Edgar Allan Pillow
Ero-Sennin
Monday, right?@Enigma_87 @P-Nut0712 Did you still want to try to run your game today? Had to sort out P-NUt's formation
I don't know what happened to @Edgar Allan Pillow and I remember enigma mentioned 1-2 GMT
Monday, right?@Enigma_87 @P-Nut0712 Did you still want to try to run your game today? Had to sort out P-NUt's formation
I don't know what happened to @Edgar Allan Pillow and I remember enigma mentioned 1-2 GMT
Monday, right?
The game is scheduled for tomorrow mate, just send it in advance so we can have earlier kick off if possible.@Enigma_87 @P-Nut0712 Did you still want to try to run your game today? Had to sort out P-NUt's formation
I don't know what happened to @Edgar Allan Pillow and I remember enigma mentioned 1-2 GMT
The game is scheduled for tomorrow mate, just send it in advance so we can have earlier kick off if possible.
yeah that's fine as well. @Edgar Allan Pillow @oneniltothearsenalMines in so start whenever is best for you mate. Can get it going after the CRO-DEN game if you wanted?
A general question as to how to approach older "attacking" full-backs like Nilton Santos and Marzolini. Who do we think is definitely the first wing owning full-back to the play the game? I suspect it may be Facchetti. Whoever it is are there any journalists who reported on e.g. Facchetti and someone like Marzolini at club level? If they exist this may give us a better idea of what the journalist meant by attacking. I suspect the answer to my question is no but for those inclined, it may be worth investigating
Hey @Pat_Mustard, I've managed to get everything ready ahead of schedule if you wanted to start today?
Ended up spending a lot more time hanging around airports than originally planned - this definitely helps break the time up! Just about to take off now but could be ready in a couple of hours.
Personally, Tommy Gemmell of Celtic was one of the earliest examples of a full back consistently supporting the attack that I encountered when watching old matches, so attacking full backs in something approaching the modern sense seem to have been around since the mid-late 60s at least.
Sorry mate, I've got absolutely feck all done yet, and won't have time to get anything ready for today.
"All four titles of ours are team triumphs," he said. "In 1954, Hungary's Ferenc Puskas was the best offensive player in the world, yet we won. In 1974, Johan Cryuff was the best, but his Dutch team lost to us in the final.
"Last year, Messi's Argentina lost to us. In 1990, Maradona entered the tournament as the world's best player, but we defeated his team in the final.
Was looking for quotes on Cha Bum Kun and came across a pretty good interview from Matthaus not so long ago. One thing he mentioned really fascinated me - I'd never considered it in its totality.
http://www.espn.com/soccer/german-b...us-on-germanys-special-relationship-with-asia
In things like this it's not that difficult to judge talent, chemistry, tactical fit, but it is easy to overlook that mental aspect. It's kind of incredible that they faced up against the best player in the world, and arguably the best player of their generation, in each of these World Cup finals and kept them all remarkably quiet.
Was looking for quotes on Cha Bum Kun and came across a pretty good interview from Matthaus not so long ago. One thing he mentioned really fascinated me - I'd never considered it in its totality.
http://www.espn.com/soccer/german-b...us-on-germanys-special-relationship-with-asia
In things like this it's not that difficult to judge talent, chemistry, tactical fit, but it is easy to overlook that mental aspect. It's kind of incredible that they faced up against the best player in the world, and arguably the best player of their generation, in each of these World Cup finals and kept them all remarkably quiet.
Lots of nonsense there imo.
Only valid claim would be 1954.
Beckenbauer and Gerd Muller both were on top form in 1974 plus they had the genius of Breitner, Vogts, Overath etc. Holland had the flamboyance, but German team was individually as good, if not better. It's curious that they don't get recognized in Top WC sides discussions that often.
1990 was nowhere close to Maradona's year. In fact Matthaus and Brehme finished were in Top 3 Balon d'Or winners.
2014 - Messi might have been better, but Neuer was 3rd, Muller was 5th Lahm was 6th and Kroos was 9th in Balon d'Or. Again German team had more individual quality than any other team.
Not once does it say they didn't have good players though. Just stating that they beat the best player in the world each time. The fact would still be true if they beat Lithuania with Messi up front in the 2014 WC
Lots of nonsense there imo.
Only valid claim would be 1954.
Beckenbauer and Gerd Muller both were on top form in 1974 plus they had the genius of Breitner, Vogts, Overath etc. Holland had the flamboyance, but German team was individually as good, if not better. It's curious that they don't get recognized in Top WC sides discussions that often.
1990 was nowhere close to Maradona's year. In fact Matthaus and Brehme finished were in Top 3 Balon d'Or winners.
