- Joined
- Oct 16, 2011
- Messages
- 36,199
Grumpy enough to remind folk that the political wing of the Wankpuffins got 11.5% and their leader lost their seat.
Swinson losing was fecking glorious, a saving grace on a grim night.
Grumpy enough to remind folk that the political wing of the Wankpuffins got 11.5% and their leader lost their seat.
I have mixed feelings about Sturgeon (though I am planning on moving to Edinburgh and going full Scots Nats) but her reaction to that was very funny.Swinson losing was fecking glorious, a saving grace on a grim night.
I have mixed feelings about Sturgeon (though I am planning on moving to Edinburgh and going full Scots Nats) but her reaction to that was very funny.
What is this?
Johnson won the election fair and square. You can't protest every time an election doesn't go your way. All it does is push people further away.
I've no idea about their tax contribution in the UK, but all the estimates ( I say estimates because the Governments here have always taken great care not to publish the actual numbers ) indicate that the tax take from those immigrants who've settled here during the past 10 years ( that's ALL of them, not just those from the EU ) contribute very little tax because the overwhelming majority of them are in low skilled / low paid jobs, and therefore pay very, very little Income Tax if any at all, or are already retired and settle here from other EU countries.
Therefore, the net Tax and Soc Sec contribution to the State from immigration is almost certainly negative, although those working do contribute to an increase in the GDP and, therefore, can be credited with contributing to ' Growth ' as economists seem to measure it.
Which is very dangerous and leaves people open to manipulation.If you feel that you just don't get it, which is fine. However it is a real emotional attachment for a lot of people in this country, aside from people's families perhaps the most important emotional attachment.
Freedland nails it
Freedland nails it
I know Chris and he would have made a fantastic constituency mp for the town.I live in a Labour town that yesterday went Tory for the first time in 27 years with a 5,000 majority. The Labour candidate is well and truly blaming worries about what Jeremy Corbyn represented.
I voted for him as well. He came across really well. This is a Cecil Franks moment again. I hope this doesn't put him off. I agree about the I'm alright Jack scenario. Think there is a bigger middle class now and they want to stay there, so spreading fear easily influences them to think about themselves.I know Chris and he would have made a fantastic constituency mp for the town.
I genuinely despise my fellow Barrovians who believed the bullshit of Corbyn cancelling the Dreadnought programme which carried a lot of votes in this election. We have some of the worst child poverty in the North West, a hospital trust at breaking point which is never out of the news afyer failing after failing and food banks which are at bursting point. This "I'm alright Jack and feck everyone else" is depressing.
My 1 hope is Labour treat this a watershed moment and get their act together although with the party being so fragmented I'm not overly hopeful of that tbh.
There were 13,000 redundancies in the yard under Franks and a tory government when the it's always thrived under a Labour government and mp. Its just... Aargh bollocks, I give up, I really do DT, I'm dreading the next 5 years and fully expect the already wide gap of those who have and those who don't to grow massively, not just in Barra but across the country. I mean come on Boris fecking Johnson ffs.I voted for him as well. He came across really well. This is a Cecil Franks moment again. I hope this doesn't put him off. I agree about the I'm alright Jack scenario. Think there is a bigger middle class now and they want to stay there, so spreading fear easily influences them to think about themselves.
Freedman really doesn’t - I’ve never read such a load of garbage in all my life.
Starts by correctly stating that people rejected Corbyn. No issue with that. But why did they reject Corbyn? The same reason they have rejected every slightly left of centre Labour leader - the press absolutely annihilated him at every single opportunity.
So what Freedman is basically advocating is that the Labour Party needs to exist purely as a Tory-lite vassal if it ever wants to get elected. Any increases in tax, promises to invest in public services or increase the minimum wage are absolutely out of the question.
So my question is to Freedman, what’s the point? Shift to the right to get elected and then change absolutely nothing?
See, I actually know some “proper” working class people, unlike people like Freedman.
They didn’t get out of bed on Thursday morning to reject an increase in income tax for the richest 5% or a small increase in corporation tax. Many of them don’t really understand or care about Nationalisation (other than a few may “understand” it’s bad because the Sun told them so). They didn’t vote against a Green Industrial revolution.
