I'd say Littbarski at his peak came close to Ribery at his best. Depending on what you want from your attacking player, you can make a case for both, just like many people rate Robben at his best higher than Ribery in his treble winning form (which I disagree with though).You've completely lost the plot now. I rate Littbarski higher than Robben, that's why I laughed.
I don't buy the whole Bossis-Amoros-Litti "proven" thing. Bossis-Litti was very brief and very unsuccessful. Amoros-Litti never actually happened as far as I know.
Maybe my memory plays tricks on me, but when did they play together? Littbarski joined RC Paris for a year and then went back to Cologne and in the end played a few years in Japan. I'm pretty sure Amoros never played for Paris or outside of France? I think you confused Bossis and Amoros there.I know you rate Robben closer to Maradona/Messi. The point remains the same, Littbarski with Amoros are two world class players who already played together. A world class pairing compared to Robben-Rafael where only one part is world class.
Regarding the game. I'd say it's a 0-0 more often than a football game should be. I rate TRV's attack better and it gets a lot of creative support from midfield, maybe more than what's good for the balance of the team. But I also think that Scirea is more likely to organise a flawless defense and he has more protection from midfield, so if I had to choose, I'd probably give Annah a slight edge and say Scirea will help keep a clean sheet that one time more often. Not entirely sure, if that slight edge is big enough to give him my vote though.