Ole's_toe_poke
Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2009
- Messages
- 36,846
Have we confirmed that left back yet?
You better sit down for this...
Have we confirmed that left back yet?
It's fecking unbelievable.
We spend the first month of Summer chasing Thiago without even putting in a bid, then after he decides do join Bayern we approach Barcelona to take another midfield off of them with an insulting bid about 50% below his realistic value. And we are talking about Fabregas, a player they don't want to sell and a player who doesn't want to leave, as he stated right at the end of July I think.
Any sane club would have given up by then but no, we follow up with a bid that's five fecking million higher and below what they initially paid for him, feck knows what we are expecting there. It gets rejected, we mumble some nonsense and move on to... £28m for Baines and Fellaini. £28m, a price that's £5m higher than what they originally paid for both. Not to mention that we bid the exact same amount for Baines the second time this Summer - why?
4 days before the window expires we finally realise that we might need to get some business done so we make a move for Herrera. He wants to join, he has a release clause that we could pay. What do we do? We offer them less money in spite of the fact that Athletic are never going to accept it. Obviously it gets rejected so we come back with 3 people who can't even sign papers for us on the last day of a transfer window, and then pull out of the deal with an hour left in the window.
And we obviously end up signing who? Fellaini, a player who has been available all along and even had a release clause below what we're likely to end up paying. No pre-season, no settling in with the team for him, why would we do that if we could wait a month and pay £4m more?
Oh, and did I mention that we also managed to approach Roma about a player they never wanted to and basically couldn't sell?
On the plus side, there's almost certainly no way the next transfer window will be worse. Right?
You better sit down for this....On the plus side, there's almost certainly no way the next transfer window will be worse. Right?
Next window, I fully expect us to be offered Messi and Ronaldo for 50 million and have Woody Wood Pecker lose out by haggling over 2.5 million
Apparently Woody is a Liverpool fan, so both probably.I'm a big believer in waiting until you have all the relevant information at hand before judging. Thus, I have felt it unwise to offer any decisive judgement on the clubs transfer policy, before the window shut.
So, what the fecking hell was that? We do nothing for the entire window before just scraping through a deal for a player who had a release clause several million lower than what we paid. Is this actually happening or is this some drunk Liverpool fan's dream?
If we had a proper level of class, we'd fix this disasterpiece tomorrow, first thing.So we offered an amount for Herrera which was lesser than his release clause to the tune amount overpaid for the afro-man. You couldn't make this shit up. Really feel for Herrera, Bilbao can be very ruthless to players who want to leave. Do we have a moral responsibility of sorts to go back in for him again in January?
If we had a proper level of class, we'd fix this disasterpiece tomorrow, first thing.
So we offered an amount for Herrera which was lesser than his release clause to the tune amount overpaid for the afro-man. You couldn't make this shit up. Really feel for Herrera, Bilbao can be very ruthless to players who want to leave. Do we have a moral responsibility of sorts to go back in for him again in January?
Yup, and who could blame the lad, really...Herrera will probably have sent a very strongly worded email to Edward Woodenspoon and tell him to not even bother. "feck YOU MUCHO!", it reads.
Okay. I can understand that. There is something a bit questionable about activating release clauses when you were involved in the discussions that led to them being put in place.Apparently Woody is a Liverpool fan, so both probably.
Seems like Moyes had a gentlemans agreement not to use clauses to snatch Everton players this season, and Kenwright turned around on him honouring that by fleecing us.
It could definitely be seen as unfair, or dodgy, some criticism was levelled at Pep for the same with Thiago, before they put all the extras into their deal, and went well above the release clause. I believe they paid 25 on an 18m clause, added a friendly too.Okay. I can understand that. There is something a bit questionable about activating release clauses when you were involved in the discussions that led to them being put in place.
It boggles the mind, should have had the lad picked out weeks ago, and met the release that we can *easily* afford.Why on earth did we wait until the last day before deciding the Spanish lad was worth a bid?
Despair. I do.
It might just be made up. But hey, its not stopping any of us into jumping into conclusions...
It boggles the mind, should have had the lad picked out weeks ago, and met the release that we can *easily* afford.
David Moyes does too little, too late for Manchester United's good
Dithering over transfers and last minute-scrambling before the window closed fall short of the club's tradition
Jamie Jackson
The Guardian,Tuesday 3 September 2013
David Moyes has found his first transfer window at Manchester United tough. Photograph: Martin Rickett/PA
To end the transfer window having bought only Marouane Fellaini for £27.5m, an embarrassing £4m more than the Everton midfielder's buyout clause, heaps unwanted ignominy on Manchester United and Ed Woodward, the new executive vice-chairman.
