I mean it really isn't. Due to him not even being a journalist 'Artist and Digital Design Consultant for Gaming and Sport companies.' He mostly peddles NFTs and is just a liverpool fan.
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2022/23 | Follow the OP rules and check the quality of your sources before posting. STAY ON TOPIC!
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
- Status
OK, although journalists are not exactly paragons of truth themselves
Hence why a blue tick doesn't always mean reliable. But a blue ticked Liverpool fan who makes football NFTs may mean even less.
Well of course they are. They might be desperate, but we're desperately incompetent.
How many times are journalists going to write the same fecking story?
Just walk away ffs we don't want to be bailing them out and giving them a platform to become a force again anyway. Just buy Sangare and Vitinha for roughly the same fee and that's the midfield in significantly better shape.
Literally the entire point of selling him for feck sake. Shock horror I guess we are trying to sign him for the cheapest we can?
Stealing a living.
Well, yes. Amazing that anyone could take issue with that.
we have no money then
You can guarantee it'll be posted in here each time.
Because that's what these threads are for.
Our problem is we've never walked away from a deal in these high fee sagas. Now we're desperate and in an awkward position with it being an ex-player of our manager.
My fear is that we are stalling/holding out on getting the next few targets over the line. I have little faith that we are working on multiple deals simultaneously.
The same opinions and nonsense posted by aggregators? I'd argue otherwise.
I would take him. He still looks to have what it takes. A little worrying about the muscle in midfield if we brought in FdJ and Eriksen only.
Literally did with Sancho.
You don't need to argue, just hit that filter button. It takes seconds to check the tweet thread, I really don't know why people moan about it. The personal transfer thread is one to complain about, you get any old source in those.
Edit: Aggregators are no longer allowed. Report them.
we have no money then
Why would any football club buy someone who is barely a footballer but would demand high wages? He's going nowhere until his contract runs out.
Is there a filter button to filter our posts by ESPN repeating the same nonsense we've seen 10 times in here already?
I am sure he has a lot of suitors but hopefully he picks us. Our interest in him a couple of years ago might help.
It's by Rob Dawson, tier two. He just happens to work for ESPN
I'm not against him as the source, more the fact it was a nothing article that didn't tell us anything other than selling club wants lots of money.
Anyone posted the Ornstein tweet about Eriksen?
I wouldnt call signing no alternative and being in dialogue with them into the following summer walking away.
Some like to know every time a decent journo farts, others do not. I see your point.
we have no money then
Always had that feeling. We aren't going to spend big on FDJ and then sign another 2-3 players although it's bare minimum to get us back to winning again. We'll call it a "project" and "development" like we always do.
Fair enough. Hopefully the odd journalist could write something positive for a change and this thread will be a bit more cheery!
Throw it up
These Eriksen reports are promising. Good strong sources. I'd kill for a good link to a good DM though!
Eriksen isn't an alternative to De Jong.
- Status