The "most important" fans of the club

Ok so the consensus is that non Manchester/matchgoing fans are unimportant. Only those who were lucky enough to be born in Manchester/ afford the expenses to go to games regularly from another country are the important ones. Cool.

Not unimportant, less important.

There's a huge difference.
 
That goes without saying. The issue starts when instead of simply suggesting that regular match going fans are important for a club, someone decides to shit on foreigners that go to games, sometimes by making sacrifices. It's not as if there isn't a fair amount of mancunians or british fans that are only able to go to few games. It's not needed to shit on someone in order to value someone else and the reality of the matter is that both are as important as the other for different reasons.

The few thousands of away match going fans are important for the team but they are no more important than the +60k that goes to home game who are themselves no more important than the millions that watch every games on TV. And the reason is that they all fill different crucial needs, in terms of support, money and notoriety for the club.

Who is shitting on foreigners that go to games? Nobody in this thread, as far as I can see. The opposite, if anything.

The Radcliffe comments are just an appeal to what a hell of a lot of people think matters in a football club. And that’s its historic roots to the community in which it is based. And I can’t see anything wrong with that. A club can be rooted in a community and welcoming to fans from overseas at the same time. In fact, that’s historically been very much the case at Manchester United.
 
Being thousands of miles away from Manchester and still following the club I fell in love with as much as I do without any heritage being passed on to me from my parents or family members and supporting it whether in form of spending money or making sacrifices on a daily basis by watching them in the darkest hours which affects not only my job but also many other things, I could easily say I’m as equally important as any other fan from Manchester.

BUT i still believe the club belongs to Manchester and it’s people first and foremost. The sense of belonging to the club the people and the community must have is something they can only feel. So I understand some posters saying something like that as harsh and condescending as it sounds. I can imagine if a football club from my town/area becomes a global giant and have die hard fans all over still I would feel it belongs to me more than any other fan from far because of that special attachment being a club from my own roots/place.
Nice analysis.
 
Defining importance when it comes to match-going fans is tricky. Someone who travels to every game, home and away, from Cork is definitely forced to make more of a commitment than someone who does the same from Salford. Are the most committed fans the most important?

I do think the core support from local fans shades it because there just aren’t enough travelling fans to fill the stadium every week. As we see at the emptyhad. So yeah, if we’re going with tiers the lad from Salford is just ahead of the lad from Cork. Close though.
The guy from Cork will spend maybe 1/2 nights in a hotel and go on a bender for 2 days therefore he’s bringing more into Manchester than local guy who goes to game and fecks off home after no ?
 
I think this was brought up in the context of the bids for the club.

I also made a point that when you look at the bids they will impact on groups of fans quite differently. This is why it’s not that easy for everyone to turn around and say they’ll quit supporting the club if xy or z happens.

For instance, someone who lives locally will see the good investment in the area and local community would do in such a variety of different ways. That will make a lasting impact well beyond anything that happens on the pitch.

Those who attend matches will feel the benefit of stadium improvements and facilities first hand. They may also get some financial gain due to reduced pricing and an overall improved fan experience and atmosphere.

Then there’s groups who sit in more than one category or who have moved, attend less frequently now or don’t go at all. Of course all these people don’t have to be from Manchester but the connection to the club is different for each individual.

Ultimately all fans are important, that’s obvious, but it’s silly to say that a takeover has an impact on everyone equally because it doesn’t.

That I agree with. It's highly subjective and there isn't a lot of genuinely bad answers.
 
The guy from Cork will spend maybe 1/2 nights in a hotel and go on a bender for 2 days therefore he’s bringing more into Manchester than local guy who goes to game and fecks off home after no ?

If we’re judging them by how much money they spend in the local Manchester economy each year then there’s only one winner and it’s not the guy from Cork.
 
Who is shitting on foreigners that go to games? Nobody in this thread, as far as I can see. The opposite, if anything.

The Radcliffe comments are just an appeal to what a hell of a lot of people think matters in a football club. And that’s its historic roots to the community in which it is based. And I can’t see anything wrong with that. A club can be rooted in a community and welcoming to fans from overseas at the same time. In fact, that’s historically been very much the case at Manchester United.

My post clearly mentioned where the OP comes from, it comes a post from one of the other threads.
 
I think this was brought up in the context of the bids for the club.

