Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes, so how does that work out? How much are we getting in cash? What you're saying, it could mean anything valuing De Gea at £0 and Navas at £30m (we get no cash), to De Gea at £30m and Navas at £0 (we get 30m in cash).

Yep. What it doesnt mean is 30m + Navas. So how much Navas is in there in the 30m is anybodys guess.
 
Yes, so how does that work out? How much are we getting in cash? What you're saying, it could mean anything valuing De Gea at £0 and Navas at £30m (we get no cash), to De Gea at £30m and Navas at £0 (we get 30m in cash).

I thought it meant that we're getting 29.3M and Navas, rather than having to pay extra for Navas on top.
 

Journos are having a field day.


Yep they were all on the negotiation tables and just have witnessed how we asked for Benzema, then Ronaldo, Bale, Modric, James, Isco, Varane and tried again for Ramos....and ended up with Navas
 
It could be for Gotze or Andre Hahn or BS.

The only thing that I find intriguing is that Januzaj has gone on loan for NO fee. WTF surely we wouldn't do that unless we were getting something in return.
When that NO fee loan news broke, you always new the Reus link was going to surface. But his agents have been adamant he is staying...
 
Yep they were all on the negotiation tables and just have witnessed how we asked for Benzema, then Ronaldo, Bale, Modric, James, Isco, Varane and tried again for Ramos....and ended up with Navas
..and probably pay Real £22m for him too.
 
Considering they haven't got any credible information on our transfers this season. It would mostly be just opinions.

MEN have been the best by a considerable distance when it comes to Utd this summer.

I just think they're using common sense, doesn't take a genius to think we'd have gone after those players, it's textbook Woodward.
 
Fair, but others have reported the 30m to be in pure cash. No reason to believe Taylor over those

Absolutely not. It could be anything, and these hacks are all full of shit at one time or another (if not all times!).

I'm just clarifying how that tweet reads. The money includes whatever we pay for Navas and if true, no doubt we'll have got the losing side of that cracker. As usual.
 
The only thing that I find intriguing is that Januzaj has gone on loan for NO fee. WTF surely we wouldn't do that unless we were getting something in return.
When that NO fee loan news broke, you always new the Reus link was going to surface. But his agents have been adamant he is staying...
Its on...:wenger:
 
Yup. Whatever the silly rumour is out there it's probably right. Every one of them. Cause we're so silly as a club.

How is us enquiring about Ronaldo, Bale or Benzema a silly rumour? I'd be more surprised if we didn't ask after them.

This place is embarrassing at times "ALL JOURNOS ARE LIARS TALK RUBBISH HATE THEM GRRRRRR"
 
The only thing that I find intriguing is that Januzaj has gone on loan for NO fee. WTF surely we wouldn't do that unless we were getting something in return.
When that NO fee loan news broke, you always new the Reus link was going to surface. But his agents have been adamant he is staying...

I missed the "no fee" part, so yeah it's possible.
 


Martial does not have cost 80 m € has MUFC, but 50 m € (36 m£). What is already too (much). But bother to add! It suffices as a ca..
 
Sam Pilger (journo) is absolutely destroying us on twitter :lol:

Hard to argue with anything he's saying, mind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.