Gaming The SM RedCafe League

4:2 win vs Villarreal. Thanks, @RedSky for selling them Asenjo...

De Gea (94)

Aurier (91) Ramos (95) Boateng (94) Roberto (91)
Dier (91) Pogba (93)
Silva (91)➕ Griezmann (95)⚽ Bale (95)
Messi (99)⚽⚽⚽⭐

Subs: Sterling (91), Isco (92), Özil (94)➕➕, Götze (92), Rodriguez (91), Martial (90), Matip (90)
Suspended: Eriksen (92)
Injured (thanks, @The Stain): Goretzka (90)

Key:
⚽ = Goal
➕ = Assist
⭐ = MOTM
= Subbed off
= Subbed on


Home loss to @christy87 up next. Last match to rotate players in before the concern update (thanks again for Goretzka @The Stain)
I dont have a left back and iv decided to play my younger team for the next few
 
Fake news. He's signing for Liverpool so you may as well sell him to me :angel:

Breaking news: It is rumoured the Barnsley manager is in secret talks with the Chairman of Man Utd over a deal for Jordy Gaspar.

This is a rare occurrence as the Man Utd chairman has gone behind the managers back to take a more hands on approach with their transfer policy. It is thought that the chairman thinks the opportunity to sign an up and coming French star may be too good to turn down.

Rumours are Lionel Messi has opened contract talks for a part exchange deal due to a recent training ground altercation with the current Man Utd manager.

More to follow...
 
It's the CL Semis and a game where fitness isn't affected so the logical thing to do is to rest half the first team.

Well done AssMan! :mad:
 
Southend Utd Serie A players

Prediction (and very optimistic one)
  • Jasmin Kurtic (28/88): +1
  • Piotr Zielinski (23/88): +1
  • Gianluigi Donnarumma (18/88): +1
  • Lucas Torreira (21/84): +2
  • Han Kwang Song (18/75): +1
  • Bruno Peres (27/89): no change
  • Ianis Hagi (18/78): no change
  • Moise Kean (17/76): no change
  • Alessandro Bastoni (18/70): +5
  • Henrique Leandrinho (18/76): no change
  • Gaetano Castrovilli (19/73): no change
  • Davide Astori (30/89): no change
  • Claud Adjapong (18/77): +3
  • Rodrigo Bentancur (19/85): +1 (if reviewed)

Southend Utd Serie A players
  • Claud Adjapong (18/77): +1 (to 78) :(
  • Lucas Torreira (21/84): +3 (to 87) :)
  • Han Kwang Song (18/75): +1 (to 76)
 
So can i ship out deadwood to external clubs when I'm buying their players?

You can part exchange two players as part of a deal with a club outside of our divisions. This though is at face value for the player. If you sold the same player you may receive 10% more than face value, but it relies on waiting for a bid to come in which could take a while. So it depends on the speed you want to rebuild and if you want to maximise the cash potential of your players.
 
You can part exchange two players as part of a deal with a club outside of our divisions. This though is at face value for the player. If you sold the same player you may receive 10% more than face value, but it relies on waiting for a bid to come in which could take a while. So it depends on the speed you want to rebuild and if you want to maximise the cash potential of your players.
Cheers.
Slim pickings out there right now so need to be really shrewd.
 
Serie A review:

Maximiliano Oliveira: +3 (82)
Rafael Toloi: +1 (88)
Raul Albiol: Stay (89) +1 if he was younger.
Remo Freuler: +2 (85)
Laureiro Allan: Stay (90)
Alberto Grassi: +2 (82)
Vanja Milinkovic-Savic: +2 (80) +2 (82)
Alessandro Plizzari: +5 (70)
Felipe Melegoni: +2 (73)
Patrick Cutrone: +5 (70)
Christian Capone: Stay (73)
Andrea Conti: +4 (82)
Marko Pjaca: Stay (86) :( this makes me sad!
Andrea Petagna: +3 (83)

Edit: Wow didn't realise how many I had from Italy.
 
June's FFP and youth table update may be late

giphy.gif
 
Icardi and Kane both rising in the reviews :drool:

Will be a impossible to manage their game time though unless I switch to a 2 striker system which I don't really like.
 