2014 - Messi might have been better, but Neuer was 3rd, Muller was 5th Lahm was 6th and Kroos was 9th in Balon d'Or. Again German team had more individual quality than any other team.
I don't see any other way of settling the draft games though, it just a different game than real football. Football is unpredictable game and any team with any great can lose but statistically you would always assume the greats to deliver more than 6 times, if the same game is played 10 times and that's what I consider before voting. I mean Burnley can and did beat our various great teams from Fergie era but if those two teams are in drafts I would always vote for Man United team which is better on paper. I also don't think you can consider Maradona & Cruyff being kept quiet when they lead their teams to Finals and only got beaten by almost equally stacked teams on the other side. Cruyff particularly was on fire that tournament, a far cry from Messi/Cristiano performance in the recent world cups.I'd rate that German team in 1972 as possibly among my top 3 international teams of all-time, so I don't disagree with the basic premise that Germany have always had talent. But neither he nor I were suggesting otherwise. The vast majority would agree that they were the best players in the world at that point in time. It's a bit of a no-brainer for Puskas and Cruyff and the consensus for Messi. The only debatable one is Maradona who certainly wasn't at the peak of his powers, but was just coming off the back of his 2nd title with Napoli at the time - their last ever title. And they kept them quiet each time on the biggest stage. I'm not sure why you'd dismiss such a feat given it's a constant assumption on here that the greats would make the difference in almost any game of substance.
I don't see any other way of settling the draft games though, it just a different game than real football. Football is unpredictable game and any team with any great can lose but statistically you would always assume the greats to deliver more than 6 times, if the same game is played 10 times and that's what I consider before voting. I mean Burnley can and did beat our various great teams from Fergie era but if those two teams are in drafts I would always vote for Man United team which is better on paper. I also don't think you can consider Maradona & Cruyff being kept quiet when they lead their teams to Finals and only got beaten by almost equally stacked teams on the other side. Cruyff particularly was on fire that tournament, a far cry from Messi/Cristiano performance in the recent world cups.
Yeah amazing performance from him.
Personally I think the evidence is stacked against the notion that an elite player succeeds 6 times out of 10 against an elite team. There aren't many examples of Germany vs. Holland '74, but I think they are indicative of the level of performance you could expect from an elite player against an elite marker. Likewise with Charlton against Beckenbauer in '66, Maradona against Matthaus in '90, Romario against Baresi in '94, etc. Even the very best players struggled to make an impact against the greatest teams. Brazil in 1970 or Benfica against Real in 1962 is considered the norm, when for example in the case of Benfica, they played another 3 European Cup finals and Eusébio scored just one goal. In a great team you might have one or two players on top of their game, really driving the team forward, and then another half a dozen just keeping it together - yet the way they're discussed here, almost all star attackers are giving the opposition defence hell and 1v1 it's no contest.
I don't think there's an exact science to it and I've no interest in changing how this thing generally works, but I do think it's not a very good representation of elite players vs. elite players. They generally cancel each other out.
It is very rare that a good defensive unit is given due credit in these drafts. If you have a great attack vs. a great defense the expectation is that the attack will always come out on top. I can see the logic in it as well. People love attacking players. They bring out the flair and joy in football so it is natural for them to be given preference.
I think it's the other way. In a single knock out match, having a single superstar can make a difference, but in a series of 10 matches, without a team effort, the superstar antics would be vain. You can park a bus for 80 mins and still can expect a moment of brilliance, but that's it.Football is unpredictable game and any team with any great can lose but statistically you would always assume the greats to deliver more than 6 times, if the same game is played 10 times and that's what I consider before voting.
SourceUPI said:"He was nicknamed 'The Ghost' for his cool and self-effacing style"
Stanley Matthews said:"The dressing room erupted. There was bedlam. All the England players were livid and totally opposed to this, myself included. Everyone was shouting at once. Eddie Hapgood, normally a respectful and devoted captain, wagged his finger at the official and told him what he could do with the Nazi salute, which involved putting it where the sun doesn't shine."
Jeff Harris said:"Hapgood's many splendid attributes included, being technically exceptional, he showed shrewd anticipation and he was elegant, polished, unruffled and calm."
Tom Whittaker said:"Hapgood was an extraordinary youngster. Confident beyond his years, some people found him insufferable at times. But it was the supreme confidence in his own ability which made him such a great player."
Bob Wall said:"He (Hapgood) played his football in a calm, authoritative way and he would analyse a game in the same quiet, clear-cut manner. Eddie set Arsenal players the highest possible example in technical skill and personal behaviour."
