Transfer Tweets - 2014/15 | Stay On Topic & No Blacklisted Tweets (see OP)

Status
Not open for further replies.
DesiBD said:
You're wrong, mate. Barca still own them, they have the players on their books. There hasn't been a single rumour about them not being able to register their loaned out players in the Spanish media, so I don't think they are losing sleep over this.
Click to expand...

Having a player on your book is different from having a player registered.

A player must be registered at an association to play for a club
as either a professional or an amateur in accordance with the
provisions of article 2. Only registered players are eligible to
participate in organised football. By the act of registering, a
player agrees to abide by the statutes and regulations of FIFA, the
confederations and the associations.
2. A player may only be registered with one club at a time.
3. Players may be registered with a maximum of three clubs during
one season. During this period, the player is only eligible to play
offi cial matches for two clubs. As an exception to this rule, a player
moving between two clubs belonging to associations with overlapping
seasons (i.e. start of the season in summer/autumn as opposed to
winter/spring) may be eligible to play in offi cial matches for a third
club during the relevant season, provided he has fully complied with
his contractual obligations towards his previous clubs. Equally, the
provisions relating to the registration periods (article 6) as well as to the
minimum length of a contract (article 18 paragraph 2) must be respected.
4. Under all circumstances, due consideration must be given to the
sporting integrity of the competition. In particular, a player may not
play offi cial matches for more than two clubs competing in the same
national championship or cup during the same season, subject to
stricter individual competition regulations of member associations.
Click to expand...
 
JPRouve said:
Having a player on your book is different from having a player registered.
Click to expand...
The thing is, they can't register new players. Since they still own Deulofeu, Denis Suárez and Tello, it's not a problem for them.
 
DesiBD said:
The thing is, they can't register new players. Since they still own Deulofeu, Denis Suárez and Tello, it's not a problem for them.
Click to expand...

They have been sanctioned according to the art.23 of the disciplinary code, and what is called a transfer ban is in fact a registration ban.
23 Transfer ban
A transfer ban prevents a club from registering any player during the period in
question
Click to expand...

Owning a player means very little, what matter is who registered the player this season.
 
kps88 said:
The majority of @Raoul's posts in this thread are either dismissing tweets or ridiculing other people's reactions to tweets.

And the irony is he is the OP. Seeing this thread turn into everything he hates will haunt him forever.
Click to expand...

Yes indeed. A bit of skepticism is appropriate to balance the exuberant delusions.
 
JPRouve said:
They have been sanctioned according to the art.23 of the disciplinary code, and what is called a transfer ban is in fact a registration ban.


Owning a player means very little, what matter is who registered the player this season.
Click to expand...
I looked up the sanctions and regulations as well a few months back as well as the official statements. Neither the club, FIFA or CAS mention this, but all the Spanish papers do: Barca are apparently allowed to offer their players new deals, sell unwanted players and recall players out on loan. The media may very well be misinformed, but I doubt it, since this case is a huge deal for them.
 
NL Max said:
Old news, it has been reported a while back by Rik Elfrink and Thijs Slegers :p

PSV has now confirmed it, but those 2 journalists are reliable and have their sources within the club.
Click to expand...

Would Memphis go to a club who aren't in the CL next year ?
 
Kill 'em all said:


Was this the embargoed part of the press conference? Very interesting quotes.
Click to expand...


He talked about it during the presser, especially the bit about having less travel during the summer tour. The transfer names discussed in the article are speculation by MEN.
 
langster said:
Seeing as he turned down Spurs because they weren't in the CL this season, I very much doubt it.
Click to expand...

That's the impression I get as well. He wouldn't move to a side not in the CL since he could just as well stay at PSV. If he moves, i'd imagine its United or PSG.
 
Raoul said:
He talked about it during the presser, especially the bit about having less travel during the summer tour. The transfer names discussed in the article are speculation by MEN.
Click to expand...
Alright, didn't catch the part were he said he's looking for players that in as his players. :) Thought it was something extra.
 
Raoul said:
That's the impression I get as well. He wouldn't move to a side not in the CL since he could just as well stay at PSV. If he moves, i'd imagine its United or PSG.
Click to expand...

Yup.

I think LvG really wants Depay, and I think Depay wants to come here, he has alluded to it in tweets and his relationship with LvG is well publicised, especially after last years World Cup. I think the Bale situation is the only thing that's making anyone doubt the deal will go through.
 
It would be a good sweetener for the Depay deal. No disrespect to Dutch football but I'm not sure if it would be a good move for Adnan.
 
devil in me said:
Be a good move for all concerned. Depay to us, adnan to PSV makes too much sense.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Dutch league would be a great place for Adnan to add a bit of consistency to his huge talent. Would love to see this exchange happen.
 
Acole9 said:
It would be a good sweetener for the Depay deal. No disrespect to Dutch football but I'm not sure if it would be a good move for Adnan.
Click to expand...
It would be great for Adnan. Brilliant Technical coaching into a role where he can be the main man as opposed to trying to get a place here.
 
Acole9 said:
It would be a good sweetener for the Depay deal. No disrespect to Dutch football but I'm not sure if it would be a good move for Adnan.
Click to expand...

Why not? Even though it's not as strong as it once was, it's a league that allows players to develop and go elsewhere when they are better prepared for the demands. It would be a good deal.
 
Would be very happy with that IF he gets regular football.
 
I would prefer a regular PL loan frankly.

Though Pereira and Januzaj going on loan to PSV won't be bad either.
 
Amir said:
Why not? Even though it's not as strong as it once was, it's a league that allows players to develop and go elsewhere when they are better prepared for the demands. It would be a good deal.
Click to expand...

I think he'd be better off playing at another Premier League club.
 
pocco said:
We must really not want Depay. He's basically there for the taking, could do the deal right now and yet still nothing. It's only a matter of time before Depay decides he'd rather be elsewhere if we're this disinterested.
Click to expand...
We probably have a deal in place already.
 
pocco said:
We must really not want Depay. He's basically there for the taking, could do the deal right now and yet still nothing. It's only a matter of time before Depay decides he'd rather be elsewhere if we're this disinterested.
Click to expand...
This Januzaj to PSV thing shows exactly the opposite. I think we're overconfident the deal will happen and we're just doing things at our own pace.
 
pocco said:
We must really not want Depay. He's basically there for the taking, could do the deal right now and yet still nothing. It's only a matter of time before Depay decides he'd rather be elsewhere if we're this disinterested.
Click to expand...
What makes you say that? We left Blind late as we knew we'd get him.
 
DWelbz19 said:
What makes you say that? We left Blind late as we knew we'd get him.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but doing it so late hints we looked at other, preferable options.

As for Depay, people are jumping to way too many conclusions considering it's only the start of May.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.