Kane as second striker behind Icardi
Yeah, I know but I never quite manage to get the 4-2-3-1 to work unfortunately. That's what I played for most of this season to accommodate Reus upfront with 1 of these guys + subbing the other and I had a horrendous run. Switched to a 4-3-3 and it was business as usual.
 
FFP Status (1 Jun 2017)

Div 1
  1. Manchester United - 41/42
  2. Arsenal - 44/45
  3. Manchester City - 40/46
  4. Newcastle United - 46/47
  5. Sunderland - 47/48
  6. Aston Villa - 47/49
  7. Blackburn Rovers - 42/49
  8. Chelsea - 49/49
  9. Everton - 46/49
  10. Fulham - 48/49
  11. Norwich City - 48/49
  12. Nottingham Forest - 49/49
  13. Tottenham Hotspur - 43/49
  14. Wolverhampton Wanderers - 49/49
  15. Darlington 1883 - 48/49
  16. Plymouth Argyle - 43/49
  17. Milton Keynes Dons - 39/50
  18. Birmingham City - 50/50
  19. Barnsley - 48/53
  20. AFC Bournemouth - 26/54
Div 2
  1. West Ham - 45/47
  2. Liverpool - 45/49
  3. Southampton - 38/51
  4. Stoke City - 28/51
  5. Leeds United - 33/52
  6. Cardiff City - 48/53
  7. Derby County - 53/53
  8. Leicester City - 30/53
  9. Middlesbrough - 35/53
  10. Sheff Utd - 21/53
  11. Ipswich Town - 41/54
  12. Bristol City - 53/55
  13. Queens Park Rangers - 48/55
  14. Reading - 34/55
  15. Swansea - 34/55
  16. Bury - 28/56
  17. Southend United - 54/56
Div 3
  1. Charlton - 34/57
  2. Hereford FC - 55/61
Div 5
  1. Kidderminster - 36/65
 
88 rated CB and RB needed on loan next season, please let me know if anyone has anything available.
 
2016 Youth Table
Jan '17 Youth Table
Feb '17 Youth Table
Mar '17 Youth Table
Apr '17 Youth Table
May '17 Youth Table

Jun '17 Youth Table

Position - Team - Points | Num of Players

  1. Hereford 50.8 | 25
  2. QPR 46.3 | 18
  3. Chelsea 45 | 19
  4. Darlington 43.2 | 13
  5. Southend 42.9 | 13
  6. Everton 34.7 | 12
  7. Arsenal 32.5 | 10
  8. Forest 29 | 13
  9. Aston Villa 28.8 | 12
  10. Plymouth 27.8 | 12
  11. Liverpool 26.7 | 9
  12. Man Utd 25.5 | 9
  13. Ipswich 24.8 | 10
  14. Spurs 20.9 | 10
  15. Fulham 20.8 | 7
  16. Sunderland 19 | 6
  17. Newcastle 18.5 | 8
  18. Cardiff 18.2 | 8
  19. Norwich City 16.3 | 8
  20. Bristol City 15.8 | 9
  21. Kidderminster 15.6 | 11
  22. Derby 14.2 | 5
  23. Blackburn 14.1 | 6
  24. Wolves 12.7 | 7
  25. Southampton 11.9 | 6
  26. Man City 10.8 | 4
  27. MKD 10.3 | 7
  28. Leeds United 9.5 | 3
  29. Stoke 7.6 | 3
  30. West Ham 6.7 | 4
  31. Bournemouth 5 | 2
  32. Barnsley 4.3 | 2
  33. Birmingham 4.1 | 3
  34. Leicester 4.1 | 3
  35. Middlesbrough 2.5 | 1
  36. Charlton 1.8 | 1
  37. Reading 1 | 1
  38. Bury 0 | 0
  39. Sheff Utd 0 | 0
  40. Swansea 0 | 0
 
They are actually slowing down the review because of the CL final. That is so dumb. Not like they could just go back to Juve afterwards. Were they thinking people would come after them with pitchforks for not reviewing Juve? They think their userbase are stupid. LMFAO #covfefewhateverthefeckthatis