calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
Exactly. ‘Vechicles’ is a perfect term.Ever since Creed, every movie role is just a vehicle to take his shirt off. He should focus on actually acting rather than flashing his pecs.
Exactly. ‘Vechicles’ is a perfect term.Ever since Creed, every movie role is just a vehicle to take his shirt off. He should focus on actually acting rather than flashing his pecs.
Without Remorse
Amazon Original movie with Michael B. Jordan. If you watch it, you’ll wish you hadn’t. And I can only imagine that the actors and director wish they weren’t associated with it. Indecipherably bad. Michael B. Jordan with the worst acting performance I’ve seen in a long time. And dialogue worthy of a high school play. Just appalling from start to finish. No redeeming qualities. Atrocious.
1/10
This was released before the Blair Witch remake, not the original.Cloverfield
I decided to go through my library and watch all my underwatched movies in alphabetical order, rather than just going for the comfort option all the time. Problem being, the first thing I have is 10 Cloverfield Lane, and since I hadn't watched its prequel thought I'd best start with that.
As a monster / disaster movie, I really liked it. Was surprised to see it was released before Blair Witch, considering the camcorder-style presentation, since BW seems to get a lot of credit for that format. There's a few bits which stretch credulity (not the monsters), like absolutely catastrophic injuries that are immediately ignored, but on the whole it's pretty solid.
Good effects considering its age, decent acting for the most part (although I didn't care too much for the leading man) and a no-nonsense plot. Looking forward to 10.
7/10
This was released before the Blair Witch remake, not the original.
Cloverfield
I decided to go through my library and watch all my underwatched movies in alphabetical order, rather than just going for the comfort option all the time. Problem being, the first thing I have is 10 Cloverfield Lane, and since I hadn't watched its prequel thought I'd best start with that.
As a monster / disaster movie, I really liked it. Was surprised to see it was released before Blair Witch, considering the camcorder-style presentation, since BW seems to get a lot of credit for that format. There's a few bits which stretch credulity (not the monsters), like absolutely catastrophic injuries that are immediately ignored, but on the whole it's pretty solid.
Good effects considering its age, decent acting for the most part (although I didn't care too much for the leading man) and a no-nonsense plot. Looking forward to 10.
7/10
I preferred the first but I did also love Lane. Both excellent films. Shame Paradox was a crock of shite.They're all pretty self contained. Its a decent series. Think Cloverfield Lane was my favorite.
It was the weakest by a distance, i probably would have found it enjoyable enough if it wasn't for the association with much better movies. I haven't watched the first in years, main memory is absolutely hating the guy holding the camera in an otherwise great movie.I preferred the first but I did also love Lane. Both excellent films. Shame Paradox was a crock of shite.
Yeah thats what elevated it above the others for me. Great characters10 Cloverfield Lane
Bloody loved it, a lot better than the first. Winstead and Goodman were fantastic, and I will definitely be watching again. Solid plot, believable acting, edge of your seat shizzle.
9/10
I was really intrigued by this after seeing the trailers and synopsis of it, but i watched it a few months back and didn't really like it. It felt too contrived, the cast felt wasted and I can hardly remember anything about it now.Sorry To Bother You: A dark comedy that satirizes capitalist society by telling the tale of a young guy who works in telemarketing and tries to make his way up in the world. That's rather generic, which the film absolutely isn't; but I am not sure what else I can say without spoiling key or fun elements of the film. Things start out quirky and funny, and gradually develops into really weird (magical realism stuff) and still very funny. A lot what it brings up in terms of societal criticism is rather poignant, although I found the single-minded focus on labour unions as a solution a little weak intellectually. I also felt potential narrative drama could have been worked out better near the end, and some plot bits could have tied up better; although it's also nice (and realistic) that the film has a more open ending; nothing's neat in these things. (Well, the 'extra scene' does a nice bit of hilarious mop-up.)
It's hard rather to be specific about the film without spoiling it, or to really convey the weirdness of it - while it all still stays very grounded and relatable. I'd just really recommend it. It's an anarchic film that's really funny, very clever and varied in terms of film-making, and makes lots of great points.
