dove
New Member
- Joined
- May 15, 2013
- Messages
- 7,899
And it most likely was, if you use instagram you will know itValencia liked a post on Instagram claiming for the sack of Mou.
Of course, he said it was a mistake.
And it most likely was, if you use instagram you will know itValencia liked a post on Instagram claiming for the sack of Mou.
Of course, he said it was a mistake.
Yes I do kind of stop reading from time to time, because I wonder where your point is going. If they are not winners then they must not be that good? If they are good and you believe that why not get another manager to get a better tune out of them then? It’s a simple why is this more beneficial to keep this guy in? It proves nothing but stubbornness. We have a higher chance of getting relegated than winning the league this season and I don’t see what that would prove to anyone. Maybe then Mourinho could try his luck of managing Mitrovic and James Chester in the Championship?
I didn’t ask what Hazard has given Chelsea I asked if he is more of a winner? I’m sure Pogba’s trophy cabinet says different. Selling 5 players from LVG’s squad does not answer this player power question as like I said. Only De Gea; Chuckle Bro’s; Young and Fellaini have lasted all three managers and I doubt Jones is kicking up a fuss because he’s no longer taking corners.
There are no guarantees in life. Our future will depend on the change we make. But fear of making the wrong decision shouldn't lead to a refusal to solve the problems that exist.There's no guarantee the rebuilding works, even with a new set of staff and a new sets of players.
For me this is the biggest issue. People assume that changes are always for the better. It can go both ways. Even if we try to go back to our roots and tradition it's not a guarantee it will work.
Promoting more academy players? It still depends on the raw materials, does our batch of youngsters has the potential to become first team squad on merit?
Plyaing attacking football? Will it be guaranteed that we'll play better and have the result to back our performance?
Will the new dof actuallly is the right person? Or will he create and even bigger mess?
Does our problems is due to mourinho only? Who knows that we might actually be worse if not for Mourinho? And dont laugh, there are people that says they miss lvg era.
It isn't quality. They are giving everything, the problem is right now that is everything they have. Unhappy, unmotivated, disenchanted workers will never perform at the same level as happy, motivated and engaged onesYep. They might not be giving absolutely everything, but that wouldn't change much. The problem is not the lack of trying, it's the quality. They do want to win. It's just not working.
@el3mel you don't seem to understand. Player power isn't something the club can give or what, it's inherent in the fact that players are, well, the players. Imagine if Warnock were to fell out with his players at cardiff, what do you think would happen? Cardiff could either A) back Warnock, write the season off(read: finish dead last and get relegated) and use the next two transfer windows to replace most of the team. B) sack Warnock and try to save the season...
Or C)(what clubs would generally do in this situation) try to negotiate a temporary truce between team and manager, which would generally require both parties to take a step back and meet in the middle and is usually a temporary measure meant to work until such time as the club has the opportunity to resolve it(read: until they can either replace the manager, or start replacing the players)
It isn't quality. They are giving everything, the problem is right now that is everything they have. Unhappy, unmotivated, disenchanted workers will never perform at the same level as happy, motivated and engaged ones
@el3mel you don't seem to understand. Player power isn't something the club can give or what, it's inherent in the fact that players are, well, the players. Imagine if Warnock were to fell out with his players at cardiff, what do you think would happen? Cardiff could either A) back Warnock, write the season off(read: finish dead last and get relegated) and use the next two transfer windows to replace most of the team. B) sack Warnock and try to save the season...
Or C)(what clubs would generally do in this situation) try to negotiate a temporary truce between team and manager, which would generally require both parties to take a step back and meet in the middle and is usually a temporary measure meant to work until such time as the club has the opportunity to resolve it(read: until they can either replace the manager, or start replacing the players)
Again, you don't seem to understand. Players are NOT intentionally underperforming because they want to get rid of the manager. They quite simply aren't engaged anymore, they're literally unable to really listen to him anymore. Forcing the issue like that is unlikely to work. Far more likely to further alienate the players in fact. And most of them are not playing for their careers. If they're out at United they'll find another team(plus, i'd like to see United act like this towards Mr Alexis "club still owes me £100m" Sanchez)If the club gives full support to the current manager and made it clear to the players he's not leaving and anyone who isn't following him will be out, the players will give up and start performing for their career, even if the board is planning behind doors for managerial chage later on. Leave it like it's, letting the problems in dressing room continue then just do the managerial change at the end will finally give the player the feeling they have enough power to push out any manager they don't like on their own.
Last season, a weaker squad finished second, comfortably, walked the CL group and got to the final of the FA Cup. Can't see us doing that this season. That's on the manager and not the players. And all this - when last season too, the argument was that Jose wasn't getting the best out of the options he had. How many can say that his tactics and selections aren't baffling?
