Andy_Cole
Full Member
Good Burger 2
Nostalgic fun.
8.5/10
Nostalgic fun.
8.5/10
A couple of truly unforgettable scenes in there as well.Really enjoyed Saltburn last night both visually and politically. Any film that makes me root for the villain is a winner by me. Cast are all fantastic as well.
I've said it before, but I had the same with The Irishman. A very long film and it feels that way (although I have to admit I watched in two or three sittings), but it still feels rushed. My opinion for that one is that Scorcese either should have made a much shorter film that's much more tightly focused (around the Hoffa story or about the hitman work vs family life) or a miniseries. Instead, he crammed a miniseries's worth of content into a 3.5h film, and it shows. I haven't yet seen Killers of the Flowers Moon though.I’m not sure how Scorsese did it but he made me feel like Killers of the Flower Moon was both way too long and way too rushed.
Pretty much the exact same. Although weirdly the last hour drags and feels unnecessary. It would’ve been a much better miniseries, too.I've said it before, but I had the same with the Irishman. A very long film and it feels that way (although I have to admit I watched in two or three sittings), but it still feels rushed. My opinion for that one is that Scorcese either should have made a much shorter film that's much more tightly focused (around the Hoffa story or about the hitman work vs family life) or a miniseries. Instead, he crammed a miniseries's worth of content into a 3.5h film, and it shows. I haven't yet seen Killers of the Flowers Moon though.
You might be right about the Evil Dead, there was a good bit of comedy in the original.Evil Dead was lacking in the comedy element for me. It felt waaaay too serious.
As for Leave The World Behind, I genuinely thought the ending was perfect. Worked thematically and executed in a way that is surprising.
I feel like this was meant for the football thread...Just ban the wanker already.
Really enjoyed Saltburn last night both visually and politically. Any film that makes me root for the villain is a winner by me. Cast are all fantastic as well.
Yeah thought it was pretty good.Only thing I wasn’t sure of was the kind of “villain monologue this is how I did it” trope which can be overdone. Thought they maybe could’ve revealed that in a more subtle way. Everyone in the cast was great though as you’ve said and some very memorable scenes.
There's a persistent rumor that Cinema Paradiso was accidentally screened for US distributors without the last reel, and they thought it was over and said they'd buy it. Is it a cop out like an M Night movie?Leave the World Behind
The film built up to what I though was going to be a blockbuster ending, you saw the mushroom clouds over the city a few text message on the screen, I thought this is it, the blockbuster ending it here, then NOTHING just the end credits.
I was fuming, I felt cheated out of an ending, I was angry for hours afterwards.
8/10 with a better ending, with the ending we got 5/10
Can I ask what you mean by that? Cause to me, that's a funny comment: why wouldn't a film from 1939 be well directed? Obviously, some things hadn't been invented / come up with / figured out yet (even some things that seem very obvious now) and certain esthetics and expectations were different back then - but there are many excellent films from that era and also before. Is it that you just haven't seen a lot of old films and had low expectations?Gone with the Wind (1939)
Runtime was long as hell. Nevertheless, it seemed amazingly well directed for a movie from 1939.
I haven't seen a lot of old films. In fact, I've only seen 1 film from the 40s I think and that was Casablanca. Hadn't seen anything from the 30s before Gone with the Wind.Can I ask what you mean by that? Cause to me, that's a funny comment: why wouldn't a film from 1939 be well directed? Obviously, some things hadn't been invented / come up with / figured out yet (even some things that seem very obvious now) and certain esthetics and expectations were different back then - but there are many excellent films from that era and also before. Is it that you just haven't seen a lot of old films and had low expectations?
I rewatched the first season recently and it’s such a great and strange show. Switch between cool drug busts and comedy pet alligator.
Did you watch the 2006 film ?
Yeah, that would make sense then.I haven't seen a lot of old films. In fact, I've only seen 1 film from the 40s I think and that was Casablanca. Hadn't seen anything from the 30s before Gone with the Wind.
I guess my expectations were low indeed.
If not seen it, I’d recommend ‘12 Angry Men’ (1957).I haven't seen a lot of old films. In fact, I've only seen 1 film from the 40s I think and that was Casablanca. Hadn't seen anything from the 30s before Gone with the Wind.
I guess my expectations were low indeed.
I would recommend Fail Safe set a bit later, set in an underground bunker with not many cast members.If not seen it, I’d recommend ‘12 Angry Men’ (1957).
Great film, especially considering almost all of it is set in one (jury) room.
I've seen Fail Safe. Great movie!I would recommend Fail Safe set a bit later, set in an underground bunker with not many cast members.
Yeah, 12 Angry Men has been on my watchlist for a long time...If not seen it, I’d recommend ‘12 Angry Men’ (1957).
Great film, especially considering almost all of it is set in one (jury) room.
No worries. My bad I thought the video was a reference to the film. Completely agree with you on that scene especially when the drop happens and cuts to the shot above the car hood. In terms of pure vibes and coolness nothing beats it.I’ve been really rubbish with films lately.
Still not watched Miami Vice or Mulholland Drive. Basically the two I promised you that I’d watch.