I also made a point that when you look at the bids they will impact on groups of fans quite differently. This is why it’s not that easy for everyone to turn around and say they’ll quit supporting the club if xy or z happens.

For instance, someone who lives locally will see the good investment in the area and local community would do in such a variety of different ways. That will make a lasting impact well beyond anything that happens on the pitch.

Those who attend matches will feel the benefit of stadium improvements and facilities first hand. They may also get some financial gain due to reduced pricing and an overall improved fan experience and atmosphere.

Then there’s groups who sit in more than one category or who have moved, attend less frequently now or don’t go at all. Of course all these people don’t have to be from Manchester but the connection to the club is different for each individual.

Ultimately all fans are important, that’s obvious, but it’s silly to say that a takeover has an impact on everyone equally because it doesn’t.

This is fair.

Also, fans' own circumstances and lives impact how they'd view new ownership too. If you are a LGBTQ United fan for example then some of the baggage this state-backed bid carries is going to land a lot closer to home. As is the nastier side of the discussion it has brought, by which I mean a lot of the homophobic abuse you see directed at the likes of Rainbow Reds or that journalist Adam Crafton for being critical.
 
This is fair.

Also, fans' own circumstances and lives impact how they'd view new ownership too. If you are a LGBTQ United fan for example then some of the baggage this state-backed bid carries is going to land a lot closer to home. As is the nastier side of the discussion it has brought, by which I mean a lot of the homophobic abuse you see directed at the likes of Rainbow Reds or that journalist Adam Crafton for being critical.

Yeah absolutely
 
Read a post in one of the various threads about new ownership which proudly stated "the most important fans of the club are from Manchester". I felt it was just wrong to say such a thing given the entity we are. So just want to ask the Caf about this. Do people actually stand with this sort of thing and have any logic or basis? Is there a fan tiering system I should be aware of?
Name and shame this person.
Its tripe, everyone is equally as important, people travel from all over the UK every week to see United. People also travel from all over the world to come see United. So the idea that people that live within 20 minutes of the stadium are more important is absolute hogwash.
 
It would be much easier to understand a reference to a specific post if you quoted the post in question. Otherwise it looks like you’re discussing the general themes in this thread.

Here you have the original posts.

Also as an aside, it's a bit naive to think that Ratcliffe comments are innocent. Manchester United never left Manchester, suggesting otherwise is a typical tactic used by a certain type of politicians.
 
Here you have the original posts.

Also as an aside, it's a bit naive to think that Ratcliffe comments are innocent. Manchester United never left Manchester, suggesting otherwise is a typical tactic used by a certain type of politicians.

How can you read that post and the post he is referring to (where putting the Manchester into Manchester United is apparently xenophobia) and think it supports your claims?
 
So now the Utd fans who love taking the piss out of City fans for their small minded " you don''t even live in Manchester" chants are basically jumping on the same bandwagon.

For about a year now I've been coming to Manchester 3 days a month for work so I reckon I'm now 10% more of a fan than before. Can I have some official Manchester Top Red to validate this please? :)
 
Strange thread. Bit of a dick measuring contest. My wife’s from America and she has mates there asking me to sort cup final tickets or Barca tickets and they’ll fly over. Likewise she has cousins in Pakistan who dream of one day coming to Old Trafford. My good friend moved to China and when I’ve gone to visit the United fans over there go crazy at the pub during united games as much as the Stretford End.

My Dad (who’s um a Liverpool fan) has been football mad all his life too. He’s from East Africa, moved to Manchester in his 20s. Funnily enough he moved here following his mate who chose to move to Manchester because he was a massive United fan. Doesn’t go to games but watches every minute of every game.

Their support is the same as my support as a local ST holder.

Historically the support started by being local. The global fame grew over the decades.

One thing many people don’t realise though. The local fans aren’t BREXIT Fans. There’s a massive diversity. Arguably 10/20% are immigrants/ children of immigrants. A lot of this fan base don’t give a shit that Sir Jim is white and local.
 
How can you read that post and the post he is referring to (where putting the Manchester into Manchester United is apparently xenophobia) and think it supports your claims?

How can you not? At which point do you think that reducing an international fan to someone looking for ding dongs?

To be clear, the moment you use pejorative terms, your intention is obvious.
 
Wish people would fk off with this elitism. It really makes my blood boil.

