new episode coming out
https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/tiger-king-joe-exotic-new-episode-1234571336/
https://variety.com/2020/tv/news/tiger-king-joe-exotic-new-episode-1234571336/
It's way worse if she takes it and fails though. That's a real possibility even if she's innocent.
That's true but if you are innocent, the tendency is to want to jump up and down to prove it. If it becomes known that she declined a polygraph after having had a chance to take one, it just looks incredibly bad and will probably continue to fuel public sentiment against her.
I didn't miss it, that was why I replied. Bigger than what? The first episode was basically about how shit he treated everyone. He was a complete shitshow throughout the whole thing.Yeah they did gloss over stuff though.
They glossed over his terrible treatment of the animals.
They mentioned him shooting some tigers very quickly once near the end and that was it. It’s since come out that he’d often shoot animals.
They did actually gloss over his manipulation of vulnerable people. Although it was obvious to most they didn’t really highlight it.
Plus a number of other things that have come to light since.
You also missed out where I said ‘even bigger’, clearly implying he was obviously a cnut, so I’m not sure why you replied as if I was suggesting he wasn’t one.
I don’t get why you want to argue about thisI didn't miss it, that was why I replied. Bigger than what? The first episode was basically about how shit he treated everyone. He was a complete shitshow throughout the whole thing.
Of course he shot animals. It's common sense that if you're keeping a lot of animals you'll have to euthanize a part of them for various reasons. Normally you'd get a vet to do it but bumfeck America ain't doing that. Dude had hundreds of tigers, of couse they were treated poorly.
I don't know what more you want. Every one of those things were showed. Not just talked about (expect the shooting) but showed. I watched the whole thing thinking this guy is one of the craziest people I've seen. He knew it himself. Said so at the end that he was a piece of shit for everything he's done. Bitter of course because he wanted everyone to go down with him.
I'm not arguing, I'm just wondering why you think it was glossed over when it was all there. I don't understand why you don't think that it didn't show him to be a massive piece of shit.I don’t get why you want to argue about this
Especially with such bad points.
I think he was a bigger cnut than what was portrayed in the doco. More information has come to light since from people involved and that so many people feel sorry for him at the end is why. That’s it. It clearly glossed over the mistreatment, despite it being mentioned.
Also it’s not just dying animals he killed. There’s a video in this very thread talking about it. He shot a tiger because he didn’t like it. And someone’s horse he promised to look after.
I do think that. I've been saying that all along. I also think it over just how big of one he was.I'm not arguing, I'm just wondering why you think it was glossed over when it was all there. I don't understand why you don't think that it didn't show him to be a massive piece of shit.
I guess we have just different barometeres for rating shits then.I do think that. I've been saying that all along. I also think it over just how big of one he was.
I don't think you're quite getting it. It's obvious he was all the things portrayed in the documentary. They only mention some things once or twice though, then swiftly moved on. The point isn't what conclusion you came to from that, but the focus. They also didn't mention some things that would have made him look even worse, hence he's an even bigger cnut than what it shows. I really don't think there's anything to prove me wrong about.I guess we have just different barometeres for rating shits then.
I liked how when he was paying for his gun ammo he was casually asked "Do you need any explosives with that?". 'Merica is a bizarre yet fascinating place.
This is actually his own zoo promo video. Kind of highlights the gulf between the US and the rest of the western world on many issues and what happens when you let idiots do what they want
My nightmare is living in those areas because of the crazy people there.It's like a different world, especially those redneck areas.
Really highlights what a weird place America is. The difference between those places and the major cities is crazy. Is there anywhere in the world with a wider spectrum of people and places?It's like a different world, especially those redneck areas.
My nightmare is living in those areas because of the crazy people there.
Really highlights what a weird place America is. The difference between those places and the major cities is crazy. Is there anywhere in the world with a wider spectrum of people and places?
What is actually the difference between what Carole is doing and what Joe and Doc are doing?
I think the main difference is that Carole doesn't let people pet the cubs. She's still horrible for keeping those animals in small enclosures and playing it off as if she's saving them though, while still profiting off visitors. Not to mention the whole husband murdering thing.Started watching it today, it’s insane. What is actually the difference between what Carole is doing and what Joe and Doc are doing?
I'm not arguing, I'm just wondering why you think it was glossed over when it was all there. I don't understand why you don't think that it didn't show him to be a massive piece of shit.
People that feel sorry for him are weird. You have to release the doc sometime and it did end by saying that the FBI weren't done and then the closing captions said that Doc Antle got raided by the FBI but he wasn't as interesting as Joe and not the focus to no point on going more on about it. I'm sure there are weirdos that feel sorry for him because they were charmed and thought "he wasn't that bad"
People like fictional anti-heroes. People don't like mob bosses or mass murderers in real life. I get liking something because of their entertainment value but seriously believing that he doesn't deserve to be in prison is delusion.It’s not weird, he’s the Standard anti hero. Who’s flaws and horrific behaviours are sort of ignored because he’s a great character. Everyone likes Tony Soprano, The Joker, Tony Montana, Stone Cold Steve Austin. They’re all wankers. Yes these are fictional characters but the way people respond to them is the same way they’ll respond to someone like Joe. He was clearly a gigantic cnut but he wore his heart on his sleeve and unlike Jeff and Carol he wasn’t a Completely unlike able personality vacuum. Everyone loves an anti hero.
