- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 37,305
Correction.
We gave him full reign.
Year1: EL and LC trophies
Year2: 2nd in the EPL and runner up FA Cup
Full reign was taken away.
Year3: out of the LC, 7th place in the EPL.
Correction.
We gave him full reign.
Year1: EL and LC trophies
Year2: 2nd in the EPL and runner up FA Cup
Full reign was taken away.
Year3: out of the LC, 7th place in the EPL.
Correction.
We gave him full reign.
Year1: EL and LC trophies
Year2: 2nd in the EPL and runner up FA Cup
Full reign was taken away.
Year3: out of the LC, 7th place in the EPL.
It's more like a compost heap driving a bus.I was listening to the totally football podcast and one of the guests described the effect of Mourhinos dour and negative demeanour, attitude and tactics were akin to being chased by an erupting volcano, you may be able to outrun it for a while but the the non stop lava and poisonous gases will get you in the end. A good analogy and how it’s kind of felt for me during his tenure
When you come to think of it, even the first season wasn't all that good tbh.
We didn't get into CL for being one of the 4 best teams in the league, but by barely scraping wins for a 2nd tier European trophy against a much, much weaker opposition.
It's a very misleading stat. Even a pass to Fullback is considered as long ball. Box is 18 yards and any pass above 25 yards is considered as long pass. So even a pass to FB hugging touchline is a long pass.
Last season's 2nd place was a good achievement (I guess) but a lot depends on the context.
We finished 2nd, yet we weren't challenging for the title. We went full throttle in the league, I think in order to mask that shameful exit to Sevilla in CL.
Liverpool had their eyes set on CL, they played just enough in the league to finish inside top 4, not bothered by the exact spot as long as it's inside the top 4.
Chelsea were in a huge turmoil, manager falling out with everyone and their dog. Yet still they did beat us in FA Cup final.
Arsenal players gave up the moment it was revealed that AW will be leaving.
You can only really say Spurs underperformed, but then again you can attribute that to them playing on the Wembley.
And yeah, we looked like shiit hence why them pundits were touting us as "the worst looking team (play wise) to have finished 2nd".
Not on whoscored, I checked several matches to be sure. You can check yourself by going into chalkboard.
Chalkboard on whoscored or different site?
Not saying De Gea don't kick the ball long as he does it more often that not, just saying how long ball is measure in whoscored site which doesn't make sense as a good pass to fullback is also a long pass according to them.
People changing their vote are the absolute worst and just total kneejerkers. The only thing people should have done was change their vote to yes - had they picked one of the other two options - and left it at that. He’s done and that’s that.
Chalkboard on whoscored. I checked the stats because I wanted to do more in depth by counting the direction for each long pass but realised quickly it was way too much work. De Gea in the last 5 games had 100+ long passes.
People acted like Spurs and Liverpool were better than us. We were ahead of both the entire season. Liverpool couldn't beat us. We beat every team in the league. People bash Lukaku now but he was missing for the FA Cup final and it was costly. Liverpool were in danger of falling out of the top 4 until the last game of the season. Wembley had nothing to do with Spurs form as they adapted to it not too long into the season.
How is that for context?
It was costly because we had no plan B. For the period with Lukaky out injured we stuck Rashford up top without changing strategy, it's not like anyone expected that to be a success. We have different types of strikers, the key is to manage the squad and make sure that if your first choice is injured you have an alternative that knows what's expected and that the team can change style to suit the other strikers. Sticking your striker turned left/right winger back as a striker and pretending he's an an entirely different player is usually not going to help.
Ref Tottenham and Liverpool: Fair enough, we can isolate them and look at an individual season and miss the entire point that everyone is trying to make.
It's all about progress, building towards something. Progress rarely happens instantly. Our second place last season was a one off, bit like Everton finishing 4th. Tottenham, having a limited budget both in terms of wages and transfer fees, will struggle to compete over time. Liverpool, who have splashed some serious cash on both transfer fees and wages are expected to compete for trophies. They are undefeated in their last 27 league games at home, it would surprise me if they aren't mounting a title challenge this season, given the way they are performing i expect them to compete with City. Doubt they will win, but they will come a lot closer than we were last season.
90 minutes away from it being a pretty shite season.When you come to think of it, even the first season wasn't all that good tbh.
We didn't get into CL for being one of the 4 best teams in the league, but by barely scraping wins for a 2nd tier European trophy against a much, much weaker opposition.
I checked that:
1:1 away + 1:0 at home vs. Rostow
1:1 away + 2:1 after extra time vs. Anderlecht (Quarters)
0:1 away + 1:1 vs Vigo (Semis)
2:0 vs Ajax (who were barely advancing vs Lyon Schalke and Kopenhagen)
Overall advancing by 1 goal vs Rostow and Vigo and 1 goal in extra time vs Anderlecht. That's not convincing at all especially considering Pogba had cost more than Rostow + Anderlecht squad combined.
I'd say it simply so: ManUtd under Mourinho despite winning titles doesn't play like a Champion.
Well if we wanted real progress we needed to add width and defenders that can help build up. Doesn't totally excuse our poor start but I dont get what people really expected. We needed to add new dimensions to the team through recruitment and it didn't really happen. Anyway, lets hope Dalot has a good game tomorrow.
Agreed. LVG had a great track record with Ajax and Bayern too, didn't mean he was right for us.He's spot on. I don't care what he's won at other clubs. I am not a Porto, Inter or Chelsea fan. I'm a Manchester United fan, and right now, Manchester United are pretty shite under him.
