UK General Election 2015 | Conservatives win with an overall majority

How did you vote in the 2015 General Election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 67 20.0%
  • Labour

    Votes: 152 45.4%
  • Lib Dems

    Votes: 15 4.5%
  • Green

    Votes: 23 6.9%
  • SNP

    Votes: 9 2.7%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 11 3.3%
  • Independent

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Did not vote

    Votes: 43 12.8%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • Other (UUP, DUP, BNP, and anyone else I have forgotten)

    Votes: 9 2.7%

  • Total voters
    335
  • Poll closed .
They are not always permanent residents here anyway and only avoid tax on overseas earnings. You know they pay £30k-90k a year, plus full income tax on UK earnings, along with CGT, VAT, stamp duty land tax etc...Many invest significantly and create loads of jobs. If you want to go for tax avoiders, go for the corporates that legally pay next to feck all here, like Starbucks, because of the way the EU tax treaties are structured. Seems to stupid to try and take a moral high ground to drive out individuals that benefit your economy. Singapore, Dubai, NY or wherever will happily take these people in.
Most of them will stay and pay up (yielding more £££). Those that don't like it can feck off (and renounce British citizenship if we move to the the US IRS position). Tories protecting privileged rich people as usual.
 
election_cameron_r_3259872b.jpg


How I feel about politics at the minute
 
There are plenty of moral reasons not to have nuclear weapons, but not financial ones.
You could spend twenty times as much on conventional weapons, yet would still have to surrender unconditionally to a nuclear-armed enemy.

Plenty of countries dont have their own nukes, we're one of only a few. We don't need to be spending £3b a year on them at all.
 
If you want to spend £3b less on defence then that's a valid opinion, but cutting the most cost-effective part of defence spending does not make financial sense.
It may be morally or politically desirable, but financially it isn't.
 
There are plenty of moral reasons not to have nuclear weapons, but not financial ones.
You could spend twenty times as much on conventional weapons, yet would still have to surrender unconditionally to a nuclear-armed enemy.
Trident isn't about not surrendering it's about being able to nuke back from an unknown ocean location after the country has been obliterated.
The other options are as a first strike weapon or to intimidate other countries
I think it's main purpose is to ensure we keep a place on the security council.
That said 100bn is not that much as less than £2k per person and presumably the system lasts circa 20 years so a couple of quid a week per person which is not that much in the grand scale of governmental spending
 
Plaid Cymru candidate compares the English to 'Nazis'

Plaid Cymru candidate Mike Parker says rural Wales had been invaded by 'gun-toting Final Solution crackpots'

08 Apr 2015


A Welsh politician was criticised on Wednesday for comparing the English to "Nazis".

Plaid Cymru candidate Mike Parker said that rural Wales had been invaded by "gun-toting Final Solution crackpots" from over the border.

Parker, who is standing in Ceredigion, West Wales, claims that English people had moved to the area to "escape multicultural communities in more urban areas".

He defended his remarks, saying: "Racism should never be ignored nor accepted, and should always be challenged and tackled".

Labour and Conservative candidates called on Plaid Cymru, the Welsh nationalist party, to remove Parker from the election process.

Huw Thomas, the Labour candidate for Ceredigion, said: "There should be no place in our politics or our society for such divisive and hateful language."

But Plaid Cymru defended Parker, who was born in Birmingham, over the comments which he first made in 2001.

A spokesman said: "Plaid Cymru has always worked against those divisive forces and we're very proud of our record in doing so."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/pol...-candidate-compares-the-English-to-Nazis.html
 
Trident isn't about not surrendering it's about being able to nuke back from an unknown ocean location after the country has been obliterated.
The other options are as a first strike weapon or to intimidate other countries
I think it's main purpose is to ensure we keep a place on the security council.
That said 100bn is not that much as less than £2k per person and presumably the system lasts circa 20 years so a couple of quid a week per person which is not that much in the grand scale of governmental spending

It could be precisely about that. The idea is deterrence of course, that it prevents you getting put in that position in the first place.
I'm not aware of any UK desire to carry out first strike or use trident as intimidation.
 
fecking Brummie Welsh bastards. Kind of jars with the Green's calls for restraint etc...
 
