Why should I do this?I mean you can setup your own domain and give yourself any email address you desire.
Why should I do this?I mean you can setup your own domain and give yourself any email address you desire.
Seems to work
This is glorious
Or like when the Thatcher government killed broadband. https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost-the-broadband-race-in-1990-1224784
Unions played a big part. Unions love nationalised industries because it is generally the Labour party that does it and the unions have always held massive sway over Labour. In the 70's they'd strike at the drop of a hat and often held the whole country to ransom. Read about Red Robbo - 500 strikes called by him in 30 months.I had one of those once....The RAC and the AA and Green Flag grew tenfold during the Government's ownership of BL.
What is really strange is that whenever the UK tried nationalised industries and companies, it never worked out happily. No idea why.
Unlike other countries in Europe whose nationalised companies thrived and prospered to the extent that they now own most of the TOC's in the UK ; most of the famous ' Red Buses ' in London ; VW became the world's largest and most profitable car manufacturer ; and there are plenty of other examples.
I think failure of state owned companies and industries in the UK was a particularly UK problem, and I don't really consider state owned infrastructure something to be avoided at all costs. It just needs to be done properly with the State as investors and owners but absolutely not as day-to-day managers.
Or like when the Thatcher government killed broadband.
https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost-the-broadband-race-in-1990-1224784
Sounds pretty sensibel.The objective was to give everyone ultrafast internet access but is a combined operation between all the providers like Orange, SFR, Bouygues, Scopelec etc. then by 2021 5G - and by the time 2030 arrives 5G and fibre will probably be out of date.
But it's not free.
Infrastructure is already there for them to do it anyway, what's the harm in them paying for it?No one seems to worry that our Marxist overlords will be using the provision of free broadband to spy on our every move?
No one seems to worry that our Marxist overlords will be using the provision of free broadband to spy on our every move?
I sure am, or at least I think it opens the door to overlords of any political persuasion spying on us.
No one seems to worry that our Marxist overlords will be using the provision of free broadband to spy on our every move?
Unions played a big part. Unions love nationalised industries because it is generally the Labour party that does it and the unions have always held massive sway over Labour. In the 70's they'd strike at the drop of a hat and often held the whole country to ransom. Read about Red Robbo - 500 strikes called by him in 30 months.
I would be more in favour of at least having a conversation about nationalising 'some' services if the Labour/Unions tie up was not currently getting back to 70's levels along with talk of undoing every law that limited union power.
Tories - Crap. Crap leader. 'Get Brexit Done' is a lie unless you want the disaster of no deal in December next year. Priti Patel is home secretary ffs.
Labour - Crap. Crap leader. Policies to tax big companies won't work. Wrong targets for nationalization. Second referendum unlikely to resolve Brexit. Diane Abbott would be home secretary ffs.
Lib Dem - Crap. Crap leader. Dodgy campaign tactics. Even if you think remaining is the right answer, just ignoring leave voters is a terrible idea.
Don't disagree with any of that.
So. Who would you vote for assuming you will vote.
Or like when the Thatcher government killed broadband.
https://www.techradar.com/uk/news/world-of-tech/how-the-uk-lost-the-broadband-race-in-1990-1224784
The whole thing needs massive reforms and even that might not be enough to save it.
Why did they nationalise the British car industry in the first place?
I think it was because it was fecked.
But the Thatcher govt. was also responsible for ensuring that there were computers in classrooms very early on. I remember a well-stocked computer lab in my school in 1981.
That's what I thought. Much easier to blame Labour governments though.
Well they kept it going rather than letting it die a death, I suppose. There was nothing much wrong with the cars, in themselves, it's just that they were put together by people who's only interest was going on strike.
I will probably slightly reluctantly vote LibDem as the best chance of beating the Tory in my constituency. The local candidate seems alright as well (as does the Labour guy).
I will probably slightly reluctantly vote LibDem as the best chance of beating the Tory in my constituency. The local candidate seems alright as well (as does the Labour guy).
That's pretty much what it comes down to for me, I agree a lot with the sentiments on the parties you have raised but essentially you have to vote for whoever is best at beating the Tories in your constituency.
What if its a shootout between Labour and the Lib Dems?
Then it should be on which candidate for Parliament you like more but will probably come down to which Party leader you dislike the least.
The government were instrumental in the tie-up of the Leyland companies. The individual car companies involved were not that keen but the government pushed for it. Those companies at the time were hopelessly inefficient. Bad management had had much to do with it as anything else. Also they were heavily unionised and plagued with walkouts. In a captured market of the empire days you could get away with crap product and union protectionism. But once we went into the EU the British car industry ran smack into the Italians, French and Germans. Leyland could not live with competition from Europe or eventually from Japan. The government nationalised to try and save it but failed.Why did they nationalise the British car industry in the first place?
That's not true. The industry was getting caned by companies with better manufacturing and design processes.
YoOu can not deny that the cars were poorly put together and the assembly workers were more interested in going on strike.
Of course I can. Why do you think they were striking?
Simplistic as ever.
His own membership voted him out, he resisted modernisation, which you, yourself sited as a reason for BL's demise.
You need to read more.
Labour just can't help themselves. They wanted to bail out Thomas Cook with taxpayer money for feck's sake. A travel agent... in 2019!
And yet when Japanese, Korean and Europeans started managing the car business those very same workers with the same unions suddenly became the best in the world. Yes there were changes in union laws, but they didn't make strikes illegal, better management made them unnecessary. Along with a host of anti-discrimination and workers rights laws which meant many wrongs that previously required strikes to right are now settled in the courts instead.YoOu can not deny that the cars were poorly put together and the assembly workers were more interested in going on strike.
And yet when Japanese, Korean and Europeans started managing the car business those very same workers with the same unions suddenly became the best in the world. Yes there were changes in union laws, but they didn't make strikes illegal, better management made them unnecessary. Along with a host of anti-discrimination and workers rights laws which meant many wrongs that previously required strikes to right are now settled in the courts instead.