They got out of bed on Thursday morning to “get Brexit done” and keep that lying, anti-Semitic, terrorist-sympathising, Jihadi-loving, Marxist, Communist, Queen-hating, security threatening racist out of power and give loveable rogue Boris his mandate.
I fully understand someone will be quick to label me part of the problem - well I’m not making excuses here. If you’re not appealing to these people you’ve got to get out and change that. You know the press will vilify anything a hare’s breath left of centre so your candidates/MPs need to be all over their local communities, proving they’re not the monsters the papers say they are.
If you want to come on and tell me I’m wrong feel free to do so, but go and canvass opinion in my hometown in Derbyshire, ex mining community, or many of the thousands like it, then tell me again what you think. Guarantee you’ll get a rundown of “the Sun’s greatest hits”
Freedland nails it
I tend to agree.Freedman really doesn’t - I’ve never read such a load of garbage in all my life.
Starts by correctly stating that people rejected Corbyn. No issue with that. But why did they reject Corbyn? The same reason they have rejected every slightly left of centre Labour leader - the press absolutely annihilated him at every single opportunity.
So what Freedman is basically advocating is that the Labour Party needs to exist purely as a Tory-lite vassal if it ever wants to get elected. Any increases in tax, promises to invest in public services or increase the minimum wage are absolutely out of the question.
So my question is to Freedman, what’s the point? Shift to the right to get elected and then change absolutely nothing?
See, I actually know some “proper” working class people, unlike people like Freedman.
They didn’t get out of bed on Thursday morning to reject an increase in income tax for the richest 5% or a small increase in corporation tax. Many of them don’t really understand or care about Nationalisation (other than a few may “understand” it’s bad because the Sun told them so). They didn’t vote against a Green Industrial revolution.
They got out of bed on Thursday morning to “get Brexit done” and keep that lying, anti-Semitic, terrorist-sympathising, Jihadi-loving, Marxist, Communist, Queen-hating, security threatening racist out of power and give loveable rogue Boris his mandate.
I fully understand someone will be quick to label me part of the problem - well I’m not making excuses here. If you’re not appealing to these people you’ve got to get out and change that. You know the press will vilify anything a hare’s breath left of centre so your candidates/MPs need to be all over their local communities, proving they’re not the monsters the papers say they are.
If you want to come on and tell me I’m wrong feel free to do so, but go and canvass opinion in my hometown in Derbyshire, ex mining community, or many of the thousands like it, then tell me again what you think. Guarantee you’ll get a rundown of “the Sun’s greatest hits”
Labour is historically unpopular. I think it is a massive error to assume the policies weren’t part of the result. And the left is only saying it because it helps them rationalise the outcome- the same kind of soft thinking that got labour into this mess. It has to be challenged IMO.We don't move back to the centre, that would be a mistake. The policy positions were immensely popular, corbyn due to the press coverage and the brexit position was not.
Again “it was the press” is a story the left tells itself to avoid asking difficult questions about the true popularity of their programme. Again, it is a type of avoidance that has to be challenged.I tend to agree.
I disagree, I think that was how the remain campaign successfully managed to frame the campaign for a lot of remain voters, but wasn't true of the reasons on the ground. Cummings and Elliot are adamant (and I agree) that had Banks/Frarage not got involved leave would have won by a much greater margin.
Yep. The policies were popular. The barrier was the brexit policy and the dislike of Corbyn due to the consistent negative media coverage influencing mainly low and medium engagement voters.We don't move back to the centre, that would be a mistake. The policy positions were immensely popular, corbyn due to the press coverage and the brexit position was not. We need a clean leadership now who plebs can get behind, keep the popular left wing policies, regain the core labour vote lost due to brexit, and instead of appealing to moderate tory voters or waffling lib dems by moving to the centre, you use the grassroots movements and the activists which have been pretty decent for labour in 2017 to go after the 35%+ marginalised traditional non voters, the types who were galvanised by the brexit leave campaign. knock door to door and bring these people into the fold and show them they haven't been abandoned.
Again “it was the press” is a story the left tells itself to avoid asking difficult questions about the true popularity of their programme. Again, it is a type of avoidance that has to be challenged.