"Arsenal's success in the 1930s, which brought five league championships and three cup final appearances, was based on Chapman's strategy of sound defence and rapid counter-attack. Hapgood, as left full-back, played a key role in this system. Of average height and medium build, a non-smoker and teetotaller, he relied upon exceptional speed, precision in the tackle, excellent positional sense, and, despite his height, outstanding heading ability. He always strove for a high level of physical fitness, encouraged by Arsenal's advanced training methods. In the Arsenal defensive formation the full-backs provided cover for the ‘stopper’ centre-half, and in this role Hapgood shaped a new style of full-back play which contrasted with the crude physical methods employed by many full-backs of his day. His technique was to manoeuvre his opponent away from dangerous positions, dispossess with a well-timed tackle or interception, and set up an attack with a shrewdly placed, often short, pass. He rarely used the shoulder charge. His method was acknowledged by his most redoubtable opponent, the Stoke City and England right-winger Stanley Matthews, whose threat Hapgood contained more effectively than most: '[Hapgood] could give and take a pass; a classic player, one of the first footballing full-backs' (Miller, 35). His method became the benchmark by which future generations of full-backs set their standard."
Oxford Biography
SourceAlf Ramsey said:"My captain, my leader, my right-hand man. He was the spirit and the heartbeat of the team. A cool, calculating footballer I could trust with my life. He was the supreme professional, the best I ever worked with. Without him England would never have won the World Cup.”
Jock Stein said:“There should be a law against him. He knows what’s happening 20 minutes before everyone else.”
Paul Pogba said:"My duo with Kante? It's so easy to play with 'NG'. He is everywhere. He must have 15 lungs."
SourceClaudio Ranieri said:"This player Kante, he was running so hard that I thought he must have a pack full of batteries hidden in his shorts. He never stopped running in training. I tell him: 'One day, I’m going to see you cross the ball, and then finish the cross with a header yourself.' He’s unbelievable."
Mario Rigamonti said:“He alone is half the squad. The other half is made by the rest of us together.”
SourceEnzo Bearzot said:“He was a player who could carry the whole team and was the greatest Italian player of all time.”
SourceThesefootballtimes said:"If not for the events of May 4, 1949, the name Valentino Mazzola would probably be placed amongst the very best players of all time. On that day, the members of Il Grande Torino, the first super-team to emerge after the events of World War Two, were almost all killed on a hillside near Torino – at the Superga Basilica – in an air disaster that claimed the lives of nearly all the starters of not only Torino, but the Azzurri, the Italian national team. It’s a date that lives in infamy for followers of calcio.
Torino played greedy football, as if the ball belonged to them; in their minds if the other team had the ball it must’ve be a mistake, they didn’t deserve it, and they pressed aggressively to win it back. Once the ball was back in the hands of Torino it was being pushed up the field to one of flanks through the star of the side and pin-up boy of calcio, Valentino Mazzola. The Italy hero always knew what to do with the ball, whether it was a pinpoint pass to a charging centre-forward or a blistering shot on goal, Valentino made the decisions. He rarely made mistakes."
SourceForza Italia said:"Due to his outstanding performances in his three years at Venezia, interest in taking the quick, skilful attacking midfielder to a bigger club was high and so it was that, in 1942, Torino president Ferrucio Novo spent the handsome sum of 1.2 million lire on bringing Mazzola to the Granata where he was to become an icon and, undoubtedly, the greatest player that has ever pulled on the claret jersey. Not only that but Mazzola could also be considered to be one of the most complete football players of all time.
Rarely has a player combined such finesse, determination, spirit and magnificent footballing ability to the effect that the Torino captain did. He possessed a terrific ability to beat an opponent with his quick feet and pace as well as excellent aerial ability and an accurate, powerful strike with both feet."
Antonio Simoes said:"His eyes alone talked to you. Both on the pitch and off it, Coluna was an example for the others. He was like a father at the head of the table. He didn’t even have to speak for everyone to understand how they should behave.”
SourceLuís Filipe Vieira said:“Mario Coluna won not only the appreciation of all who had the privilege of seeing him play, but also the respect of those who, not having seen him, heard him lauded as one of the greatest talents of his generation. He was and will always be a football genius who magnified football and took Benfica to a global dimension. He will forever be in our hearts"
The Independent said:"Coluna was always an exceptional all-round athlete, becoming the national high-jump champion at the age of 17 and excelling also at boxing, basketball, running and long jump; but it was as a footballer that he shone the brightest
Though he struggled at first to adapt to big-city life, the intelligent, industrious newcomer made an immediate impact on the pitch, his perceptive passing and endless stamina augmented by an explosive left-foot shot. He was called up rapidly to the senior team by the new Brazilian coach Otto Gloria, netting twice on debut in the 5-0 drubbing of Vitoria Setubal and collecting his first title medal in his introductory campaign.
