under.
 
We could've got Ozil (£35m), Thiago (£20m), Contraeo (Loan) and Fellaini (£23.5m)... shipped out Young (£10m) & Rooney (£35m), and made a £30m loss. The team would've been better for it and there'd have been a freshness about the place.. not to mention all of those signings are 25 or under.

And what if Ozil took ages adjusting to our league, whilst Rooney smashed them in at Chelsea. Wouldn't seem such genius then.
 
We could've got Ozil (£35m), Thiago (£20m), Contraeo (Loan) and Fellaini (£23.5m)... shipped out Young (£10m) & Rooney (£35m), and made a £30m loss. The team would've been better for it and there'd have been a freshness about the place.. not to mention all of those signings are 25 or under.

Not sure if anyone would pay 10m for Young. Big Sam maybe but he's got Downing now to fulfil the 'underwhelming and overrated English winger' quota.
 
I
I think Herrera and Fellaini would have represented a good window. Most people don't think a left back was a priority at all.

I agree, Coentrao can cover midfield though which would give us some versatility.

Again the window isn't that bad on paper it's more just the manner in which we have conducted ourselves.
 
I could be wrong but I think only League One and below can still loan players after the window has closed. The ability of Coentrao to fill in, if needed in midfield, makes it especially galling, I agree.

The moment I heard we had supposedly got him, I was seriously pleased. I think signing him, even for a season, would've seen us in such better shape for this campaign.
I think I read Championship and below, I don't think I see Buttz going to League 1, tbh.
 
I

I agree, Coentrao can cover midfield though which would give us some versatility.

Again the window isn't that bad on paper it's more just the manner in which we have conducted ourselves.

Exactly. If you told me in June that we're keeping Rooney, signing Fellaini, and (now) resigning Nani, I would be happy. If we signed Herrera (or Ozil, or Thiago, or Fabregas) it would have been great. But as it stands it's not bad.. It's the theatrics that we did this Summer (which made us look like amateurish cnuts) that was hard to swallow.

If we get Herrera in January then I can forget about this Summer.
 
"There is a borderline in terms of what you would think is a good signing for United," he said.
"I see some values on players, like Hazard for instance. To me it was a lot of money. He's a good player, but £34m?
"What we're finding anyway, the climate for buying these top players - not just the transfer fees, the salaries, agents' fees - is just getting ridiculous now."
The United chief added: "In the Hazard deal, Chelsea paid the agent £6m. The (Samir) Nasri situation was the same.
"It's all about what you think is value for a player. I am not envious of those deals at all. We placed a value on Hazard which was well below what they were talking about. So if it doesn't work, well we're not worried about that."
Ninjafletch posted this quote from fergie on the hazard saga of last summer. I do find our valuations rather strange. We pretty much have our heads stuck in 2002 regarding player valuations. Hazard is IMO, one of the biggest young talents in the game.
 
"Huge resources to invest in transfers and wages", "no budget", "always in for the best players"


All these messages that the club have pushed... There is absolutely feck all evidence that they are true.


Our valuations of players is stuck in 2002. Hazard, for example, would have been worth every penny.


£30m for Fabregas haha
 
Utterly baffling we didn't go for Ozil. He would become our second best player instantly.
 
Ozil would have been our best player in my opinion. I think he's Germany's best player and they've got some fantastic players. It's crazy Madrid sold him. Other than Ronaldo, I thought he was their second best player. After Messi and Ronaldo I put him in that group of players fighting to be recognized as the third best, along with the likes of Iniesta, Bale, RVP, Suarez and Ribery. When you think of the impact the likes of Silva, Mata and Cazorla had coming from La Liga, it's scary how good Ozil is going to be in the Prem. He's technically better than those 3 and he's physically more suited to the Prem. I think he will be the best player in the league.
 
Productivity wise, is there much between them? I think Rooney is getting underrated because we all hate him now
 
We'd certainly have seen the very best of RvP if Ozil was behind him. That said, at least if RvP gets injured we can replace him with Rooney, who at his best is a 30 goal per season striker.
 
Sometimes you just have to look beyond the stats. Ozil can get the best out of players around him, he'd have made our attack absolutely Rolls Royce.

I haven't watched enough of Ozil to judge whether he is better or worse but Rooney has been doing the latter for most of his time here.
 
We have about 7 different players in the squad who are capable of playing ACM. None as well as Ozil but its still a squad game nowadays and you can't simply overload in one position whilst neglecting others.

Rooney
Kagawa
Welbeck
Young
Zaha
Nani
Giggs

Getting Ozil was quite rightly never a priority, its really our inability to lay our hands on a creative CM which really sticks in the throat.
 
This is exactly like not wanting RvP because we already had 4 strikers and it would affect Welbeck and Hernandez's development!
 
This is exactly like not wanting RvP because we already had 4 strikers and it would affect Welbeck and Hernandez's development!

No, because we have our second best player already playing there. It has nothing to do with development. When we said we were keeping Rooney, we shut the door on Ozil. If we had been ok with selling him, then we would have tried for him. Rooney is an entirely different proposition to Hernandez/Welbeck. He is an established world class player.
 
Sometimes you just have to look beyond the stats. Ozil can get the best out of players around him, he'd have made our attack absolutely Rolls Royce.

Rooney does the same tbh. I don't see Ozil over him as much of an upgrade. Plus Ozil is much less of a goal threat I think - I haven't seen the stats.