Really? I thought it was pretty much a standard thriller with little subtlety and nothing very original. Second half of it especially got very boring.I care a lot
Black comedy? Thriller? Hmmm
Rosamund pike is great in this. Also has Dinklage who is good too. Intriguing movie
Maybe I enjoyed it as I haven't watched many movies recently and I'm biased towards Tyrion?Really? I thought it was pretty much a standard thriller with little subtlety and nothing very original. Second half of it especially got very boring.
I thought she was ok although she seems the play the same part again and again, and Tyrion was just a cartoon villain for me. I actually quite actively disliked it, probably cos of the hype around it, and how lazy I found it to be ultimately.Maybe I enjoyed it as I haven't watched many movies recently and I'm biased towards Tyrion?
I did enjoy it but I can see why you would say nothing original. The performances for me were really good however
I didnt know there was hype and went in not having a clue Maybe that helped me to enjoy it.I thought she was ok although she seems the play the same part again and again, and Tyrion was just a cartoon villain for me. I actually quite actively disliked it, probably cos of the hype around it, and how lazy I found it to be ultimately.
Dr No they had no idea how it was going to pan out out, agreed it was boring in parts, no toys, no iconic car, I would actual rank this below Diamonds with a 5 and Diamonds with a 6.For some reason I've decided to rewatch all the Bond movies so I can finally have a clear idea of how they rank against each other. Important, I know.
Will just rate them when I finish each actor, or something like that.
Dr. No (1962)
Not bad, but it's clear they hadn't really nailed the tone of it yet. Connery looks perfect, but the acting is a bit off in places, and the story is sort of boring. Also, the bond girl is hot but weird, and there's no chemistry. 6/10
From Russia with Love (1963)
Quite liked this one. It's played quite straight, feels more like a real espionage thriller than a bond movie at times. Cool story, decent love story, and great shots on location in Istanbul. 8/10
Goldfinger (1964)
Was almost a bit put off by the change in tone from the previous one, but this one is also quite cool. Much more tongue in cheek, Pussy Galore, etc. Cool villain, had forgotten how weird Goldfinger is. 8/10
Thunderball (1965)
A bit of a strange one. Connery is perfect in it, the plot is not bad, if a bit slow at first. But the underwater scenes are confusing and don't really work in terms of story telling. Looks nice, but that's about it. 7/10
You Only Live Twice (1967)
Apparently Roald Dahl wrote the script for this one, not that it shows. It's nicely filmed, lots of stuff on location in Japan, but the plot is too similar to Dr. No, and there isn't any time for Bond to bond (hehe) with the girl who ends up being his love interest. Funny when he goes full Japanese undercover though. 7/10
On Her Majesty's Secret Service (1969)
I remember not liking George Lazenby as Bond when I was younger, but really liked his performance this time around. The movie is surprisingly serious, has probably the best love story in any Bond movie. Looks great too. I didn't really care for the this Bloefeld, but still, surprisingly good. 8/10
Diamonds Are Forever (1971)
The worst one so far. I have no idea what they were going for. It's a bit campy, but in a really weird way. The plot is totally whatever, the girl is whatever, and Sean Connery looks way too old 5/10
I agree, OHMSS could have easily been 9, was a bit unsure. Think maybe it will stand out even more when I'm done with the rest. Currently on Moore's TMWTGG now, hope it's better than his first one. Didn't particularly like Live and Let Die.Dr No they had no idea how it was going to pan out out, agreed it was boring in parts, no toys, no iconic car, I would actual rank this below Diamonds with a 5 and Diamonds with a 6.
The rest agree with you, apart from OHMSS, I think this is just ahead of the rest, I liked George Lazenby , Diana Rigg was excellent, I even liked Savalas, not the best Bloefeld but still very good. OHMSS gets a 9 from me.
Those Who Wish Me Dead
Action mvoie reminiscent of the 90s. I can see Stallone doing this similar to his Daylight back then. Good plot, tau pacing and good acting. Good watch. 7/10
Nobody
An absolutely fun watch. A more fun John Wick. engaging and engrossing from the get go. Usual story with not many surprises, but the screenplay and acting makes this a top watch. 9/10.