Most of them will stay and pay up (yielding more £££). Those that don't like it can feck off (and renounce British citizenship if we move to the the US IRS position). Tories protecting privileged rich people as usual.
Not sure it will yield more. More I've thought about it, the more I think maybe it will be neutral. No-one knows. Few left after the bankers' bonus etc...but add in the egregious mansion tax and maybe there is a tipping point.
Either way, Labour is now trying to moralise and score points from situations or individuals it happily accepted while they were swelling government coffers in their 13 years in power.
 
Oh and note the Tory vote is slowly ticking up slowly on the above poll:)
 
This "they had 13 years in power to do that" line pisses me right off. Like, if you didn't do something the last time you were in power, despite completely different people now making up the leadership and decision-making parts of the party, that means you can absolutely never implement it in future. Never mind that we now live in a completely different economic situation where people at the bottom end have had to endure large drops in living standards and services, so it may now jar far more greatly with the public that extremely wealthy individuals can habitually escape tax due to sleight of hand. This is what happens when parties lose elections - they go and figure out how they can win back public support.

Ashcroft's also polled some more Labour/Tory marginals, interesting results:

Marginals-VI-150408-1024x493.jpg

Somewhat counter-intuitively, the ones with the highest spike in UKIP support are also the ones the Tories are doing best in.
 
This "they had 13 years in power to do that" line pisses me right off. Like, if you didn't do something the last time you were in power, despite completely different people now making up the leadership and decision-making parts of the party, that means you can absolutely never implement it in future. Never mind that we now live in a completely different economic situation where people at the bottom end have had to endure large drops in living standards and services, so it may now jar far more greatly with the public that extremely wealthy individuals can habitually escape tax due to sleight of hand. This is what happens when parties lose elections - they go and figure out how they can win back public support.

Ashcroft's also polled some more Labour/Tory marginals, interesting results:

Marginals-VI-150408-1024x493.jpg

Somewhat counter-intuitively, the ones with the highest spike in UKIP support are also the ones the Tories are doing best in.
I'm talking economic policy and you know Balls was well in with Brown.
 
Stupid question time:
For some reason I have received 2 polling cards - one at my current address (at which I have lived for 1.5 years), one at my hometown address.

Elections at current address:
  • Election of Member of Parliament for [alpha]
Elections for hometown address:
  • Election of Member of Parliament for [beta]
  • Election of Councillor/s to [~beta]
  • Election of Councillor/s to [~beta2]
On the back it logically says "it is an offence to vote more than once at each election". As far as I can tell from the cards, these are all different elections (by name). Am I entitled to vote in all of them? Common sense tells me no but my body, my body is telling me yes.
 
Stupid question time:
For some reason I have received 2 polling cards - one at my current address (at which I have lived for 1.5 years), one at my hometown address.

Elections at current address:
  • Election of Member of Parliament for [alpha]
Elections for hometown address:
  • Election of Member of Parliament for [beta]
  • Election of Councillor/s to [~beta]
  • Election of Councillor/s to [~beta2]
On the back it logically says "it is an offence to vote more than once at each election". As far as I can tell from the cards, these are all different elections (by name). Am I entitled to vote in all of them? Common sense tells me no but my body, my body is telling me yes.
Weird, when you registered for your new one it should have taken you off the roll of your old address. Have a gander at https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote and see if you can get it properly updated so you don't get arrested :lol:
 
I'm quite pragmatic about the non-dom question. If the treasury advise that abolishing the status would raise revenue then I would abolish it, if they say revenue would fall, then I wouldn't.

What I am suspicious of is that now a handful of extremely wealthy individuals might now donate millions to a party in order to buy themselves lower taxes. That's not democracy for me.
 
On the back it logically says "it is an offence to vote more than once at each election". As far as I can tell from the cards, these are all different elections (by name). Am I entitled to vote in all of them? Common sense tells me no but my body, my body is telling me yes.

Did you register at your new council recently. Maybe the old council has not had the time to take you off the register yet.
Right thing to do would be to ignore the poll card from the old council (and the one from the new council as well in case you are planning to vote labour) ;)
 
Oh and note the Tory vote is slowly ticking up slowly on the above poll:)
The one up there is just a few Tories coming out of the caf closet. More interesting will be the national ones - as far as I can see the Tory say little except 'macro economic' policy is playing very poorly v Ed's 'play fair' on NHS, tax etc pitch.
 