Now, let me give you an analogy.
Say you work for an enterprise you really like. They pay you fabulously, treat you well, you get along with all your colleagues and stakeholders etc. and are content to stay there for a long time. Next thing you know, you get put under a manager that hangs you out to dry at the drop of a hat, asks you to work in ways you know are sub-optimal and destined to fail and you find yourself dropping behind your company's competition as a result. You also find that all your team-mates are similarly frustrated. This affects company morale of course and people are just miserable in office - and spend the post-office drinks sessions to exchange horror stories. What do you do? In the corporate world, you'd quit and find another job OR go to your seniors and ask for your manager to be sacked / replaced. If the seniors have any sense, they accede and remove the manager. But what if quitting and moving isn't the easiest option? What if it requires you to pay off an employment bond / get your next employer to pay it off?
The management's failure to remove your manager wouldn't mean you "stop trying" or "try to fail" because it kills your career too. But what else can be expected from the company and your team, apart from failure? You see it daily -and frustration keeps rising, but hey, you're stuck! With time, you will find your energy levels lower and your frustrations resulting in occasional pettiness. You're still doing the best you can, but performance levels start dipping. It's inevitable.
For the record, I've seen such situations even in Management Consulting, where a bad manager / Principal can ruin the output of a team of absolutely brilliant consultants who're trying their best, but are suffering because of the person/persons above.
Remember the old credo: If you're facing a lot of attrition in a team, look at the manager first as the root cause.
Remember that players don't select the team and nor do they select formations and tactics. They are also aware that a failure to adhere to the manager's diktats will result in their being dropped - and therefore, their value and attractiveness to other clubs also dropping. How do you think this won't affect motivation?
As for the players - remember that a lot of these came at Mou's demand - Pogba, Lukaku, Alexis, Bailly, Lindelöf, Matic, Fred and now Dalot, are all Mou signings. How many is he able to get a tune out of and how many are living up to the potential that the world knows they have? Lukaku's numbers were better for Everton, I think and Alexis' fall has been legendary. Pogba is our best player - and Mou can't stop fighting with him and demanding he be shot? He wanted Shaw sold (second best behind Pogba now). He bemoans the lack of "leaders" and captains the mute Valencia.
It's clear as day - the squad is pulling on, but the tactics and selections are baffling and they're demotivated with a toxic atmosphere and environment. There's no way a new manager doesn't fix some of the issues - and a good one, most of them. Squad gaps may remain, but who doesn't have those? Who is Liverpool's midfield creator? Milner? Wijnaldum? Yet, they're so far ahead of us, it's not funny!
Again, you don't seem to understand. Players are NOT intentionally underperforming because they want to get rid of the manager. They quite simply aren't engaged anymore, they're literally unable to really listen to him anymore. Forcing the issue like that is unlikely to work. Far more likely to further alienate the players in fact. And most of them are not playing for their careers. If they're out at United they'll find another team(plus, i'd like to see United act like this towards Mr Alexis "club still owes me £100m" Sanchez)
And no, players aren't kids. They aren't going to think "oooh we can get managers sacked now!" That's not how it works. They knew they can the manager sacked all along - but getting the manager sacked implies failure. Nobody actually wants to fail. "Getting the manager sacked" isn't a conscious decision made overnight because the "the boss was mean to me yesterday", it's the consequence of a protracted, toxic working relationship*
*Unless the player in question is someone like Messi. Then yes, he could get managers sacked on a whim. But then again, if you had something like that on your team, would you be willing to lose it?
There are no guarantees in life. Our future will depend on the change we make. But fear of making the wrong decision shouldn't lead to a refusal to solve the problems that exist.
@el3mel you don't seem to understand. Player power isn't something the club can give or what, it's inherent in the fact that players are, well, the players. Imagine if Warnock were to fell out with his players at cardiff, what do you think would happen? Cardiff could either A) back Warnock, write the season off(read: finish dead last and get relegated) and use the next two transfer windows to replace most of the team. B) sack Warnock and try to save the season...
Or C)(what clubs would generally do in this situation) try to negotiate a temporary truce between team and manager, which would generally require both parties to take a step back and meet in the middle and is usually a temporary measure meant to work until such time as the club has the opportunity to resolve it(read: until they can either replace the manager, or start replacing the players)
It isn't quality. They are giving everything, the problem is right now that is everything they have. Unhappy, unmotivated, disenchanted workers will never perform at the same level as happy, motivated and engaged ones
When SAF took over United in 1986, it was a team that had won a few Cups and had some good seasons here and there but never looked like realistic Title challengers - possible exception of 85/86, but selling Hughes to Barcelona meant united "finished fourth in a two horse race" - it was a big club that had been in mostly a bad way for decades as opposed to Mourinho taking over a United team that had last won the Title three years previously. Admittedly it was a team that needed a complete rebuild but nowhere near the extent of the job Ferguson had.I just did some background reading and remembered something that struck a chord due to the similarities to the present situation with Mourinho...