I once was visiting a massive cave structure in Vietnam. The caretaker of these caves lived in a literal smaller cave with his family. It was not really caveman style. They had chairs and rugs etc but it was a cave. As I passed I saw this family sat around a beat up tv attached to a satellite dish and somehow watching a Man United game. I couldn't believe it. 3 generations. Little kids to old grandmas. Most sat in beat up old Man United shirts they got from who knows where. As I was outside staring they found out I was a United supporter and invited me in. So I missed the cave tour and sat with this family watching United.

I have also been in a shanty town in Kenya. They have literally fk all. But they put together a pub out of scrap metal and they play the games. The whole shanty town comes around on matchday again in their beat up old Manchester United tops and support Manchester United.

I was also in Thailand and was set upon by some scousers who were threatening to knife me for no other reason than I was a United supporter. I thought I was done for but then a few local Man United supporters stepped in and helped me for no other reason than we are brothers.
These stories are repeated all over the world from India to Africa to South America. They are as fervent and loyal and Man United crazy as any fan.

I'm not having that any united supporter is less than because they cant afford to get to a game or they don't buy enough shirts. A United fan is a united fan full stop.
 
How can you not? At which point do you think that reducing an international fan to someone looking for ding dongs?

That.. is not what was said at all? I can’t even imagine how you can get that from the post unless you are looking for an insult.
 
This is the official ranking:

1, Matchgoing local fans.
2, Matchgoing out of towners.
3, Armchair fans who watch legally.
4, Armchair fans who illegally stream the games.
5, Clueless bandwagon jumpers who don't watch the games but for some reason think they are fans.
Think this is pretty much spot on, but must have hit a nerve so (having followed the Caf for years) I'm going to break my newbie duck. So...
What about fans who come from a family of Utd supporters - who grew up going to OT together in the 70s?
What about length of service (45 yrs+) and not even thinking of giving up, even when we were a bit shit?
What about knowing the history of your club?

Surely these have got to count for something (3 to 4, duffer - seriously!?). Just asking for a friend of course...;)
 
That.. is not what was said at all? I can’t even imagine how you can get that from the post unless you are looking for an insult.

So the post didn't show contempt toward international fans?
 
You don’t need to be British to live in Manchester. There’s loads of non-British local residents. Some of whom hold season tickets at Old Trafford.
Exactly. If you cannot be bother upping sticks and moving to Manchester to watch Utd every week then thats on you.
Dont dare try to call yourself a fan. In fact stop talking and get off this thread now
 
Here you have the original posts.

Also as an aside, it's a bit naive to think that Ratcliffe comments are innocent. Manchester United never left Manchester, suggesting otherwise is a typical tactic used by a certain type of politicians.

Well the original posts don’t mention nationality either. Just mentions fans based in Manchester. Which has always been a melting pot, hence the local match-going fans have always been diverse. I don’t think you need to jump from that to implicit xenophobia. And I don’t have any problem with people getting pissed off at the idea that the fact this is a Manchester based club, created by and for the people of Manchester, is no longer relevant or important.

I just don’t get why foreign fans (the category I belong to) are so sensitive about this stuff. We support a Manchester football club. The clue is in the name. So our relationship with it is different to people who are from Manchester. We really need to accept this.
 
Do people actually stand with this sort of thing and have any logic or basis?

The club is based in Manchester. The stadium is in Manchester. The training ground is in Greater Manchester. The players live in the surrounding Greater Manchester area and any investment or significant change to any of these things will primarily affect the people who live in and near Manchester more than any of the rest of us. Football isn’t like American sporting franchises where picking the club up and moving it somewhere is no biggie. It’s embedded in the culture of the area… literally.

Furthermore regular match going fans (who may not exclusively be from Manchester, incidentally) who travel not just to OT every other weekend, but across the country ever other, to European and domestic cup comps in the week, and basically organise their entire life around physically following the club and supporting the players in person, are the life blood of the team, and football in general, and absolutely the most important fans.

It’s not some kind of weird inverse Daily Mail strawman where everyone in Manchester just plops out and is given a free seat at OT that some far more deserving foreigner would kill for! The idea local matchgoers are simply “lucky” be be born near, rather than it being part of their cultural heritage is such a weird, myopic way of looking at it.

