ClaytonBlackmoorLeftPeg
Full Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2017
- Messages
- 13,122
Avrim Grant for caretaker.
CL winner technically.AVB is free these days.
Avrim Grant for caretaker.
Yeah, speechless myself...Fair enough
Outplayed by 10 man Brighton.
Yeah it was a poor performance but I still think he has done a good job he took over them 9th in the league and last 16 in CL and QF of FA Cup. Now he is 5th SF of CL and final of FA cup. Whether he will challenge next year is still unknown but so far he has done a good job on paperVery poor performance. Didn't create one chance v a relegation candidate.
Yeah it was a poor performance but I still think he has done a good job he took over them 9th in the league and last 16 in CL and QF of FA Cup. Now he is 5th SF of CL and final of FA cup. Whether he will challenge next year is still unknown but so far he has done a good job on paper
Very poor performance. Didn't create one chance v a relegation candidate.
He has made Chelsea very boring to watch. Do they need to sign more attacking players?
They've always been boring.
I was defending him so that even does him more credit. He has done a good job with Chelsea. They have top 4 to aim for the FA cup which there favourites and outsiders for CL that is a good outcome4th, not 5th.
I was defending him so that even does him more credit. He has done a good job with Chelsea. They have top 4 to aim for the FA cup which there favourites and outsiders for CL that is a good outcome
First the ESL will affect the players and he is only there a wet day so the consistency isn’t there right now so poor performances are expected now and thenYou're right, he's done a very, very good job since coming in.
Tonight was shit of course but I'll give the team a pass after a great result a few days ago and a super strange day today.
You're right, he's done a very, very good job since coming in.
Tonight was shit of course but I'll give the team a pass after a great result a few days ago and a super strange day today.
He has made Chelsea very boring to watch. Do they need to sign more attacking players?
Since he took over, they have scored 17 goals in 13 league games.
4 of those goals in one game means they’re averaging a goal a game over a dozen games. Fairly sure they’ve been no more prolific in cup matches. After spending an astronomical sum of money on attacking players. Like I said, boooooooooring.
It's undoubtedly real management, but one still does not have to like the style. And Tuchel needs to sort out the attack soon - not conceding goals is obviously great, but guarantees only one point, not the three they need to progress to CL ranks. The fact that he still has trouble getting them on the scoreboard could cost them.Come on guys, look at the system, like at the patterns. That's real management.
But they were shit and Tuchel fixed that almost immediately. Pretty sure that is something the Chelsea fans accept at this stage of his tenure.They weren’t boring under Lampard.
Invariably, clubs receive an uplift when a new manager comes in. Could you imagine if United drew 0-0 with 10 man Brighton? Serious questions would be asked about Ole's coaching, his game plan, and his reliance of individualism; all that coming off the back of the best form in the league.It's undoubtedly real management, but one still does not have to like the style. And Tuchel needs to sort out the attack soon - not conceding goals is obviously great, but guarantees only one point, not the three they need to progress to CL ranks. The fact that he still has trouble getting them on the scoreboard could cost them.
Invariably, clubs receive an uplift when a new manager comes in. Could you imagine if United drew 0-0 with 10 man Brighton? Serious questions would be asked about Ole's coaching, his game plan, and his reliance of individualism; all that coming off the back of the best form in the league.
Come on guys, look at the system, like at the patterns. That's real management.
It was facetious mate, because that's exactly how it would be portrayed for the great pretender. Apologies, I thought that was obvious.Bro they played with 10 men for like 30 seconds. There are many points against Chelsea's performance. Why are so many people picking the least relevant one?
I think the reaction would depend a bit - if it happened like it did for Chelsea (creating no chances at all), people would be all over Ole, that is right (and rightfully so, a top team should not play that way, so I think it's fair to ask the same questions about Chelsea/Tuchel now).Invariably, clubs receive an uplift when a new manager comes in. Could you imagine if United drew 0-0 with 10 man Brighton? Serious questions would be asked about Ole's coaching, his game plan, and his reliance of individualism; all that coming off the back of the best form in the league.
His job's not in danger. Although we were back to Lampard standard in the Brighton game last night. Totally toothless and so boring to watch. Just shows Kovacic is a massive player for them. The bad performance last night down to team rotation and fringe players not stepping up.
His job's not in danger. Although we were back to Lampard standard in the Brighton game last night. Totally toothless and so boring to watch. Just shows Kovacic is a massive player for them. The bad performance last night down to team rotation and fringe players not stepping up.
incorrect. in 09/10 i think we scored 103 goals in the prem season. Only City have ever bettered itThey've always been boring.
incorrect. in 09/10 i think we scored 103 goals in the prem season. Only City have ever bettered it
Bro they played with 10 men for like 30 seconds. There are many points against Chelsea's performance. Why are so many people picking the least relevant one?
It will sound stupid but it was never that entertaining though. A great side (one of the best) but very robotic. I used to describe you as ‘the machines’, but it was very effective.incorrect. in 09/10 i think we scored 103 goals in the prem season. Only City have ever bettered it