The one up there is just a few Tories coming out of the caf closet. More interesting will be the national ones - as far as I can see the Tory say little except 'macro economic' policy is playing very poorly v Ed's 'play fair' on NHS, tax etc pitch.
You said yourself that Ed is lightweight. We don't seem to have the political heavyweights we used to like Ken Clarke, Thatcher, Brown or, er, Robin Cook. I saw the latter at Edinburgh airport once. He really is a poison dwarf and he had some younger woman with him.
 
You said yourself that Ed is lightweight. We don't seem to have the political heavyweights we used to like Ken Clarke, Thatcher, Brown or, er, Robin Cook. I saw the latter at Edinburgh airport once. He really is a poison dwarf and he had some younger woman with him.

True. I can't think of any Labour. For the Tories Hague looked like progressing to fit, but now he's wimped off, and under a cloud to boot.
I'm a bit loathe to say it, but Farage or Salmond?
 
You said yourself that Ed is lightweight. We don't seem to have the political heavyweights we used to like Ken Clarke, Thatcher, Brown or, er, Robin Cook. I saw the latter at Edinburgh airport once. He really is a poison dwarf and he had some younger woman with him.
Ed's Mr Fair Play is going down well (note Tories have swiftly dropped personal attacks - I said last week it was counter productive). Dave's catenaccio is losing him the election, you simply can't win by doing nothing and being defensive.
 
True. I can't think of any Labour. For the Tories Hague looked like progressing to fit, but now he's wimped off, and under a cloud to boot.
I'm a bit loathe to say it, but Farage or Salmond?
A load of my Scottish friends are actually anti-Salmond. People listened to him tbf though. Farage is unbreakable.
 
Ed's Mr Fair Play is going down well (note Tories have swiftly dropped personal attacks - I said last week it was counter productive). Dave's catenaccio is losing him the election, you simply can't win by doing nothing and being defensive.
What constituency are you in pete out of interest? Does your vote even count a jot?
 
A load of my Scottish friends are actually anti-Salmond. People listened to him tbf though. Farage is unbreakable.

50% are anti-Salmond, as lots were anti-Thatcher/Brown etc. He is a bit tenuous though, maybe we're just left with Farage.
For the thickies, that doesn't mean I actually support Farage, I'm merely assessing his status as a political figure.
 
50% are anti-Salmond, as lots were anti-Thatcher/Brown etc. He is a bit tenuous though, maybe we're just left with Farage.
For the thickies, that doesn't mean I actually support Farage, I'm merely assessing his status as a political figure.
He's not even an MP!
 
What constituency are you in pete out of interest? Does your vote even count a jot?
It used to be Dulwich (marginal) but it was rejigged to West Norwood & Dulwich, which is solid Labour (as is most of London proper). Our standing MP Tessa Jowell is not up for re-election, which is a shame since you can talk to her without seeing the usual politician's calculation going on behind the eyes ('is this person important?', 'is this a good use of my precious time?', 'can I move on to someone more influential?').
 
Tories seem quite desperate with their new Trident attack line, trying anything to shift the polls.
 
Weird, when you registered for your new one it should have taken you off the roll of your old address. Have a gander at https://www.gov.uk/register-to-vote and see if you can get it properly updated so you don't get arrested :lol:

Did you register at your new council recently. Maybe the old council has not had the time to take you off the register yet.
Right thing to do would be to ignore the poll card from the old council (and the one from the new council as well in case you are planning to vote labour) ;)

So you're saying I should definitely vote twice? I'll do it!

Cheers anyway.
 
Trying to be objective here but the Tories have been a clusterfruck so far - should soon start playing out in the polls.
 
Last edited:
It used to be Dulwich (marginal) but it was rejigged to West Norwood & Dulwich, which is solid Labour (as is most of London proper). Our standing MP Tessa Jowell is not up for re-election, which is a shame since you can talk to her without seeing the usual politician's calculation going on behind the eyes ('is this person important?', 'is this a good use of my precious time?', 'can I move on to someone more influential?').

You must have lived close to me then when I loved in London. I was in Herne Hill nr Brockwell Park.