Scottynaldinho
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2021
- Messages
- 1,576
Not negative, just that he hasn't won anything with "his" team like Klopp and Guardiola have done for years.Is that supposed to be a negative?
Not negative, just that he hasn't won anything with "his" team like Klopp and Guardiola have done for years.Is that supposed to be a negative?
Tuchel had Chelsea top of the PL in December. Then lost two of his fullbacks for rest of season. When Liverpool Lost VVD, the world came to an end!Di Matteo won the CL and the Fa Cup final in his first season.
Guardiola won the treble in his first top flight season. What was Klopp doing in his first top flight season? Struggling to avoid relegation!
Did say this too, to be fair :lol
Even harder to do it with someone else's team?Not negative, just that he hasn't won anything with "his" team like Klopp and Guardiola have done for years.
Just that it doesn't really tell you if the success will last.Even harder to do it with someone else's team?
Did say this too, to be fair :lol
To be fair, if you watch the replay of Christensen's miscue leading to the first goal, the bounce right before he strikes the ball is completely crazy. Its a standard long ball up the pitch that has already bounced once and then the second bounce is essentially straight up/sideways. I don't think it can be spin at that point because the ball has already bounced once normally. Its almost like the ball struck some object that was sitting on the pitch.
Not sure Lukaku was even his decision the way Chelsea were operating under their owner at the time. Never seemed like a Tuchel type player to me.People really are going out of their way to slate Tuchel. He might have spunked 100m on Wastekaku but it is only one player.
Look at what Pep and Klopp had to do to get where they are now. He might not be as good but he should be given the chance to build his own team.
New owners would be absolutely mad to even think of replacing Tuchel.
Werner and Lukaku are terrible buys. Havertz is pretty good but he isn't a striker or a natural finisher at allI feel sorry for him having to work with our attack.
Werner and Lukaku are terrible buys. Havertz is pretty good but he isn't a striker or a natural finisher at all
I agree, Id never start Werner. I get Lukaku coming on as he can finish.
Havertz is the most over protected player in our fanbase.
I agree, Id never start Werner. I get Lukaku coming on as he can finish.
Havertz is the most over protected player in our fanbase.
He did score the only goal in the Champions League final for Chelsea to win it.
Havertz is the most over protected player in our fanbase.
Could be worse could have McTominay to be looking atNonsense. At the moment that title goes to Kante. Was good in the second half but atrocious in the second - he's been poor for a month now.
He has done well to be fair, not to be too harsh but I do think of his Champions League win as a little bit situational. Not quite a fluke but just one of those years where you get to the semis and anyone could have won and they were in the midst a bit of a bounce.
With that said he is proof of what I am really hoping Ten Hag can prove here. If you take a very good football coach with a good group of players and just let him work then it will have positive results. He is very good I would just have the same worries I have with Ten Hag, is he as good as Klopp and Pep? No.
I appreciate what you're saying but I also think this is a bit harsh. We conceded 4 goals in the entire competition - whilst I wouldn't argue Chelsea were the best side who participated in the CL last year, I think it's pretty unequivocally true that Chelsea were comfortably the best team within the confines of the competition.
You were the best team within the confines of the competition, you won it. There is no debating that, Liverpool were the best Champions League side in 2005, it did not mean that Benitez was a better coach than Mourinho or Sir Alex though.
He’s done well considering his options up top are Lukaku , Werner and Havertz who isn’t a striker
In the same month he has been fasting for Ramadan, coincidence much? I think not.
Nonsense. At the moment that title goes to Kante. Was good in the second half but atrocious in the second - he's been poor for a month now.
We literally stopped creating anything the minute Lukaku came on, James post aside.
Yes, he’s had a bad hand with the £97.5m, £73m, and £45m purchases.He’s done well considering his options up top are Lukaku , Werner and Havertz who isn’t a striker
Add a real attack to this team and they'd be up there. The difference in their general play between now ans the pre Tuchel days is enormous. And with pretty much the same set of players. The issue is that he doesn't have players who can break teams at will like the other top 2 sides.
Of course they'll be going back 2 steps now with their CBs leaving so Tuchel is going to have to fix both attack and defence now despite the progress made.
He is good but very over rated imo. This season was a small disaster giving their squad and the supposed WC quality of the manager. Next season we will have a more complete picture of how good he really is but the signs are not as great as the media paints them.
Very harsh. CL quarter final, 3rd in the league and two cup finalsHe is good but very over rated imo. This season was a small disaster giving their squad and the supposed WC quality of the manager. Next season we will have a more complete picture of how good he really is but the signs are not as great as the media paints them.
Not nonsense at all, was a record signing at the time been here 2 seasons now and you can count on 2 hands how many good games he's actually had.
Was good in the second half but atrocious in the second, Huh?.
Kante along with James were our best players yesterday. Kante coming to the end, Kante first 2 seasons were alot lot better than Havertz.
Havertz has 2 more league goals, and 1 more goal in all competitions despite playing more minutes.