I have a week off work into the New Year so if I can find them on something I’ll watch. Miami Vice never seems to be on anything though. Mulholland Drive was on film4 for a while but not seen it jump back on.
RE the scene I posted though it’s just perfect. The blend of music, cinematography and editing. The whole vibe it creates. Just makes you want to hop back in to the 80s.
I've said it before, but I had the same with The Irishman. A very long film and it feels that way (although I have to admit I watched in two or three sittings), but it still feels rushed. My opinion for that one is that Scorcese either should have made a much shorter film that's much more tightly focused (around the Hoffa story or about the hitman work vs family life) or a miniseries. Instead, he crammed a miniseries's worth of content into a 3.5h film, and it shows. I haven't yet seen Killers of the Flowers Moon though.
I agree great film.I've seen Fail Safe. Great movie!
I've seen Fail Safe. Great movie!
Forgot about the Hill, for me Connery's best, its been a long time since I watched it.There’s very few Sidney Lumet films you can go wrong with. THE PAWNBROKER (he made it the same year as FAIL SAFE) and THE HILL (his first of five films made with Sean Connery and one of Connery’s best roles) are cracking.
Lumet also made THE OFFENCE with Connery and he is sensational in that too. Only disappointing film of the five was FAMILY BUSINESS.Forgot about the Hill, for me Connery's best, its been a long time since I watched it.
I will add The Offence to my watch list.Lumet also made THE OFFENCE with Connery and he is sensational in that too. Only disappointing film of the five was FAMILY BUSINESS.
I will add The Offence to my watch list.
I remember the deal, 2 films, the second was his version of Macbeth but it got cancelledNice. Hope you enjoy a tough watch. Ian Bannen is astonishing in this two-hander. Connery set this film up as part of his DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER deal.
I remember the deal, 2 films, the second was his version of Macbeth but it got cancelled
I haven't seen these films, but FYI that you can choose Inline Spoiler (tag is ISPOILER) to hide parts of sentences. That looks like this: some text here (click to reveal). It's probably easier than using white text.I really enjoyed Killers of the Flower Moon
I had no problem with the duration of the movie, although I did watch it at home in two sittings. I can imagine 3.5 hours is a bit too long sitting in the cinema together with other moviegoers.
I thought after the introduction of the FBI the movie felt rushed and the movie ended a bit too sudden in my opinion. I was hoping to see more of Molly's story after her divorce, because she endured so many hardships and was just crying the whole movie. I just wanted to see, like really see, her happy., but that wasn't meant to be.
Really, why were women of the Osage tribe married to white men in the first place? Why not Osagen men? I just don't understand. It wasn't like the women were poor and were financially dependent on their white husbands. They had money and a good reputation. Is it like a "trophy husband" to show the white locals that they are "civilized" or something? Or maybe Osagen women want their children to be born more "white" so the white people will accept them?
9 out of 10
Leave the World Behind
Really good and interesting movie.
Of course, the ending was a bit abrupt, but I am ok with open endings. As a whole the movie would have benefited from a better, alternative ending. I really didn't care for the daughter and her obsession with Friends. To to see the movie ends with the daughter is just disappointing.
If I was the director and I wanted to have a open ending I would have edited out the final daughter scene entirely and just let the movie ends with Mahershala Ali and Ethan Hawke driving away.
8.5 out of 10
Wonka (2023)
Never really cared for Charlie and the Chocolade Factory. Johnny Depp's Wonka was just weird and an out of touch with the world hermit. I tagged along with my kids because they liked the new Wonka trailer and the movie didn't disappoint.
Wonka is way better than the disappointing Matilda musical.
I like Timothée Chalamet's Willy Wonka, I like Hugh Grant in this one, the songs are great, the origin story was interesting to watch. Hopefully there will be another prequel or sequel.
9 out of 10
I keep forgetting that one when listing films. Great film as well!Yeah, 12 Angry Men has been on my watchlist for a long time...
I haven't seen these films, but FYI that you can choose Inline Spoiler (tag is ISPOILER) to hide parts of sentences. That looks like this: some text here (click to reveal). It's probably easier than using white text.
Watched it last night and agree with all your comments. I don’t think some of off putting scenes were not necessary to get the essence and direction of the movie. Fantastic movie for sure.Saltburn (2023), with Barry Keoghan.
Keoghan is a lock for a Best Actor nomination, and he should probably win it, too.
Some really nice directorial touches in this, great composition of shots. They used a squarish aspect ratio, not really sure why, but it made it feel a little more "timeless" and less part of the current cinema moment, like you are discovering a film from 20 or so years ago. There were quite a few things I didn't like in this film, and fortunately my teenager bailed out before things got too gnarly. It's a really well made film. I don't know if I'd recommend it to the average viewer cuz it is so off-putting in parts. I loved the ending with Keoghan dancing around with his ding dong flapping in the breeze in celebration of his victory , but felt the moral ambiguity was definitely of this cynical age. Whereas films like The Talented Mr. Ripley / Purple Noon, and Parasite also deal with an outsider gazing through the window to the lives of the rich, Saltburn differs because it celebrates the villain. I'll be happy for Keoghan to win the golden statue.
8/10