Initially he was employed at centre-forward, then as an attacking inside-left alongside spearhead Jose Aguas. But soon he dropped deep into midfield where he influenced every aspect of the game so successfully that he was described as "The Portuguese Didi", after the famous Brazilian play-maker." Source
SourceLothar Matthaus said:"I played the 1980 UEFA Cup final for Borussia Monchengladbach against Eintracht Frankfurt, who had the legendary South Korean Cha Bum-kun as their forward. He was the face of Frankfurt then. He had pace, great technique, was a great dribbler and scored goals. And most importantly, he was the ultimate team man."
Alex Ferguson said:"The problem we couldn't solve was Tscha Bum. We could not stop him. He was unstoppable."
Gunter Netzer said:"Cha would have been a starting forward for any club in the world. Asia has yet to produce another player of Cha's caliber."
Vitorio Pozzo said:"To have him in your team meant to start 1-0 up."
Luigi Veronelli said:"I also saw Pele playing. He did not achieve Meazza's elegant style of playing. One day, I witnessed him doing something astonishing. He stopped the ball with a bicycle kick, elevating himself two meters from the ground. Then he landed with the ball glued at his foot, dribbled over an astonished defender, and then went on to score a goal with one of his hallmark shots, sardonic and accurate to the millimeter."
Peppe Prisco said:"Meazza was great, unbeatable, even if he would occasionally run into a frightful crisis, caused by his intense sexual activity and his passion for the game. When he took over on the field, he did things that left the mouth ajar."
Giuseppe Meazza said:"I'm not selfish on the field. I like that my team-mates score goals too, to the point I even get rebuked: 'You were supposed to shoot!' There is nothing worse than individualism."
SourceESPN said:"The following season, he netted 24 goals for his club and continued to deliver at international level. He hit a first-half hat-trick to help Italy to a 5-0 win over France in January 1931, and the following month, playing against Hugo Meisl's Austrian Wunderteam, he scored what he would later describe as the finest goal of his career. Picking up the ball on the halfway line, he had embarked on a solo run into the penalty area. Pausing in front of goalkeeper Rodolphe Hiden, he drew him off his line - "like the bullfighter calls the beast," as the great journalist Gianni Brera put it - before evading a challenge, flicking the ball from right foot to left and placing it into the empty net. The goal helped Italy to their first ever victory over Austria."
SourceThe Times said:"His dash, intelligence and rapid and powerful shooting, coupled with his peculiar capacity for enticing the goalkeeper out of his goal, have won for him many admirers, who declare that he is unrivalled."
SourceESPN said:"It wasn't just his scoring talent that made him such a fantastic footballer, he also possessed skills on the ball that would even have Lionel Messi mesmorized. He was a complete footballer who used his passion for dancing the tango to assist him on the pitch with his trademark twists and turns. Though not the tallest player, he was excellent in the air, had a truly inspiring vision for the game across the field of play, and by playing with both feet, he was a brilliant passer of the ball. All these skills meant he could not only score countless goals, but he also provided many for his teammates too."
SourceArsene Wenger said:"Weah was a real surprise. For me it was like a child discovering a chocolate bunny in his garden at Easter. I have never seen any player explode on to the scene like he did."
SourceArsene Wenger said:"But it’s down to the fact that one thing that was common in George’s attitude [is being] strong mentally, absolutely unbelievably convinced that he has a mission."
Right ! as it should be. There is no way in drafts I think to accommodate for form, luck, external motivation etc which matters a lot in real football. I think the closest we got was with FM draft which has some randomizations thrown in.True that Greece 2004 would never win a Euro on Redcafe
Yeah thats not the point I was making, in the example Ecstatic mentioned if played 10 times I would expect Portugal to win 6-7 times at least in Euro 2004 final. Mostly because they had a better team on paper.I think it's the other way. In a single knock out match, having a single superstar can make a difference, but in a series of 10 matches, without a team effort, the superstar antics would be vain. You can park a bus for 80 mins and still can expect a moment of brilliance, but that's it.
I'd say Maradona and Baggio are closest exceptions to the rule.
Pm me your thoughts in a few words. I'll set it up.Stuck working overtime right now, so probably won’t get anything together in the near future. If someone’s able to throw a formation together for me, we can at least have something to to get the match started so no one is waiting for me
Stuck working overtime right now, so probably won’t get anything together in the near future. If someone’s able to throw a formation together for me, we can at least have something to to get the match started so no one is waiting for me
Sure - haven't done my own write-up yet, but can throw something together later tonight if that sounds like a plan.Hey sorry, been terribly caught up with work. I can possibly knock something out by today or tomorrow latest if that is fine.
We can wait, no problems
Sent to @Edgar Allan PillowSure - haven't done my own write-up yet, but can throw something together later tonight if that sounds like a plan.