Nick 0208 Ldn
News 24
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 23,721
Turd Sandwich has my vote. Supporters of Giant Douche should be ashamed of themselves.
But they're going to clean up politics?
Turd Sandwich has my vote. Supporters of Giant Douche should be ashamed of themselves.
Problem is that the centre as moved to the right, Ed's moved a bit left but not nearly as far as he'd like to if he could get a mandate.You dont think Labour is a party of the mainstream left? I agree Blair was much more centre than left wing, but I think MilliE has moved them back to the left again.
I agree.Problem is that the centre as moved to the right, Ed's moved a bit left but not nearly as far as he'd like to if he could get a mandate.
The Telegraph have been sending some emails out
Apologies for the stupid question - but if, say the Tories get the most seats, do they get first choice on asking people to team up with them, to take them above 50%? Or is it a case of whichever 'team' has the most seats in the end that gets the nod?
Oh dear, first the nasty defamations from the Murdoch papers, then the Sun essentially indirectly bribing people to vote Tory, and now this.
Right wing media seems genuinely desperate and shitting it at the prospect of a Labour coalition introducing controls on media ownership.
Who's your MP?I can't believe it but I'm actually toying with voting Labour. My constituency is a semi-marginal - Tories won by a healthy margin last time but that wasn't expected. Might be a lot tighter this time around. I had a long old think last night and decided definitely Green, today I just want that lightbulb head motherfecker gone! Still a few hours before I finish work, i'll probably flip-flop several times
I missed that, what are you referring to? I think the right-leaning press are also genuinely afraid of the damage to the economy and the ideological tax increases that a LabLib or SNP/Labour coalition would deliver.
They've changed the rules there - as long as you're queuing at 10, you can vote.Looking back to 2010: were any of you in a constituency where the polling station was forced to close the doors on scores of voters?
I don't know what provision has been made in the years since, but hopefully we don't see such controversial scenes again later tonight.
You wouldn't expect anything less from non-dom exiles the Barclay brothers, would you? Same for Daily fail. The Sun just support whoever they can get closest to then claim they won it..The Telegraph have been sending some emails out
Who's your MP?
If Google images is anything to go buy I can see why he's popular...Rob Wilson, Reading East.
I missed that, what are you referring to? I think the right-leaning press are also genuinely afraid of the damage to the economy and the ideological tax increases that a LabLib or SNP/Labour coalition would deliver.
I'm actually thinking the opposite and that the 'end to cuts' rhetoric will kick in at the back of people's minds.BTW, that is in essence why I have a feeling Labour are going to disappoint today, and why undecideds may ultimately plump for the Tories at the last minute. The centre has been drifting to the right for as long as I can remember - certainly since Thatcher - while Labour is now drifting to the left, and people can see MilliE is actually to the left of his party. Even if the drift is only slight, it still opens the gap between them and the public, and there is always the worry in the back of peoples' minds that once in power he will feel liberated to lurch further left than he dared during the election.
They're probably just party workers, rather than polling staff. They usually have a few party types hanging around- sometimes they ask you who you voted for and if they can have your used polling card to gather your details for their databases.Are there not rules against those helping with polling wearing badges supporting a political party? Never voted in person before and was a bit surprised by that.
Ah, that makes sense.They're probably just party workers, rather than polling staff. They usually have a few party types hanging around- sometimes they ask you who you voted for and if they can have your used polling card to gather your details for their databases.
SNP aren't going to be in a coalition full stop.They aren't going to repeat '79 and bring a Labour gov down.Why would the SNP accept a lesser role when it is their MPs which tip the balance?
They've changed the rules there - as long as you're queuing at 10, you can vote.
Oh dear, first the nasty defamations from the Murdoch papers, then the Sun essentially indirectly bribing people to vote Tory, and now this.
Right wing media seems genuinely desperate and shitting it at the prospect of a Labour coalition introducing controls on media ownership.
SNP aren't going to be in a coalition full stop.They aren't going to repeat '79 and bring a Labour gov down.
SNP aren't going to be in a coalition full stop.They aren't going to repeat '79 and bring a Labour gov down.
Nah, the Tories have to vote for trident, so it'll sail through. The SNP have pretty much said they won't vote for it but wouldn't stop supporting Labour just because of it.They are also not going to renew trident - which could bring the government down?
I'm not sure because to get lib backing it has to be 3 subs... tories are insisting on 4 so I can see a clear reason for them to vote against if its a 3 sub proposal.Nah, the Tories have to vote for trident, so it'll sail through. The SNP have pretty much said they won't vote for it but wouldn't stop supporting Labour just because of it.
Why is Lib Dem backing needed?I'm not sure because to get lib backing it has to be 3 subs... tories are insisting on 4 so I can see a clear reason for them to vote against if its a 3 sub proposal.
they insisted the decision was put back to join the last coalition - so I suspect they would want some consession to join another coalition and apparently it cant be delayed any further without having a several year gap with no nukes (like with the aircraft carrier)Why is Lib Dem backing needed?
Ah, sorry, I was thinking in Labour minority terms.they insisted the decision was put back to join the last coalition - so I suspect they would want some consession to join another coalition and apparently it cant be delayed any further without having a several year gap with no nukes (like with the aircraft carrier)
its all very strange (according to the odds on odds checker)Odds have shortened slightly today on Cameron to hang on.
An A-Z list of estimated declaration times:
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/05/06/election-2015-declaration-times_n_7220684.html
If there's a hung parliament as people expect does the case for PR become irresistible? FPTP justifiable if it delivers strong single party government. If it doesn't twice in a row does it look like it no longer works, strengthening the case for something more proportional? At least then the coalition that won would be more representative.
Oxymoron?its all very strange (according to the odds on odds checker)
conservatives massive favourites for the most seets
cameron now odds on with all bookies to be next PM
but Labour minority government still the most likely government
I just think if you accept the future will invariably involve coalitions the whole case for FPTP disappears. That's the ideological side of it. On a practical level, if large parties need small parties to form a government this time, small parties will have leverage to force the issue which is in all their long term interests - whether that's the LibDems, Greens or UKIP.Could go either way. If we end up with a situation where the Government isn't able to make the kind of decisions it needs to get things done, that may lessen people's appetite for making it the status quo. On the other hand if the Government ends up more moderate and constructive, people might want more.