Wasted 16 quid on renting Wonder Woman 1984.
I might learn now to believe reviews, so at least there's that. Managed 55 minutes.
£16! is that how much these things cost! Wow. I wait the three years until things ooo up on Netflix or Prime - am far too tight to pay that.
It's cos of the lack of cinema thing. I think the price is about right especaily if you're watching as a family. Still a shite film though.
I’m out of touch! I thought it was about £4.
mind you the last time I rented a film, it was a DVD about 20 years ago!
Wasted 16 quid on renting Wonder Woman 1984.
I might learn now to believe reviews, so at least there's that. Managed 55 minutes.
I really don't think there's a single movie that's worth 16 dollars.
There's plenty worth that. I mean to buy.
Honestly feel it's way too much money for me.
Con AirI really don't think there's a single movie that's worth 16 dollars.
Watched tenet. Too many action scenes and you would want a phd in theoretical physics to understand it.
I suspect that anyone with a PhD in Theoretical Physics would be crying into their cup of dark matter in frustration at the utter bollocks being served up.
Watched tenet. Too many action scenes and you would want a phd in theoretical physics to understand it.
I watched Kieślowski's Trois couleurs: Bleu on Netflix. It's been a while since I watched an artistically strong film like that - a good reminder that I should reserve more time for that. Visually, the film is great: the way shots are composed, how part of the story is only told through images, and so on. I also love the pacing of the film; such patience to let moments and scenes develop and express themselves. Nonetheless, I think the plot is a little thin: not quite as deep or meaningful as some of the shots/scenes or the general tone of the film suggest. All the same, a great watch.
Rewatched Blade Runner 2049 mainly because I missed the first hour after falling asleep in the cinema. I struggled to stay awake this time. Casting Gosling as a soulless replicant was a masterstroke. So Tyrell installed wombs and ovaries and whatnot in their replicants, did they? Or did she just do what Loretta had planned and keep it in a box? What a bag of shite.
I think you'll still enjoy it. The quality of the cinematography hasn't diminished. I guess the image is a little grainy and the pace excruciatingly show compared to today's films, but I don't suppose that's your frame of reference. Pretty cool your friend got to work with Kieślowski!I haven't watched it in years but I love that film. The cinematography is stunning. My mate (well acquaintance now I guess), now a top cinematographer in his own right, spent some time working with/being mentored by Krzysztof Kieślowski just before he died. I am wary of watching it again in case it doesn't live up to expectations.
I think there were some loose ends in the plot, like how the pregnancy was possible (evolution?) and what's up exactly with that 'rebel army' that K meets near the end. Other than that, I felt a bit mixed about the movie. The cinematography is absolutely gorgeous; there are tons of awesome-looking scenes, the final scenes flying towards and fighting in the shuttle topping it all for me. (It reminded me of the train job scene in The Assassination of Jess James.) The characters were not very engrossing though, and I was disappointed by the music. I know some people love it, but I felt the very special vibe and feel of Vangelis's soundtrack had been replaced by a fairly generic big-sounder modern-day soundtrack. (Including those god-awful Inception trailer drones.) I guess I compare too much to the original Blade Runner here, also for the characters; but so I think it's awesome movie to look at, but just 'kinda good' to experience as whole.What? I thought it was bloody brilliant. I expected a total balls up but it was superb.
Tyrell didn't install things in female replicants I doubt. The implication was that some were grown/cloned with these biological features necessary for reproduction including gestation and birth. Presumably previously they hadn't.
In fact you'll still enjoy it. The quality of the cinematography hasn't diminished. I guess the image is a little grainy and the pace excruciatingly show compared to today's films, but I don't suppose that's your frame of reference. Pretty cool your friend got to work with Kieślowski!
I do actually think it was all figured out by writer(s); or at least, my impression is that they thought things through quite well in general. I just think it could have been explained better in the film.I don't think there was a suggestion of evolution just that Tyrell chose not to include an end date for some models and presumably also didn't turn off the ability to breed (or perhaps allowed the reproductive systems to grow during the cloning process).
I love the original but I also liked the soundtrack for 2049. Maybe I loved it because it was such a surprise they didn't totally feck it up. I also love that they resisted reusing some obvious lines from the original e.g. so tempting to say "time to die" at the end.
The rebel army were apparently going to be the focus of the next film that now looks like it won't get made most likely.
Mean to say 'I think' instead of 'in fact' here btw.In factI think you'll still enjoy it. The quality of the cinematography hasn't diminished. I guess the image is a little grainy and the pace excruciatingly show compared to today's films, but I don't suppose that's your frame of reference. Pretty cool your friend got to work with Kieślowski!