How many strikers Inter wants?? They would be the Juventus of CF?Surely he’s just going to be sat on the bench again.
How many strikers Inter wants?? They would be the Juventus of CF?Surely he’s just going to be sat on the bench again.
If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
When Martial was out injured earlier in the season we struggled to score. Average was less than a goal a game.
If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
Don't know if he is ignoring it. Maybe just waiting for the right person. Paying 20M for Haaland is a bargain. Even if it doesnt work out.If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
I agree but as I said buying a 19 year old striker for me is not the answer. No matter how much talent Haaland appears to have he is still playing in the Austrian league. It’s still a big risk he can’t step up.
But saying that I can’t suggest an experienced option that isn’t going to cost £60m plus.
If we get Sancho as well our front line is a made up of 19 to 21 year olds. I think you need at least one experienced player in there.
So because we're buying a striker we're ignoring midfield? Maybe we plan to buy for both areas of the pitch?
Yes, our weakest part is midfield, but that doesn't mean we are OK in attack, either.Do we really need him? Our attack and defence is in good shape apart from possibly another LW. It's the midfield that needs beefing up. Everyone knows that. How much game time would he get and at whose expense?
Tier 1 Source for me, the guy who broke the Daniel James transfer a month before everyone. It makes sense if Sane leaves.
Tier 1 Source for me, the guy who broke the Daniel James transfer a month before everyone. It makes sense if Sane leaves.
Tier 1 Source for me, the guy who broke the Daniel James transfer a month before everyone. It makes sense if Sane leaves.
If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
If Sancho wants to start every game, City ain't the club for him. Their squad will only get more stacked due to their bottomless pile of cash.
Don’t fear City getting him. He ain’t a major upgrade on what they have. Sane probably is the superior player.
If Martial or Rashford get injured we are extremely light. However I think buying another young striker isn’t the answer.
Why are we focusing on buying a striker when we clearly need two midfielders and a RW. Ole ignored central midfield in the summer and seems to be doing it again.
Yes, our weakest part is midfield, but that doesn't mean we are OK in attack, either.
We severely lack depth in our attack. Any one of Martial, Dan James, or Rashford gets injured and we are screwed. Specifically for the CF position – Greenwood is a great talent, but he can't play week-in-week-out if Martial gets injured, and we will be seriously hurt. And Martial is quite injury-prone, so buying Haaland is a smart decision. Not to mention that he is a different kind of striker from Martial/Greenwood, offering options in attack depending on who we are playing and how we need to break down their defense.
Not sure why people think he will get limited football here. I actually think he’ll start alot. He is the no9 Ole probably knows and trusts the most out of him Martial and GreenwoodIs Haaland going to be happy/wise going from regular football to limited football at a bigger club though? Yeah it would be great for United to have him on board but no so good for him.
Not sure why people think he will get limited football here. I actually think he’ll start alot. He is the no9 Ole probably knows and trusts the most out of him Martial and Greenwood
Is Haaland going to be happy/wise going from regular football to limited football at a bigger club though? Yeah it would be great for United to have him on board but no so good for him.
Calm down, troops. They are working on midfielders, too. It's just that those may not be available in January, and we may have to wait till the Summer... Or maybe not, according to these guys:
Not sure why people think he will get limited football here. I actually think he’ll start alot. He is the no9 Ole probably knows and trusts the most out of him Martial and Greenwood
Why would they sell Maddison in January?
Haaland aside, nobody worth their salt is going to be available in January. I'm expecting nothing. Sancho just strikes me as a pipedream, I'm sure he's probably not ruled us out but the fact is come the summer, we won't be getting a clear run at him and I'd expect our rivals will be more attractive immediate options for him. Personally I see him at Liverpool, I can't convince myself otherwise. I think they'll sell Salah this summer.
How can Ole trust him when he doesn't even play for him? Is Haaland any better than Greenwood who's already proving himself at United?
Tier 1 Source for me, the guy who broke the Daniel James transfer a month before everyone. It makes sense if Sane leaves.
How can Ole trust him when he doesn't even play for him? Is Haaland any better than Greenwood who's already proving himself at United?
To replace a left winger with a right winger? And why would Sancho go back to City without the guaranteed playing time? Realistically Pep isn't really going to stick around for much longer beyond this season. I'd understand if Sancho was a local lad or something, but he isn't.
Haaland is not going to start in front of Martial unless Martial is injured or being rested. That's crazy talk
He played for him at Malmo. The last part is a bit of a silly question
Ha yes bit of a brain fart thereMolde*
Sure. If he proves himself the spot is his. I just meant - he will have to prove himself.In terms of being a player who is in the box and anticipating scoring chances. Martial just isn't that player. I would not be surprised to see Martial lose his spot to Haaland before the end of the season. Or Martial played as the 10 and a link player
We could of course play a 2 striker system too. But the type of finisher and in the box striker Haaland is, I can see him starting quicker than most think
No idea. Lots of Money? And we really need a good midfielder, ASAP? Sounds strange to me, as well.Why would they sell Maddison in January?
Tier 1 Source for me, the guy who broke the Daniel James transfer a month before everyone. It makes sense if Sane leaves.