Yes, because you really have the best interest of the Labour party at heart. Come off it.Again “it was the press” is a story the left tells itself to avoid asking difficult questions about the true popularity of their programme. Again, it is a type of avoidance that has to be challenged.
Totally agree. You said it better than I did.Its really not. It’s a challenge you have overcome, sure. I agree there is also little point moaning about it since it’s always been the way and always will be the way
However, to suggest the press doesn’t have a huge impact is clearly wrong. What Labour have to do is pull their socks up and figure out how to combat that without pandering to them
Yep. The policies were popular. The barrier was the brexit policy and the dislike of Corbyn due to the consistent negative media coverage influencing mainly low and medium engagement voters.
The problem is that that negative media coverage will likely persist for any Labour leader who is not centre or centre right. It is imperative for Labour to find a way to manoeuvre around that.
100% this. Their ideological bent will continue to see them lose again and again until they understand everyone who disagrees with them is not a racist, homophobe, sexist et al. You see it time and again, even within this thread the only people showing intolerance for other groups see themselves as maligned and victimised all the while clearly displaying disdain for groups of people.. The cognitive dissonance is astounding. It drove me from labour and clearer I was not alone.
100% this. Their ideological bent will continue to see them lose again and again until they understand everyone who disagrees with them is not a racist, homophobe, sexist et al. You see it time and again, even within this thread the only people showing intolerance for other groups see themselves as maligned and victimised all the while clearly displaying disdain for groups of people.. The cognitive dissonance is astounding. It drove me from labour and clearer I was not alone.
We don't move back to the centre, that would be a mistake. The policy positions were immensely popular
Labour was crushed.. How can the takeaway from that, be anything to do with popularity? Your message was spectacularly murdered by the electorate and your first reaction is to shoot the messenger.
"The trend line is the same". If you ignore the sharp increase after the Brexit campaign.As I've said above I think Banks and Farage harmed the Brexit campaign. The sharp increase after each decision is obviously worrying bit the tendline is the same.
Yes, because you really have the best interest of the Labour party at heart. Come off it.
See my previous post above for more detail.
Man at work has been asking us all to donate toys for children who won’t get anything on Christmas Day this year. He donates to Oldham.
He stands there with a tear in his eye (genuinely, he’s a nice man) talking about how Oldham expect to have 40,000 donated presents this year. They’d need 56,000 if everyone who needed one was to get a toy.
He has been doing it for five years. Talks about how every year it has gotten worse and worse, more and more kids needing them. Asking what’s wrong in society.
Voted Tory of course.
You need to win over people like me if you want a majority. So how about listening to what people like me have been saying, for once?
Welcome to Scotland. Good choice of city too. Other Scottish cities that I would recommend would be...I have mixed feelings about Sturgeon (though I am planning on moving to Edinburgh and going full Scots Nats) but her reaction to that was very funny.
Not all people that dont
Go and look at the demographics and tell me again there’s no mandate for Labours policies. There clearly is amongst under 40s and those with college/University educations
Are we going to allow our Politics to be dictated to us by the lowest common denominator?
I did. I don’t agree (a) because it doesn’t matter what the polls say about labours popularity in the aftermath of such a wipeout (b) perhaps individual policies were popular but the overall impression of the programme, taken together, clearly was not. Your post smacks of the same kind of wishful thinking about the electorate that got you into this mess.See my post above
Ha! Can we please stop with the over dramatic language. It's like reading a badly written Daily Mail article.Labour was crushed.. How can the takeaway from that, be anything to do with popularity? Your message was spectacularly murdered by the electorate and your first reaction is to shoot the messenger.
Mate, change the record. I’ve been arguing corbyn was unelectable against people like you for years and they didn’t listen. However if you think changing the leader is enough by itself, that the manifesto was this eagle of popularity being held down by the ball and chain of corbyn (c) Daily Mail, you will get wiped out again.Ha! Can we please stop with the over dramatic language. It's like reading a badly written Daily Mail article.
Of course it has to do with popularity. Its populism, just like Trump. Strange for you to think an election result has nothing to do with popularity of a leader.