I am none of these things btw (I’m I Londoner who goes to a decent but declining amount of games) but I think you’ve gotta be pretty insecure about your support to argue it’s not the case. No, we aren’t as important. It’s not your fault you live half the world away, but tough. You don’t get to play for Brazil either or be James Bond. Who cares? I’ve genuinely no idea why people are so weird about it!

It’s interesting that people can watch things like Welcome to Wrexham and see and even champion how important the football club is for the local community and then conclude that Manchester United is now so big that it need no longer apply AT ALL… Should all Mancunians support City then? Or just not have a club at all? It does genuinely feel like some online fans would rather the club lose its Manc/UK roots entirely so they’d feel better about/closer to it… which strikes me as a kind of weird form of cultural appropriation.

Non-locals can be brilliant fans, but we should surely always be respectful of the fact we support a club in Manchester:.. and those who aren’t (and there are loads online) are far more disrespectful than British fans who’re a bit sniffy at them IMO

The few thousands of away match going fans are important for the team but they are no more important than the +60k that goes to home games who are themselves no more important than the millions that watch every games on TV. And the reason is that they all fill different crucial needs, in terms of support, money and notoriety for the club.

Nah this is wishy washy bullshit.
 
Not at all. It’s just saying the most important fans are the ones in the locality of the club. And that is a sentiment that is blindingly obvious.

What is the intent behind this " international fans flying in just for a ding dong "?

I didn't make anything of it in the original thread because I don't care enough, but lets not be silly, you know exactly what he was doing.
 
What is the intent behind this " international fans flying in just for a ding dong "?

I didn't make anything of it in the original thread because I don't care enough, but lets not be silly, you know exactly what he was doing.


I genuinely think the point he was making is the people who fought for the club and got involved in a “ding dong” and literally stopped a premier league game from happening were the locals who were furious over the way the club was treated. The point being the actual fans at games, boots on the ground are involved in the “ding dongs”. That is slang for fighting by the way.
 
Nah this is wishy washy bullshit.

Which part is whichy whashy?

In order to be as big and successful as it is Manchester United needs money and local support. Money is mainly down to international viewers and people that don't go to the stadium, local support is from locals.
 
I genuinely think the point he was making is the people who fought for the club and got involved in a “ding dong” and literally stopped a premier league game from happening were the locals who were furious over the way the club was treated. The point being the actual fans at games, boots on the ground are involved in the “ding dongs”. That is slang for fighting by the way.

Fair enough.
 
Ofcourse stadium going fans are more important, they are the one who creates atmosphere during the games.

Other fans are important too, the global reach is one of the reason for bigger tv deal and sponsorship deals but If there should be an order then it's local fans first.

Local doesn’t mean stadium going, and non -Manchester often does. So I think the question about being from Manchester should be answered with different rationale.
 
Which part is whichy whashy?

In order to be as big and successful as it is Manchester United needs money and local support. Money is mainly down to international viewers and people that don't go to the stadium, local support is from locals.

There is a post on the first page that says match day income is worth around 30% of all commercial income. So those 80,000 there on matchday certainly contribute more per person by a huge margin.
 
I am disappointed in this forum. The stance this forum takes on other matters is a breath of fresh air. I have always seen members come out in protest against elitism and xenophobia but I think in this particular matter, we are having a brain fart. I never thought I will read so many opinions on a single thread with which I disagree wholeheartedly.

No fan is more important than others. Period.

You are not more important purely because you live in close proximity to a global football club. You are not more special because you choose to spend on match tickets. You are in no position to lock others out of the “special fan” status because United is established in Manchester.

It is the same as protectionism. It is the same as saying that despite globalism, my people are more important so should get special status for jobs. My businesses are more important so should be getting subsidies. No one is allowed to compete with them because some time ago, our markets were closed and then it only belonged to us.
 
Which part is whichy whashy?

In order to be as big and successful as it is Manchester United needs money and local support. Money is mainly down to international viewers and people that don't go to the stadium, local support is from locals.

Collectively, but not individually.

Anyone with a season ticket is putting more into United's bank account than someone who subscribes to the TV channels we are shown on. Then many with season tickets will also subscribe anyway so they can watch away games, plus other football matches in general as they're big fans of the sport.
 
There is a post on the first page that says match day income is worth around 30% of all commercial income. So those 80,000 there on matchday certainly contribute more per person by a huge margin.

If you want to go with a per person hierarchy of fans, go ahead. I won't though.