Longlivekeano said:Spend 20 million pounds on Lennon. He's worth it and comes with no baggage nor cultural adjustment baggage issues that will come together with exotic players like Nani, Quaresma, Joaquin...
Besides, one trickster in Ronaldo is enough. Two might disrupt the team's balance. We need a direct penetrative winger and I feel that Lennon fits the bill perfectly with his blistering pace.
Lennon is already twice the player simao is. In fact simao is like ribery, overrated and ...shit.devilish said:Its too much money for a winger who isnt half as good as the likes of Ronaldo or even Simao.
Freak said:Lennon is already twice the player simao is. In fact simao is like ribery, overrated and ...shit.
Great postdevilish said:Lennon is overrated. He is fast, but technically wise Im not truly impressed with him, certianly not enough to spend 20m for him. Simao may not be twice as good as Lennon (that comment was reserved for Ronaldo) but he is technically gifted, he is hardworking, he is a great crosser of the ball and can play on both flanks. He is also cheaper and had already played with Ronaldo with successful results.
Stating that if all English players are as good as how the British people sees them then England would have won 10 world cups at a row.
Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber said:Great post
SWP would have been pretty good at OT. Yet He is still an average player comapred to a Ronaldo.Just like Lennon, who as he is now, is not even better than SWP.devilish said:Lennon would do well at OT.....but 20m is just too much for him.
That is good to have. But we should have the really talented or effective ones. Lennon is not that talented. Plus I'm yet to be convinced of his overall effectiveness. Since his end product is not very good. In terms of crosses...A SWP clone if you ask me...I'd rather have Bentley tbh.......Meanwhile we need to replace Giggs with another Ronaldo. The type of talent no English player seems to possess.devilish said:Not to forget that its good to have a good mix of foreign and British based talent in the team. Ok English talent tend to be loyal, hardworking etc but Southern European talent has that kind of shrewdness (just look at Ronaldo against Middlesbrough) that British talent currently lack and which can make you win games. Having the right balance is the key to success.
Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber said:SWP would have been pretty good at OT. Yet He is still an average player comapred to a Ronaldo.Just like Lennon, who as he is now, is not even better than SWP.
That is good to have. But we should have the really talented or effective ones. Lennon is not that talented. Plus I'm yet to be convinced of his overall effectiveness. Since his end product is not very good. In terms of crosses...A SWP clone if you ask me...I'd rather have Bentley tbh.......Meanwhile we need to replace Giggs with another Ronaldo. The type of talent no English player seems to possess.
Yeah I agree completely.I can't be sure that Nani or Quaresma[if we sign ] will not say he wants to go to Real Madrid or Barca one day .Longlivekeano said:Spend 20 million pounds on Lennon. He's worth it and comes with no baggage nor cultural adjustment baggage issues that will come together with exotic players like Nani, Quaresma, Joaquin...
Besides, one trickster in Ronaldo is enough. Two might disrupt the team's balance. We need a direct penetrative winger and I feel that Lennon fits the bill perfectly with his blistering pace.
amit_onlymanutd said:Yeah I agree completely.I can't be sure that Nani or Quaresma[if we sign ] will not say he wants to go to Real Madrid or Barca one day .
Lennon would be a class signing even at 20 mil quids.Many here don't rate him saying that he is English and over-rated but he is only 19 years old and clearly will improve by miles if he comes to United.
Imo Lennon can improve a lot at United.I agree he has some flaws in his game and he would cost 25 mil pounds which is a rip off.But he is only 18 or 19.I am not saying we should not sign Nani.devilish said:Bollocks.
A) Loyalty isnt tied with someone's nationality. There had been many loyal "foreigners" (Zola, Cantona, Henry and Ole to mention a few) in the EPL as much as there were English players who had betrayed the trust of their clubs and signed for someone else (Mcmanaman and Sol Campbell).
B) Lets say that Ronaldo leaves Manchester United during Summer would anyone of you consider signing Ronaldo as a "bad" deal. I mean the boy would have given us 4 great years + 25 - 30m profit. Would you not sign someone like him?
Now lets change the subject. If Aaron Lennon was lets say Portuguese would you rate him in the same way you do? I much doubt it.
I believe that we should try to sign the best talent and the right prices. Lennon is good but at 20m he is a rip off. There is much better talent around at that price or even lower.
Barry Red said:I don't often post in this forum, but here's one that's open to discussion...
I think the club's biggest transfer problem will be replacing Ryan Giggs when the time comes.
Forget the next Ruud van Nistelroy, there's plenty of top class strikers out there who would do well in our squad - Torres, Huntelaar, Berbatov etc. etc. etc. All the club has to do is splash the cash. I am more worried about replacing Giggsy. Quite simply I haven't seen anyone like him out there - there are plenty of skilful wingers, good attacking midfielders etc. but I haven't seen anyone as versatile as Ryan.
I know his hamstring problems seem to be under control but who knows what the future holds? Injuries take longer to heal when you are in your thirties and I really feel that the club ought to have some kind of fallback plan.
amit_onlymanutd said:Imo Lennon can improve a lot at United.I agree he has some flaws in his game.But he is only 18 or 19.I am not saying we should not sign Nani.
Infact Sporting Lisbon want only 12 mil pounds for Nani.I would definitely sign Nani for 12 mil quids.
There is almost no chance of getting Messi.red2deadboy said:If we fail to get Messi i think Hatem Ben Arfa or Ryan Babel would be good understudies as both are technically good and have pace to burn. Giggs has another 1 or 2 seasons in him so a young understudy would fit the bill just right instead of a replacement.
amit_onlymanutd said:There is almost no chance of getting Messi.
RedRonaldo said:Lets sign Messi to replace Giggs, Kaka to replace Scholes, and Buffon to replace VDS.
Easy.
I don't often post in this forum, but here's one that's open to discussion...
I think the club's biggest transfer problem will be replacing Ryan Giggs when the time comes.
Forget the next Ruud van Nistelroy, there's plenty of top class strikers out there who would do well in our squad - Torres, Huntelaar, Berbatov etc. etc. etc. All the club has to do is splash the cash. I am more worried about replacing Giggsy. Quite simply I haven't seen anyone like him out there - there are plenty of skilful wingers, good attacking midfielders etc. but I haven't seen anyone as versatile as Ryan.
I know his hamstring problems seem to be under control but who knows what the future holds? Injuries take longer to heal when you are in your thirties and I really feel that the club ought to have some kind of fallback plan.
Ummm..... I rather think that some of you are not being entirely serious, which is why I rarely post here.
Only one person seemed to feel that players improve when they come to United and that is normally the case (although we could all think of some exceptions to that rule!!). And only one person took a look at players in the championship.
We all know about Ribery and Messi and Nani and a few other obvious candidates but I was hoping for nominations of some younger up-and-coming players. Isn't there anyone who has the potential to develop into the kind of player to replace Giggsy?
You are so right. Though according to Barry Red they must be approaching the end of glorious careers...Ronaldo on the left buy a good right winger problem solved let them switch during matches to add to the headache
Ask Fred the Red. He seemedAnybody seen enough of Michael Kightly at Wolves to say if he's good enough?