In 1987/88 season United finished second in the league - it was Ferguson's first full season as manager.
Edwards had made millions of pounds available to strengthen the squad signing back Mark Hughes as well as Brian McClair, Gary Pallister, Paul Ince, Neil Webb and Danny Wallace.
However in the next season as 1989 drew to a close United's form was so bad, occupying 15th place in the league on Christmas Day, that there were continued calls from the fans for Alex Ferguson to be sacked. Fans also demanded Martin Edwards' resignation.
We all know how things then panned out. No doubt some of Jose's dwindling support is hoping that this is a similar moment and if we just hold firm success is around the corner.
For me however there are a number of key differences...
Youth development - Ferguson had sorted out the youth development of the team, making it more professional and was building a growing network of scouts rather than just depending on the school network to spot talent. He was already assembling a group of young players who would be named the class of 92.
Squad approach - An abiding feature for me watching United train back in Fergusons time was that everyone trained together. It was not a case of having a first 11 and also-rans. Young players trained the same way and were integrated into the team the same way.
Behind closed doors - Ferguson had a massive temper, particularly in his early years, but he kept his criticism out of the public domain so no player felt publicly humiliated. Jose has not acted like this.
Unfortunate Injuries - Ferguson's worst period coincided with a bad run of injuries and the squad lacked the depth to compensate at the time. Jose doesn't have that excuse.
Any other thoughts on why this moment is not like '89?
Not many people have changed their vote I don't think, just more new voters are voting 'Yes' from what I can tell.The 'in' crowd is down from 11% to 10%, good stuff. Logic will always prevail blind arrogance.
Skriniar and the other was Koulibaly…
I agree with most of that but 'changing for the sake of changing' applies if you're relatively content with your current status. When you're not, you need act and make changes. Right now I personally we need change rather than it being something we could do with.true, but the changes should be full calculated, lessons should be learnt on what's wrong the past 5 years, proper plans, instead of just change for the sake of change itself
Anyone here silently wishing United go lose a few more games just to get Mourinho sacked? Have we reached that level yet? Like in the last few months of Van Gaal tenure.
No need to wish for us to lose, we'll have enough crap results under him to give the board plenty of opportunity to pull the trigger. Whether they will or not is a different matter.
Though that said if defeat to Newcastle got him sacked I'd sign up for that in an absolute instant. Going to be very interesting to see how our players perform in this one, if they really want him gone a defeat at home to them you'd think would do it.
And it most likely was, if you use instagram you will know it
It just made up though. How many times did we hear LVG was down to his last match? I'm starting to have the feeling Jose will last the season or until top 4 is not possible. Then Carrick/McKenna until the end of the season followed by a new hire next summer. The bigger question is, will Pogba be sold in January?When a board finds itself saying the next x number of games will decide a manager's future, the jig is up. We are wasting our time.
Ex players' take:
Giggsy (4. oct '18):
During a press conference to announce the Wales squad, Giggs shrugged off the comment when asked if Mourinho should go. He said: "No. They're going through a tough time at the moment.
"I said that last time, where do they go? Change now and you'll be in the same position in a year or two years quite possibly.
"I believe he should keep his job."
Scholesy (2. oct '18):
Speaking to BT Sport in the build-up to the Valencia game, Scholes said: “I’m actually sat here surprised he (Mourinho) survived after Saturday the performance was that bad.
“He’s coming out in press conferences, he’s constantly having a go at players, he’s having a go at people above him because he’s not getting what he wants and I think his mouth is probably out of control and I think he’s embarrassing the club.”
Gazza
The 'in' crowd is down from 11% to 10%, good stuff. Logic will always prevail blind arrogance.
Obviously you have never had a crap manager at the helm.Disagree. We have seen several dressing room lossing incidents at various clubs last couple of seasons that have all the marks of players intentionally doing it then instantly playing well the next day the manager goes. Players can't make that shift that quick from crap to great in few says like what happened with Mourinho, Conte and Ranieri last few seasons. If you think they aren't doing it on purpose at times then I have to say you're very trustful person in general then.
It doesn't affect the players' career much as well, as the full blame will be laid at the manager's doors not them. No one blames Hazard for the 2015/2016 season for example.