This was the summer that began with David Moyes being billed as the Chosen One as Sir Alex Ferguson's successor and Woodward proclaiming there were sizeable funds at the manager's disposal. Yet three months later Monday's 11pm deadline was only minutes away and Moyes and Woodward faced having no major signing to parade in a doomsday scenario that was averted by Fellaini's arrival, but with the deal to buy Athletic Bilbao's Ander Herrera having collapsed.
Against a bizarre backdrop of imposters supposedly posing as United representatives, Woodward had decided Herrera's €36m (£30.5m) buyout clause was too much and continued to haggle even when it was made clear the Basque club would not budge.
This all followed the earlier failures of United's transfer policy. At the start of the window Moyes told Woodward to target Barcelona's Cesc Fábregas and Thiago Alcantara, while some sections of the executive wondered how sorely the experience of David Gill, the vice-chairman's predecessor, would be missed.
When Alcantara chose Bayern Munich and Fábregas decided to stay at Barca, an answer began to emerge. To his credit Moyes was always conscious this would be the trickiest window of his tenure due to the surgery needed on the squad – two central midfielders, at least, were needed – and the challenge presented in attracting players now the Ferguson factor was gone. Yet the strategy adopted by Woodward appeared scattergun and formed on the hoof, at best, with furious United fans characterising it far more scathingly.
The move for Herrera occurred only late last week when Athletic's president, Josu Urrutia, revealed a €30m (£25.6m) bid had been rejected. Given what Woodward's research into the 23-year-old and Athletic would have shown, he should have known the offer would be knocked back. As the club use solely Basque players the logical conclusion was it would only sell if forced to by a bid for the full €36m amount of the clause.
Yet though Woodward continued to believe the player was over-priced, given the earlier failures over Thiago and Fabregas, a strong argument runs he might have decided that Herrera was, indeed, worth paying €6m more than United's first bid to ensure Moyes's midfield was strengthened.
Here, he might have learned a lesson from the earlier dallying over Fellaini. When Moyes finally decided he wanted the Belgian, the ploy the manager and Woodward came up with was to wait until his £23.5m buyout clause expired on 31 July and then try and buy him on the cheap. This was further confused by marrying the offer with a move for Fellaini's club colleague Leighton Baines in a barely credible £28m joint valuation that Everton described as "derisory" and "insulting", a description aimed squarely at Moyes as their former manager of 11 years.
That was in mid-August. Fast forward to this weekend and United were still pursuing the twin-offer approach despite all the noises from Goodison Park being that Everton's chairman, Bill Kenwright, was intent on keeping Baines but less resolute regarding Fellaini.
Only on Monday did Woodward finally decide to split the bids. Yet the £15m he proposed for Baines was rejected – probably because it was exactly, and bafflingly, the same valuation of the left-back turned down in the weekend's joint £40m offer – to leave United pursuing Fellaini, who finally arrived for £4m more than his release clause. Given Moyes, as the former Everton manager who signed Fellaini, had inserted the clause and knew the Belgian's contract intimately this does not seem great business.
Woodward, in particular, comes out of United's experience in the summer market bruised, having endured a tough baptism as the lead mover and shaker in the cut-throat arena of global transfer dealing.
As Arsenal's Arsène Wenger landed Real Madrid's Mesut Ozil for a cool £42.5m to throw off his mantle as ditherer-in-chief of the Premier League, Woodward – and Moyes – have been left with their hopes of making a marquee signing to begin his tenure as manager in tatters.
After Sunday's 1-0 defeat at Liverpool, Moyes claimed no concern if no-one was bought. This was avoided in Fellaini's acquisition, but he and Woodward will have to think seriously about January's winter window and beyond. A sizeable section of the United support took to Twitter late on Monday evening to describe their club as a laughing stock. Woodward and Moyes will be determined there can be no repeats in future.
Worst summer I can remember.
Fergie gone.
Spent most of the summer being rejected.
Made fools of ourselves on deadline day screwing up the one deal everyone wanted to go through.
Signed fellaini for 27.5 million. (Beautiful football here we come!)
All the while we watch arsenal sign one of the most gifted and technical footballers around.
I normally don't give much of a shit, but this has been a terrible summer.
Yep. I respect Arsene for this deal big time.We're a big club, not THE big club. Hope we realize this. Players have different options to go to, clubs have different options to sell to, what this summer has taught us that the time to act high and mighty in the transfer market has well and truly gone. Even Arsene realized the fault with his ways and actually bought a genuine world class player.
Yep. I respect Arsene for this deal big time.
But for arsenalYep, we get to see Ozil in the Premier League
Of all the Real Madrid players, he was the one I liked to watch the most. Ronaldo is a machine and all, but Ozil is so aesthetically pleasing to see play. I'd rather it was us buying him, but it will feel so much better beating an Arsenal team with Ozil in it.