WhyYouGottaBeSoRuud?
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2021
- Messages
- 249
Because he'd be on a free I think.Why is Tielemans still highly rated? He’s average
Because he'd be on a free I think.Why is Tielemans still highly rated? He’s average
Because he'd be on a free I think.
He’s great in the press, a very capable passer and crosser and has an incredible work rate and ethic that is hard to find.
Tielemans is a free agent so relegation will not affect his price or availability. The rumours are that he is looking for huge money. !!Why is Tielemans still highly rated? He’s average
Ward-Prowse would be a great move, much rather this than Sabitzer. Solid for around 5-10 league goals from midfield.
He's a grafter and feel we're lacking that edge of the box mercenary in our team for cutbacks and would be great for setpieces.
He's good at one thing, passing the ball successfully to teammates, but that one thing would make him a unicorn in this side.Why is Tielemans still highly rated? He’s average
He's good at one thing, passing the ball successfully to teammates, but that one thing would make him a unicorn in this side.
If you took Fred and magically made him a good passer, taught him how to shoot, and he became an expert at dead ball situations, he’d be JWP. People ask if he would solve our perennial midfield quandary, well, he’d be an upgrade over 3 players who feature regularly, so I’d call it a net gain.He’s great in the press, a very capable passer and crosser and has an incredible work rate and ethic that is hard to find.
Lavia, Maddison, Paqueta (but his position is not a priority|, as for Rice I would want him only if really cheap and I doubt that he is ok to play second fiddle.
Does he solve either of our two big midfield issues is the question though
@croadyman WAPR has said essentially what I would have said in response to you.If you took Fred and magically made him a good passer, taught him how to shoot, and he became an expert at dead ball situations, he’d be JWP. People ask if he would solve our perennial midfield quandary, well, he’d be an upgrade over 3 players who feature regularly, so I’d call it a net gain.
If you took Fred and magically made him a good passer, taught him how to shoot, and he became an expert at dead ball situations, he’d be JWP. People ask if he would solve our perennial midfield quandary, well, he’d be an upgrade over 3 players who feature regularly, so I’d call it a net gain.
I’m intrigued by Paqueta.
He was arguably the better player out of him and Bruno Guimaraes at Lyon, or so I’ve been told and also from looking myself at their comparable match stats/ratings.
He’s had a tough time at West Ham, but he could be a signing we can snap up on the cheap if they go down and he has the ability to play as an 8 and cover Bruno in the 10 position. Hard worker, technically great, tenacious tackler, scores goals, Brazilian flair, what’s not to like?
My preference would still be someone like De Jong or Bennacer, but he’d be a decent shout if those aren’t attainable.
And Bruno failed at Udinese. People developer differentlyHe did already fail at Milan remember. Plus I’m sure he’s 25/26. Not that it matters much but his trajectory isn’t very upwards.
And Bruno failed at Udinese. People developer differently
He did already fail at Milan remember. Plus I’m sure he’s 25/26. Not that it matters much but his trajectory isn’t very upwards.
And Bruno failed at Udinese. People developer differently
Fred stans like to point out that Fred plays for Brazil. You could begin there.I don't even know where to begin here, but this is just wrong.
Leicester slipping towards relegation. Maddison is going to be in demand if so.
What about onana?No one from Everton, that's for sure.
Oh and JWP is bang average apart from being world-class at freekicks.
Totally agree, everytime I have seen him he looks passive and soft, not a battler . I don't see a lot of them so may be wrong but my overall opinion is not worth chasing at all.Why is Tielemans still highly rated? He’s average
How do you guys think Mount and Maddison would do in ETHs system?
I am not blown away by either to be honest…
I don't really get the clamour for Maddison. He's very good but he doesn't solve any pressing needs in the squad right now, and we do still have a number of these issues that need to be addressed.
No one from Cafe seems to be interested in Ndidi. I bet in last couple of seasons everyone wanted him , some instead of Casemiro.
Meslier is really bad.Lavia and Livramento at Southampton
Maddison at Leicester
Johnson at Forest
Meslier at Leeds
Rice at West Ham
Lavia and Livramento at Southampton
Maddison at Leicester
Johnson at Forest
Meslier at Leeds
Rice at West Ham
Meslier is really bad.
Lavia is one we should be looking at very seriously, he's looked super impressive most times I've seen him which is no mean feat given the team he's currently in and who he's being coached by. Would cost probably half of what we'd be quoted for Caicedo.
No one from Cafe seems to be interested in Ndidi. I bet in last couple of seasons everyone wanted him , some instead of Casemiro.
I just don't buy this at all. Ndidi has never been very good with passing the ball, being creative, forward thinking, what he was good at was running around like a demon, intercepting, winning the ball back, his demise has culminated due to what looks to me like putting in sub par performances. Now you can say that's due to lack of fitness, or BR telling him to run less, but inevitably it's Ndidi that makes the decisions. BR dropped Ndidi because he was crap, his mistakes last week wasn't due to BR training, it was lack of concentration and focus and giving up in a challenge.
Lavia is one we should be looking at very seriously, he's looked super impressive most times I've seen him which is no mean feat given the team he's currently in and who he's being coached by. Would cost probably half of what we'd be quoted for Caicedo.