It’s not weird, he’s the Standard anti hero. Who’s flaws and horrific behaviours are sort of ignored because he’s a great character. Everyone likes Tony Soprano, The Joker, Tony Montana, Stone Cold Steve Austin. They’re all wankers. Yes these are fictional characters but the way people respond to them is the same way they’ll respond to someone like Joe. He was clearly a gigantic cnut but he wore his heart on his sleeve and unlike Jeff and Carol he wasn’t a Completely unlike able personality vacuum. Everyone loves an anti hero.
I think the main difference is that Carole doesn't let people pet the cubs. She's still horrible for keeping those animals in small enclosures and playing it off as if she's saving them though, while still profiting off visitors. Not to mention the whole husband murdering thing.
People like fictional anti-heroes. People don't like mob bosses or mass murderers in real life. I get liking something because of their entertainment value but seriously believing that he doesn't deserve to be in prison is delusion.
Then there's this on top of it all:
She does have a good point about the that last part. It seems fecking weird to be fair. She did kill his ass though.People like fictional anti-heroes. People don't like mob bosses or mass murderers in real life. I get liking something because of their entertainment value but seriously believing that he doesn't deserve to be in prison is delusion.
Then there's this on top of it all:
The big deal for me was that she was on VHS basically doing exactly what the others were doing in terms of separating out the young animals and selling for profit. She could have changed since but a leopard doesnt change its spots............I've seen this mentioned a few places. Why does it matter that people volunteer? I think it was mentioned that it's run as a non-profit, do we have reason to doubt that and suspect she's taking the money for herself and not using it for the care of the animals?
Yeah I watch that stuff as well but at no point do I root for those people. I can understand what's behind Joe's behavior somewhat and it's sad because he started out with good intentions but he evolved into a scumbagWell yeah, but Joe was put onto a big screen with all his eccentric behaviours coming to light. I doubt before this anyone saw and read about what he did and then ‘liked’ him. But there are films about Ted Bundy, Bonnie and Clyde, Henry Hill etc. These people are real and did horrendous things but people watch these characters with an invested interest and there’s a reason why.
As for the Carol stuff, again the problem with her even if in the end she was the least worse of a bad bunch it was the way she came across. Nothing she did or said felt genuine and she was riddled with hypocrisies. She was also completely calculated and ruthless (going after people’s mums) and I dunno the idea that she was the victim in that relationship with Don Lewis seems a stretch regardless of age, doesn’t appear to have been subjected to abuse and she left with a multi million pound empire, hardly the struggles of a domestic victim. She tried to present herself as heroic and noble whereas the others didn’t and were aware of the fact they were shits. People generally don’t like people who are like this.
She came off as weird and eccentric. She had the characteristics of a woman who'd gone through abuse who coped with nervous laughter.As for the Carol stuff, again the problem with her even if in the end she was the least worse of a bad bunch it was the way she came across
She came after the owner of the zoo. It's not her fault that Joe was a cnut that ruined his own mother.She was also completely calculated and ruthless (going after people’s mums)
You think she was not victim of the abuse but you belive that she murdered her husband just for the money? Which of the two is the bigger stretch here in this scenario?the idea that she was the victim in that relationship with Don Lewis seems a stretch regardless of age, doesn’t appear to have been subjected to abuse and she left with a multi million pound empire, hardly the struggles of a domestic victim.
Joe and Doc bred tigers. That's worse than any of it. Carole doesn't do that, she takes in the cats because the only alternative is 1) to euthanize and 2) probably partly a front for her cat loving. Basically she's having her cake (getting to be around big cats) whilst eating it too (trying to getting it all banned).I think the main difference is that Carole doesn't let people pet the cubs. She's still horrible for keeping those animals in small enclosures and playing it off as if she's saving them though, while still profiting off visitors. Not to mention the whole husband murdering thing.
Yeah I watch that stuff as well but at no point do I root for those people. I can understand what's behind Joe's behavior somewhat and it's sad because he started out with good intentions but he evolved into a scumbag
Carole was 19 year old blonde in distress walking the streets when this old rich guy picked her up when he was just "driving around". Sounds like a textbook rapist to me, at least only a highly dubious personality would do something like that.
She came off as weird and eccentric. She had the characteristics of a woman who'd gone through abuse who coped with nervous laughter.
She came after the owner of the zoo. It's not her fault that Joe was a cnut that ruined his own mother.
You think she was not victim of the abuse but you belive that she murdered her husband just for the money? Which of the two is the bigger stretch here in this scenario?
People don't like her because she was a weird woman. Rooting for Joe and parroting "Carole Baskin is a bitch" is just typical sexism that you see all the time online from pathetic losers.
Carole being involved in his death is a theory thought to be possible by many people, including those close to the situation and even Don’s family.You think she was not victim of the abuse but you belive that she murdered her husband just for the money? Which of the two is the bigger stretch here in this scenario?