In this day and age all people seem to care about is which players have the most goals or assists.
You don't win without scoring so it is understandable that they have a lot of weight in these debates.
In this day and age all people seem to care about is which players have the most goals or assists.
Did Scholes really only get 55 premier league assists? Seems shockingly low
No doubt there's recency bias with Salah. I wonder if he'll be considered top3 by so many in 5-10 years time, but I guess a lot depends on what he still wins this season (way too many trophies for him compared to others in the top3) and what he does in the next 2-3 years.Salah? Must be recency bias.
You don't win without scoring so it is understandable that they have a lot of weight in these debates.
I said they have a lot of weight, not that it is the be all and end all.I guess Lukaku is better than Baggio, Bergkamp and Cantona then?
Baggio? What?I guess Lukaku is better than Baggio, Bergkamp and Cantona then?
Baggio got himself a total of 323 G+A in the Italian league back when it was the best in the World. (429 in all competitions) I get what you are saying, but he is not your guy to make that valid argument.I guess Lukaku is better than Baggio, Bergkamp and Cantona then?
Yeah, that's a load of rubbish, really. Don't mind someone putting him in the top 3 but most wouldn't have him in. Salah, Henry and Ronaldo are clearly better players than Shearer.Anyone not putting Shearer in must not have been alive in the 90s.