Sheriff Tiraspol 0:2 Man Utd
See this is the sort of signing we need more of. He's hungry, disciplined and eager to improve.
Says it all that of our signings this summer he's head and shoulders the standout (so far).
See this is the sort of signing we need more of. He's hungry, disciplined and eager to improve.
Says it all that of our signings this summer he's head and shoulders the standout (so far).
Eriksen, on a free transfer, is now the heartbeat of this team.
I think this is more relevant, yeah.He's Lahm in the making. I disagree that he plays like Evra.
Love this kid. Bags of energy - always 100% left on the pitch.
I think this is more relevant, yeah.
Evra was ultimately very good at keeping wide and overlapping, and eventually became an attacking threat. That's not really Malacia yet, he builds play centrally which is never something Evra was required to do. Apples and oranges in my opinion, the only comparison is the sides they came from and their stature.
I think you're good mate The whole post was bang on the moneyI was wondering what the feck your problem was with that. And then the penny dropped.. good spot. I don’t know if I should change it or not
I am a bit suprised that he is receiving so much praise for today, didn't think, he did anything that really stood out, but the bolded part is absolutely true for sure. I also like the determination he shows. Lets hope he will become influential spreading that mindset around other players as well. We have many that lack in that department.Surprised how well he did on the right. But have to keep in mind opposition too with regards to if he can do that again.
Great signing and do agree we should target players like him for signing
I think, it is way too early to come to conclusions on that. I am sure, Evra was asked by Ferguson to play a certain way, just like Malacia is now being asked by ETH to play a certain way. Concluding this is because they are better at that, wouldn't be correct in my eyes. I am pretty sure, ETH is trying to make use of a relatively recent trend of inverted Fullbacks. Dalot makes sense in that regard. Not so sure about Malacia. Still think, he is more of a traditional wingback or fullback. But he certainly is young enough to learn a new role and gain more competencies.I think this is more relevant, yeah.
Evra was ultimately very good at keeping wide and overlapping, and eventually became an attacking threat. That's not really Malacia yet, he builds play centrally which is never something Evra was required to do. Apples and oranges in my opinion, the only comparison is the sides they came from and their stature.
Neville made the point but he came on Vs Brentford when we were down. Came on with purpose and energy. It was a start for that game. The game was done and he could have strolled but instead wanted to prove something. Took Shaw's placeI am a bit suprised that he is receiving so much praise for today, didn't think, he did anything that really stood out, but the bolded part is absolutely true for sure. I also like the determination he shows. Lets hope he will become influential spreading that mindset around other players as well. We have many that lack in that department.
It's not so much a conclusion as an observation. Malacia is playing nothing like Evra at the moment in my opinion. It doesn't mean he can't develop some similar attributes but at the moment there is no indication he is asked to play in the same way, and there's no real practical difference between not doing something because the manager tells you not to or simply being unable in terms of what we see as a style of play. Just seems a lazy comparison to me, not that it's massively important.I am a bit suprised that he is receiving so much praise for today, didn't think, he did anything that really stood out, but the bolded part is absolutely true for sure. I also like the determination he shows. Lets hope he will become influential spreading that mindset around other players as well. We have many that lack in that department.
I think, it is way too early to come to conclusions on that. I am sure, Evra was asked by Ferguson to play a certain way, just like Malacia is now being asked by ETH to play a certain way. Concluding this is because they are better at that, wouldn't be correct in my eyes. I am pretty sure, ETH is trying to make use of a relatively recent trend of inverted Fullbacks. Dalot makes sense in that regard. Not so sure about Malacia. Still think, he is more of a traditional wingback or fullback. But he certainly is young enough to learn a new role and gain more competencies.
Ha! Only just got it - was wondering the same!I was wondering what the feck your problem was with that. And then the penny dropped.. good spot. I don’t know if I should change it or not
Seems like we are on the same side then. I'd argue though, that there is a difference between not being wanted to do something (but being able if needed) and not doing something because you aren't able to do it. Sure semantics but in case something goes wrong, a broader skillset will always be better than a narrower one.It's not so much a conclusion as an observation. Malacia is playing nothing like Evra at the moment in my opinion. It doesn't mean he can't develop some similar attributes but at the moment there is no indication he is asked to play in the same way, and there's no real practical difference between not doing something because the manager tells you not to or simply being unable in terms of what we see as a style of play. Just seems a lazy comparison to me, not that it's massively important.
I found it interesting that Malacia first played as the width-keeping fullback in his first two games. Then he played more contained against Liverpool and Arsenal. Today he tucked in midfield, next to Casemiro once McT was subbed off and we needed someone to shuttle throughout the width of the pitch (Fred's role) and finally he played as the inverted fullback (which I think was more dictated by Ten Hag wanting to give minutes to Shaw than anything else).EtH might've stumbled onto something with Malacia in that right back role. He of course didn't play as an actual RB but more tucked in the way Lahm did at times under Pep. It looked great for our balance n he was very good on the ball there.
I think he's very good in possession. A little safe at times, but he isn't lacking technically.His attitude is spot on and defensively he’s sound, but he lacks vision and passing ability. Unlike some others he seems aware of his lack of passing so doesn’t try too much, but it’s an issue. He’s rarely in the right position when we’re looking to attack and when he is he ends up taking it backwards instead. He’s a very good option and a great buy at what we paid for him, but I’d like to think we can do better. Reminds me of a Gabriel Heinze kind of player, almost got it and very likeable but not quite there.
I think he's very good in possession. A little safe at times, but he isn't lacking technically.
Agreed. Not sure he has the acceleration of Evra, and he certsinly doesn’t have the dribbling ability nor Evra’s sheer capacity at his very best. He was everywhere. Good on the ball and plays it silky smooth though.He's Lahm in the making. I disagree that he plays like Evra.
Yeah I can agree with that. I remember the odd switch of play from him in one of our league games. Generally though I think he is playing according to instructions and pulling it off to the letter. Think he has it in him to be a bit more expansive, but is playing within himself a bit.He doesn’t give the ball away, I agree. I just want to see more from him as the season goes on if he’s going to become our new long term left back.