- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 58,546
I've seen the odd bit here and there and have it recorded on Sky box. Is it near unwatchable?Eraserhead
Wat.
I've seen the odd bit here and there and have it recorded on Sky box. Is it near unwatchable?Eraserhead
Wat.
I've seen the odd bit here and there and have it recorded on Sky box. Is it near unwatchable?
Kind of sounds up my street. Sounds like Antichrist- interesting, but not really a reapeat viewing film.Nah wouldn't say so, for as weird as it is I'd argue it's reasonably easy to follow for the most part, and it's only an hour and a half anyway. It's more just ridiculously disturbing and weird more than anything else. Long time since I've felt so uneasy watching a film. I kind of liked it though. I think. But I'll almost certainly never watch it again.
straight on my to watch list.Bad Boy Bubby is one of the most fecked up movies I've ever seen.
Probably tops Wake in Fright, even - the Aussie's are just great are producing this kinda stuff.
Bad Boy Bubby is one of the most fecked up movies I've ever seen.
Probably tops Wake in Fright, even - the Aussie's are just great are producing this kinda stuff.
A friend gave me her Netflix password yonks ago. Not sure she remembers tbh, but this might screw up her viewing suggestions.straight on my to watch list.
Bad Boy Bubby is one of the most fecked up movies I've ever seen.
Probably tops Wake in Fright, even - the Aussie's are just great are producing this kinda stuff.
Is Stalker worth the time (161 mins) spent watching?
It's 161% worth watching.
Why is trainspotting rated so highly? I mean it’s a decent film but why is it seen such a top film and cult classic? Is it a case of ‘you had to be there in Edinburgh in mid 90s to get why it’s awesome’?
And how is the second part?
Why is trainspotting rated so highly? I mean it’s a decent film but why is it seen such a top film and cult classic? Is it a case of ‘you had to be there in Edinburgh in mid 90s to get why it’s awesome’?
And how is the second part?
looks fairly dead behind the eyes, so I bought a couple of books from him.
You get used to it. Watch a few old movies and you'll also see how easy it is to adapt to more deliberate pacing.Honestly how do you guys watch movies that old? I wanna try some of Hitchcock's films like Vertigo, Dial M For Murder etc but aren't they extremely slow movies compared to movies today?
Baby Face - This is probably the most pre-code pre-code Hollywood film I've ever seen, the entire premise being that the main character uses sex to get ahead in life. Very enjoyable stuff (anything with Barbara Stanwyck in it usually is).
Yes! But don't feel bad if after watching it you think it was a bit boring, I liked it a lot(The tunnel is just brilliant) but it's at times really slow and well honestly a bit dull.Is Stalker worth the time (161 mins) spent watching?
Yes! But don't feel bad if after watching it you think it was a bit boring, I liked it a lot(The tunnel is just brilliant) but it's at times really slow and well honestly a bit dull.
On being told that Stalker should be faster and more dynamic, Tarkovsky replied:
The film needs to be slower and duller at the start so that the viewers who walked into the wrong theatre have time to leave before the main action starts.
I think one of the biggest differences after 1934 is the portrayal of women. It would take decades before you saw strong female characters like that again.It was movies like Baby Face that led to the introduction of the code.
I'm always struck by how marked the transition is from pre-code to post-code. Even though the same cinematic technology is employed, Hollywood movies of the early thirties have a very different look and texture to the films of a few years later.
Once the code was in place, screen life was always slightly cosmeticized. It became the distinctive style of the Hollywood Golden Age. The dirt under the fingernails of America wasn't shown again until the 60s.
Whats the code?It was movies like Baby Face that led to the introduction of the code.
I'm always struck by how marked the transition is from pre-code to post-code. Even though the same cinematic technology is employed, Hollywood movies of the early thirties have a very different look and texture to the films of a few years later.
Once the code was in place, screen life was always slightly cosmeticized. It became the distinctive style of the Hollywood Golden Age. The dirt under the fingernails of America wasn't shown again until the 60s.
Yeah fantastic film, nice summary.Stalker
I saw this movie about six months a go and it blew my mind. It was the most hypnotic, transcendent film I have ever seen, a film that made me feel emotions and feelings in a way that no other film has managed to. It was a completely immersive and mystifying experience watching this film and completely in-comparable to anything I have seen before. Its also one of the most personal films I have experienced, it stripped down my minds logical defences and explored a state of id that I had never knew even existed. Words can't describe the emotions I felt when watching this film and even if they could, I would be reluctant to want to share such feelings with anybody else. It really is that good.
If I had to describe the feeling it gave me, it would be like lying in bed having a fever dream whilst a storm raged outside. That sort of fuzzy, out of body vulnerability that you feel just listening to the water hit against your window as your overheated mind distorts reality around you.
10/10
Whats the code?
Sounds like you had decent mushrooms.Stalker
I saw this movie about six months a go and it blew my mind. It was the most hypnotic, transcendent film I have ever seen, a film that made me feel emotions and feelings in a way that no other film has managed to. It was a completely immersive and mystifying experience watching this film and completely in-comparable to anything I have seen before. Its also one of the most personal films I have experienced, it stripped down my minds logical defences and explored a state of id that I had never knew even existed. Words can't describe the emotions I felt when watching this film and even if they could, I would be reluctant to want to share such feelings with anybody else. It really is that good.
If I had to describe the feeling it gave me, it would be like lying in bed having a fever dream whilst a storm raged outside. That sort of fuzzy, out of body vulnerability that you feel just listening to the water hit against your window as your overheated mind distorts reality around you.
10/10
Thanks!The Hays code, introduced in 1934, in which Hollywood voluntarily accepted certain moral guidelines regulating the content of motion pictures. It determined what could be shown on screen for the next quarter of a century, and wasn't fully abandoned until the late sixties. For instance, men and women, even husband and wife, could not be shown sharing a bed. It was named after Will Hays, a prominent American politician, who was appointed by the studios to take charge of the system.
YESIs Stalker worth the time (161 mins) spent watching?
I used to think that, I would never watch an old film, but because of this thread , I watch some and never looked back.Honestly how do you guys watch movies that old? I wanna try some of Hitchcock's films like Vertigo, Dial M For Murder etc but aren't they extremely slow movies compared to movies today?
The original Psycho is great, as is The Birds. Both well-paced and brilliant watches, irrespective of being old, god forbid.Honestly how do you guys watch movies that old? I wanna try some of Hitchcock's films like Vertigo, Dial M For Murder etc but aren't they extremely slow movies compared to movies today?