I made no point of "ridiculing" anyone, just thought a lot of the complaints about the writing in RoP were exaggerated. It just so happens I just finished watching the dragons one, and the same issues that people had highlighted for the hobbits one are pretty much the same (characters acting irrationally, nonsense decisions, etc.) - or for example, for all the shit given to the character of Galadriel, were there as many complaints towards... well pretty much every character in HotD, apart from Viserys (who is actually a consistently well written character)? This was not a rhetorical question I asked in the other thread, it was genuine curiosity, as I was pretty excited to start watching it considering what I perceived as an overall very positive reaction, and then just had to get through, what was it? 8 or 10 episodes of the same type of show as RoP (set in lore I enjoy less)
I have a preferrence for the Rings of Power because I think I like its naivety, mostly highlighted by the simplicity of the Elrond/Durin relationship, and the (sometimes annoying, I'll agree) passages with the harfoots. I feel it doesn't have any higher aspirations than being a good looking epic fantasy show, whereas I felt that the dragons thought of itself as this clever political intrigue driven thing, which it really wasn't. But overall, I think in the grand scheme of things, they're both meh shows, that might get better in future seasons.