Jerome Boateng is open to playing in the Premier League (probably nothing new, but he said it directly to some Chinese news network).
Falk, however, states otherwise.
Falk, however, states otherwise.
Consider the context in this case. When Man. City started going after him, Valencia were in dire need of money and looking to offload players to make up for it. City went in and got him on that basis. Other teams don't necessarily need a talented yet unproven winger, and we probably weren't going to pursue him once City came in (Ferran would have rejected us anyways to play under Pep).Thats how much we paid for fecking Daniel James, feck me. That english tax is stupid. Ferran is a really exciting prospect, while James is...fast.
Announcement: Benfica denies any interest in Edinson Cavani (note: he was strongly linked to them by various media outlets in Portugal).
Translation:
More info on the Veltman transfer:
900000 pounds
Falk reinforcing Romano's update on Havertz:
So much for Chelsea's smooth transfer operation.
Exactly, there's no difference between them, yet we'll still appear to be the ones having a tougher time with the transfer.Same situation as us with Sancho, all about negotiating structure of the payments no doubt
Proof though it's only quick and easy when there's a release clause
Man City have a proper recruitment department. This is what it looks like.
Pep ruled out Sancho ages ago and this guy will probably be just as good if not better.
If you wish really hard, maybe.Man City have a proper recruitment department. This is what it looks like.
Pep ruled out Sancho ages ago and this guy will probably be just as good if not better.
Man City have a proper recruitment department. This is what it looks like.
Pep ruled out Sancho ages ago and this guy will probably be just as good if not better.
Consider the context in this case. When Man. City started going after him, Valencia were in dire need of money and looking to offload players to make up for it. City went in and got him on that basis. Other teams don't necessarily need a talented yet unproven winger, and we probably weren't going to pursue him once City came in (Ferran would have rejected us anyways to play under Pep).
You always have to consider the context in different situations; there are no absolutes when it comes to football transfers. Technically, I can name tons of English players, but you probably wouldn't find them useful for United. Daniel James is one of them (British, not English, but still relevant), and people aren't giving him a chance. Ferran Torres also won't be starting for City anytime soon; he's nowhere near any of Mahrez, Sterling, or Bernardo Silva in terms of productivity and consistency.Still, tell me one english player under 30 which starts for anyclub who you can get for that amount? English players are way overvalued, if we want to maximize our budget we should star clear. Unless is someone special as Sancho of course.
Why? Ole is not responsible for negotiating transfers.This transfer window will be Ole's first real test.
Promising young Spurs forward Troy Parrot will sign for Milwall on a season-long loan.
Man City have a proper recruitment department. This is what it looks like.
Pep ruled out Sancho ages ago and this guy will probably be just as good if not better.
Soon after Romano published his article about Oblak, he reminded eveyrone that Atletico have no intentions on selling him. This means that Chelsea can only pay the release clause amount (120 million Euros) or tap him up.Chelsea are also looking for a Kepa replacement
- Targets: Onana, Oblak
Chelsea have contacted Atlético Madrid about the availability of Jan Oblak, though it is likely that they would have to meet the Slovenian’s €120m release clause.
Romano replies pt. 2:
The Christian Falk reference is, yes. Regarding Kabak, I doubt Schalke would let him go given that he's a key piece for them. Also, Kabak hasn't expressed his desire to leave the club at this time, so this won't go too far for now.That is blatantly about Thiago to the scousers and Kabak & Van Dijk would ne some partnership too.
Yeah, I'll be honest I don't know what to do with De Gea. We can't keep De Gea and not play him on those wages. We can't also have Henderson and Romero. I like the idea of selling De Gea because even if Henderson has some struggles we have Romero who can come in. It's not like De Gea hasn't cost us points.
I also feel like De Gea is the most settled he has ever been and yet at his worst in terms of form. Herrera left already and Mata is on his way so he could be the only Spaniard left at the club. David Silva also leaving City and you would imagine they might socialise.
I think it's due to the calibre of the players we are after. We have a lot of promising young players coming through the academy.
Am I the only one who likes/rates Richarlison?
I feel he'd be a good addition to many a team, deceptively technical for a work-horse type style.
It is a concern admittedly, but surely there has to still be a player in there a t that age. It would be a pretty inexplicable fall from grace otherwise.
He is great, but at the price Everton would sell for, he would have to be a big sides marquee signing. Everton won’t be accepting 50-60 million anytime soon.
For lack of a better Tweet, here are quotes from Rennes president Nicolas Holveck on Eduardo Camavinga:
This was from an interview with RMC Sport. More reliable Marca article
I remember this dude spewing a lot of negative stuff during Kagawa and Mhiki's transfer.
He is irrelevant and has no source.
Totally agree on Richarlison, very good player who is strong in all areas pretty much but not a £70m player.
Eriksen I disagree on though personally, 28maybe he has actually peaked and I know will get slaughtered as he is of course a good player, but for me, I always thought he was massively over rated being mentioned as one of the premiership greats often. For me he was a clever technical player but definately not a stellar player for the premiership, would never have signed him personally and certainly not now.
You always have to consider the context in different situations; there are no absolutes when it comes to football transfers. Technically, I can name tons of English players, but you probably wouldn't find them useful for United. Daniel James is one of them (British, not English, but still relevant), and people aren't giving him a chance. Ferran Torres also won't be starting for City anytime soon; he's nowhere near any of Mahrez, Sterling, or Bernardo Silva in terms of productivity and consistency.
Soon after Romano published his article about Oblak, he reminded eveyrone that Atletico have no intentions on selling him. This means that Chelsea can only pay the release clause amount (120 million Euros) or tap him up.
The "old news" that Romano's referring to: https://www.theguardian.com/football/2020/jul/20/chelsea-kai-havertz-bayer-leverkusen
We can safely rule out Oblak to Chelsea, now. Onana is still probable, however.