There's no system in place to ensure progress, and that's not about transfer spending it's about the manager. Why has Lukaku gone backwards, Pogba, why do we look worse off than we did last season, why isn't there a clear pattern in what we're trying to achieve. Lack of improvement in one area can explain the team not reaching new heights, not falling to new lows.
But, but, but he wasn't backed! Mourinho is the only manager who can spend mega bucks and still cry pauper and have fans lap it up. We have overall been pretty average in his tenure. We play a very tepid brand of football where I think the players aren't fully free and that is why you can see us look so unsure until it's desperate times and we have to go gung ho. We need to move on from him as soon as possible and get the feel good factor back at the club.
People acted like Spurs and Liverpool were better than us. We were ahead of both the entire season. Liverpool couldn't beat us. We beat every team in the league. People bash Lukaku now but he was missing for the FA Cup final and it was costly. Liverpool were in danger of falling out of the top 4 until the last game of the season. Wembley had nothing to do with Spurs form as they adapted to it not too long into the season.
How is that for context?
Yeah the wheels were already coming off last season weren't we. We started off winning all those games 4-0 but playing very direct, pragmatic football which was obviously miles behind City's. The longer the season went on, the worse we looked.Yet none of that challenges anything I've said, does it?
Now you're bs-ing. Considering Lukaku's track record against big teams, it's still debatable whether him missing that game was a blow or a blessing in disguise.
In case you didn't get it, it was my point exactly, they were more focused to keep their players ready and avoid potential injuries for the sake of advancing in CL.
I mean you can keep telling to yourself that playing on Wembley (pitch is both wider and longer) had nothing to do with Spurs underperforming, but that's not the case.
Us beating every other team in the league is a pretty good achievement, but it won't change the fact we looked absolutely diabolical, playing some absolutely soul crushing football whilst doing so.
I'm curious would have our 2nd spot and a crack at Chelsea in FA Cup final, for a 4th place finish and a chance at Madrid in CL final?
Yet none of that challenges anything I've said, does it?
Now you're bs-ing. Considering Lukaku's track record against big teams, it's still debatable whether him missing that game was a blow or a blessing in disguise.
In case you didn't get it, it was my point exactly, they were more focused to keep their players ready and avoid potential injuries for the sake of advancing in CL.
I mean you can keep telling to yourself that playing on Wembley (pitch is both wider and longer) had nothing to do with Spurs underperforming, but that's not the case.
Us beating every other team in the league is a pretty good achievement, but it won't change the fact we looked absolutely diabolical, playing some absolutely soul crushing football whilst doing so.
I'm curious would have our 2nd spot and a crack at Chelsea in FA Cup final, for a 4th place finish and a chance at Madrid in CL final?
Well when the manager asks for proper wingers and defenders to help build up and doesn't get it you lose big dimensions to your team....
I think LVG with this team would be doing better than Jose. Which is so sad on many levels.
May I ask you:-He literally scored against Chelsea last year and I think he even won man of the match. Yes we did miss Lukaku against Chelsea and only bullshit revisionists will try to deny it.
We were better than every other team apart from City. Spurs were just fine at Wembley and we were ahead of Liverpool the entire season so the bollocks about them resting players doesn’t run.
I checked that:
1:1 away + 1:0 at home vs. Rostow
1:1 away + 2:1 after extra time vs. Anderlecht (Quarters)
0:1 away + 1:1 vs Vigo (Semis)
2:0 vs Ajax (who were barely advancing vs Lyon Schalke and Kopenhagen)
Overall advancing by 1 goal vs Rostow and Vigo and 1 goal in extra time vs Anderlecht. That's not convincing at all especially considering Pogba had cost more than Rostow + Anderlecht squad combined.
I'd say it simply so: ManUtd under Mourinho despite winning titles doesn't play like a Champion.
90 minutes away from it being a pretty shite season.
Go back to the threads during the first season. Plenty of us weren’t happy with what was going on. I personally was pretty discouraged from about 3 months in and I could see absolutely no patterns in our play (bar bits of magic from Zlatan).
May I ask you:-
Do you want Jose to be given more time as Man Utd manager and what do you think he will bring to us if given a huge transfer budget in January/summer? Considering he's been here nearly 3 seasons now.
Which proper wingers did he ask for during the summer ? You don't lose big dimensions, you don't regress badly, at worst you should be stuck at status quo
I think LVG with this team would be doing better than Jose. Which is so sad on many levels.
Yeah the wheels were already coming off last season weren't we. We started off winning all those games 4-0 but playing very direct, pragmatic football which was obviously miles behind City's. The longer the season went on, the worse we looked.
I'd imagine that, if you excluded the first 10 games (so excluded our amazing start), we'd have been hanging on for fourth spot in the final table. Obviously those first 10 games are just as valid as the rest of the season but we clearly went into decline afterwards. It's a bit reminiscent of the 85/86 season, when United won all their first 10 games and ended up hanging on to fourth spot.
Even in May, people were demanding Mourinho leave and predicting the nightmare we'd endure this season. Don't think any of us expected it'd be this bad though.
Well the ones we know about are Willian and Perisic. He wanted fullbacks as well. We badly need width, everyone can see it. Obviously he wanted defenders as well and wants better build up from deeper areas. Something both Willian and Perisic can help with as well.
They don't do it like Squawka, shame as it was great site.
Just to get better context I checked his last few games.
snip
So yeah, lot of long passes but without doing calculation it looks like more than 90% of them are ground passes which means more likely it's passed to Fullback or winger.
So we wanted Perisic this august ? Which fullback did he want ? Where's the credible info to back up any of this. Apart from the centre back there's nothing about attacking players, we even have Mourinho himself stating there were no need for more attacking players as long as no one leaves.