The Impossible Draft R1 - Skizzo vs Sjor/Jim Beam

With players at career peak, who will win this game?


  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
Think its the other way round.

Yeah. you are right. I got it backwards!

RIVER.jpg
 
I also rate Corbatta ahead of Rats.
I'm glad to see Rats picked but he's a hard one to rate. Firstly it's even difficult to tell his best position — it would probably be a left midfielder, although obviously he also played as a left back a lot (but the starting left back for Dynamo and USSR was usually Demyanenko). One of Lobanovskyi's ridiculous all-rounders. Reminded me of Alba-Mathieu partnership at Valencia (albeit at a higher level, of course) — two players who were equally good at either wing position and interchanged quite a lot.
 
Sjor's midfield won my vote here — and the Stoichkov-Elkjær partnership is also awesome (and well balanced with Corbatta on the right as a more orthodox winger). I like Skizzo's defence a bit better, but Charlton/Schuster/Stoichkov/Elkjær :drool:
 
just a quick reply before the game, no doubt Rattin was quality but thats why i saw when i watched him...in other segments he was pretty damn good, very classy on the ball. Reckon you could get away with it alongside Vidal as he was an absolute beast at his peak but he is here against Sir Bobby of all people + all 3 from the front line are very good dribblers but are also rapid as feck. Could be a problem on the counter.
The obvious question is: how did Rattin get on against Charlton in 1966?
 
The obvious question is: how did Rattin get on against Charlton in 1966?

Rattin got sent of in the first half for "insulting" the ref, they faced each other in 62' as well and Charlton ran the show.
 
Rattin got sent of in the first half for "insulting" the ref, they faced each other in 62' as well and Charlton ran the show.
To be fair Charlton played as an outside left in 1962 and didn't face him directly, did he?
 
Don’t know much about Vasyl Rats but his wiki profile says he was a midfielder. Did he ever play left back?
 
To be fair Charlton played as an outside left in 1962 and didn't face him directly, did he?

i watched the game a year ago so cant recall where specifically he played, it might be a bit further on the left then usual but he never hugged the line and was often in the middle in that inside left channel that he likes.
But its not just their face to face duel that happened, what i saw from Rattin defensive wise there is no way he can deal with a midfielder that will ran at him whole day long.
 
But its not just their face to face duel that happened, what i saw from Rattin defensive wise there is no way he can deal with a midfielder that will ran at him whole day long.
Yeah, I don't argue with that — it was one of the reasons behind my vote.
 
Don’t know much about Vasyl Rats but his wiki profile says he was a midfielder. Did he ever play left back?
He did. He played more as a left midfielder but he was pretty versatile — and when Demyanenko moved to the right or was injured or for whatever tactical reason didn't play as a left back Rats usually played as a Dynamo/USSR left back. Started 1988 Euro final as one iirc (and scored the winner in the group game against Netherlands as a LM).
 
Don’t know much about Vasyl Rats but his wiki profile says he was a midfielder. Did he ever play left back?

great, so its not only Sammer on the left that doesnt play in his best position its the leftback as well :D
When we lose im hoping we played with 10 man as Corbatta got to drunk and he missed the stadium.
 
Don’t know much about Vasyl Rats but his wiki profile says he was a midfielder. Did he ever play left back?

UEFA 88 final

300px-URS-NED_1988-06-25.svg.png


He’d often find himself between a left back or a left midfielder though, and i had plans for him to take up the mantle of a left wing back of sorts before my drafting oversight :D he was one of the all round Soviet types from that era though who could slot into a number of positions, so I don’t see him being out of position here.
 
Cheers mate. Hard luck to you and @Jim Beam

Wasn’t looking forward to the prospect of facing Stoichkov and elkjaer, and even less so Sir Bobby and Rattin :nervous:

You know you can always count on Arsene Wenger of drafts. Two good reinforcements, Sammer in his position and you are in great spot :)
 
I'd say Rats main position was left-midfield, though as harms said he was a versatile player that switched about and covered a lot for Demyanenko and also played centre midfield quite a few times before the emergence of Mikhailichenko. I liked him a lot, he had the high workrate and versatile tactically balanced style for Lobanovsky, but also a high amount of technique and vision in his game, unlike someone like other utility man Andrei Bal or Ivan Yaremchuk on the other side of midfield who were strictly solid system men. He was a good dribbler too and though he didn't score many goals, tended to get important ones.
 
I'd say Rats main position was left-midfield, though as harms said he was a versatile player that switched about and covered a lot for Demyanenko and also played centre midfield quite a few times before the emergence of Mikhailichenko. I liked him a lot, he had the high workrate and versatile tactically balanced style for Lobanovsky, but also a high amount of technique and vision in his game, unlike someone like other utility man Andrei Bal or Ivan Yaremchuk on the other side of midfield who were strictly solid system men. He was a good dribbler too and though he didn't score many goals, tended to get important ones.

How would you see him doing as a left wing back of sorts? Slightly freed up to go forward, with some defensive responsibility. That’s why I leaned towards him primarily

@harms input welcome as well.