OnlyTwoDaSilvas
Gullible
I didn't realise the buy back was only going to be for 2 years. That makes it slightly better, but still a deal I'm glad we stayed away from.
They've spent the past week negotiating for Reguilon only to lose out to Tottenham. There will be no movement this week, they need to return to the office and identify the next target.
We're so inept in the transfer market.
I didn't realise the buy back was only going to be for 2 years. That makes it slightly better, but still a deal I'm glad we stayed away from.
Well considering our long term planning the last few years was to give big contracts to Jones , Lingard , Smalling, Sanchez and Rojo maybe this short term deal might be a good thing.Because it’s incredibly short term planning. He fecks off for about 5m more than we paid.
Absolute non starter for any big club that doesn’t consider themselves a stepping stone
If he's remotely good in 2 years then they bring him back. Even if they don't plan on playing him but think they can get more than 40m euros for him, they'll take him back and sell to the highest bidder.
Essentially, spurs get to keep him if he's not very good.
Morata couldn'tI assume the player has to agree to that too though. If he's good, but not good enough to play for Madrid and is just going to be bought back to be sold for profit, then can he reject a move back?
I assume the player has to agree to that too though. If he's good, but not good enough to play for Madrid and is just going to be bought back to be sold for profit, then can he reject a move back?
Same type of posters who would also rip Woodward a new one if we were to get Reguilon and then lose him for a fixed fee if he were to become world class.
Madness
I assume the player has to agree to that too though. If he's good, but not good enough to play for Madrid and is just going to be bought back to be sold for profit, then can he reject a move back?
That's essentially a loan where you get to keep the player if he's shit....
Nah son, where have I attacked Woodward in my post? Learn to read.Same type of posters who would also rip Woodward a new one if we were to get Reguilon and then lose him for a fixed fee if he were to become world class.
Madness
What kind of shit deal is that?
What kind of shit deal is that?
If he's remotely good in 2 years then they bring him back. Even if they don't plan on playing him but think they can get more than 40m euros for him, they'll take him back and sell to the highest bidder.
Essentially, spurs get to keep him if he's not very good.
Nah son, where have I attacked Woodward in my post? Learn to read.
Imagine hes good and Madrid get him back. The player is excited, but Madrid actually have a better LB in mind and tell Spurs, you know hes good for you, so if you want him pay double now...
If you had read my recent postings before assuming my opinion on the matter you would know I feel Woodward is not the issue at all. Glazers sign the cheques, Glazers value money over club success.I’m saying......If we were to sign him & then sell him on after 2 years he becomes World Class and we sell him back for a fixed fee.
Then you’d rip Woodward a new one for including the clause
Woodward cannot win
Meh I would've been ok with it. I'd be ok with a few loan deals as it's better than nothing. Gotta get off your high horse sometimes if the market is difficult like it allegedly is right now. Loan deals are perfectly fine as a stop gap, certainly better than signing nobody and overplaying the talent you do have into getting injured. We need able bodies, 1 at left back and 1 to rotate with the attack. If not Reguilon, then get Tagliafico or Telles. Just anyone who can play left wing back, is left footed and actually rotate with Shaw (not Williams, not good enough for that), otherwise Shaw will break down really quickly and the season will go to shit. Same with the attack.
Short term thinking post Fergie has put us in a position where were still about 4-5 players short.Agree with this , especially the bold part... if that player improves the team in the short term then I don’t really see the point in getting too worried about how desperate it looks. The main thing is it makes the squad stronger.
Ole - "I want Adama Traore"
Woodward - "say no more fam".
Ole - "I want Adama Traore"
Woodward - "say no more fam".
Yep. People are arguing about whether he would displace Shaw. Thats not the point. Point is that Shaw will get injured if we have nobody to rotate with him for this upcoming crazy season (in fact it'll 2-3 crazy years until a more normal schedule, with the Euros this summer, and then World Cup in the winter in 22/23). So the exact thing that we need is short term depth for a few seasons, as our actual depth is too young and not good enough to be properly useful. Someone who can compete for a starting spot and just keep each other fresh without our team quality dropping when they're inevitably injured.Agree with this , especially the bold part... if that player improves the team in the short term then I don’t really see the point in getting too worried about how desperate it looks. The main thing is it makes the squad stronger.
I'm still checking this feed once every couple of hours and I'm really not sure why I'm bothering at this point. What an utterly useless cnut Woodward is.
Short term squad players isn't a problem though. Short term option for a key position when our squad wouldn't really benefit from that, yeah, but right now we need quality depth. We don't have it. Bayern won the Champions League, in big part helped by Coutinho and Perisic in on loan to be squad players.Short term thinking post Fergie has put us in a position where were still about 4-5 players short.
I'd assume so, but he was apparently keen on the buyback being in too as he doesn't want to give up on his dream of playing for Madrid. I think he'd jump at going back.
You guys ever had a Traore? Seems like every football club has had at least one Traore.A mad Traore?
His full wages? I don't believe that for a second.
But ultimately not good enough to be a starter here (in a stronger league) so we'll either take even more of a loss on him next window or lose him for nothing eventually. Especially because he's made it quite clear he wants to leave and not be a backup here. Well done, United. Another transfer masterstroke.Good, he's easily worth what we quoted Roma and would cost a lot more to replace when we have priorities elsewhere.