No he should probably come off the list for some handball player.
You don't have to act like a twat. Now, if you put Bo Jackson then you can add Walter Payton, Jackie Robinson, Jim Brown or Willie Mays.
No he should probably come off the list for some handball player.
Well-known yes, but nowhere close to being comfortably better than either of them.
You don't have to act like a twat. Now, if you put Bo Jackson then you can add Walter Payton, Jackie Robinson, Jim Brown or Willie Mays.
It’s not acting like a twat it’s sarcastic humour.
Bo gets in ahead of those guys and was always a guarantee for this list thanks to him winning ESPN’s sport science greatest athlete of all time contest.
Bo was a better athlete than any of those guys though.You don't have to act like a twat. Now, if you put Bo Jackson then you can add Walter Payton, Jackie Robinson, Jim Brown or Willie Mays.
To be considered the best across all sports you first need to be the undisputed best in your own field so Jordan federer are out and second, the game must be played by a significant portion of the world. Gretzky out.
Bo was a better athlete than any of those guys though.
How are you defining “sportsman”?And they were far better sportsmen, in their field.
How are you defining “sportsman”?
There are a few things worth considering for such a list. As mentioned earlier, when making a list you have to distinguish whether you are asking about the greatest athlete or sportsman (which imo could be completely different things). Also worth considering that there are people outside the US and Europe how may be worth of being included.
In what way?Bo was a better athlete than any of those guys though.
The problem with that is that swimming requires facilities that many poor countries don't have, F1 and Golf aren't popular games in most countries, same thing with the NFL and Baseball, and for Pelé we have Maradona. So Ali vs Bolt.
This is true.A man that plays a sport. Jim Brown and Payton were better running backs, Jackie Robinson and Willie Mays better baseball players. Now, to be honest the simple fact that I use these four men as a benchmark gives more weight to your point.
Have you ever seen Bo play?In what way?
Those metrics cannot be compared between team and individual sports though. A footballer winning 5 CLs and a men's singles tennis player winning 5 grand slams cannot be compared under any metric. In which case the individual one obviously gets far more credit.You can use enough different metrics to gauge an overall #1. Legacy, peak level, distance from rivals etc etc.
To be considered the best across all sports you first need to be the undisputed best in your own field so Jordan federer are out and second, the game must be played by a significant portion of the world. Gretzky out.
Those metrics cannot be compared between team and individual sports though. A footballer winning 5 CLs and a men's singles tennis player winning 5 grand slams cannot be compared under any metric. In which case the individual one obviously gets far more credit.
Since when is Ali the undisputed best boxer ever? I don't think he should be in the discussion, unless it factors heavily their social and 'fame' impact.
In what way do I compare a guy who was surrounded with 10 other players who had a contribution to his success in varying degrees over the course of his career to someone who has achieved everything on his own?You can compare it to some degree, and arrive at a conclusion which will be based around more than just whether it was an individual or a team sport.
Ice hockey is huge in Canada and Russia, aswell as USA and several countries across Europe have professional leagues. Considering it’s popularity in the two biggest countries on earth, it has to be included.
Since when is Ali the undisputed best boxer ever? I don't think he should be in the discussion, unless it factors heavily their social and 'fame' impact.
No, it was a genuine questionHave you ever seen Bo play?
Balic is in the Maradona category. Very good at handball but not the athlete Guðjón Valur is. Hansen doesn't have the career behind him so you might as well name Neymar.In that case, I won't have any problem mentioning Daniel Narcisse, Nikola Karabatic, Thierry Omeyer, Jackson Richardson, Ivano Balic or Mikkel Hansen. But seriously Karabatic is up there with the absolute best.
Bo was 6’1” 230lbs and could run 100m in 10.5 seconds, ran the 40 yard dash at the NFL draft combine in 4.12 seconds, was an All-American and All-Pro running back, was an MLB All-Star, could hit for average and power, could cover all of right field, had an absolute cannon for an arm, and his performance in the weight room was phenomenal.No, it was a genuine question
Bo was 6’1” 230lbs and could run 100m in 10.5 seconds, ran the 40 yard dash at the NFL draft combine in 4.12 seconds, was an All-American and All-Pro running back, was an MLB All-Star, could hit for average and power, could cover all of right field, had an absolute cannon for an arm, and his performance in the weight room was phenomenal.
That’s more an urban legend than anything.I thought he didn’t do weights?
Auburn fullback Tommie Agee said:“He’d go in the weightroom and bench press 400 pounds like he’d been doing it all his life.”
And yet neither compete in the Olympic event in which the winner is actually called “the best athlete in the world”.There’s two olympians in there that I think it’s difficult to justify picking one over the other.
Michael Phelps is the most successful Olympian of all time, and Usain Bolt was basically the face of track and field for a decade.
Such an unnecessary response.And yet neither compete in the Olympic event in which the winner is actually called “the best athlete in the world”.
Umm... It’s true.Such an unnecessary response.
That’s in addition to playing football, baseball, and basketball professionally and before modern sports science.he could run the 100-yard dash in 10 seconds flat; the 220 in 21.8 seconds; the 440 in 51.8 seconds; the 880 in 1:57, the mile in 4:35; the 120-yard high hurdles in 15 seconds; and the 220-yard low hurdles in 24 seconds.[7]He could long jump 23 ft 6 in and high-jump 6 ft 5 in.[7] He could pole vault 11 feet; put the shot47 ft 9 in; throw the javelin 163 feet; and throw the discus 136 feet
Muhammad Ali transcends sport to be honest. No one in that list can match Ali's immense legacy off the ring.
Usain Bolt is the fastest man in the world. Does that make him a better athlete than the best long-distance runner in the world? People have a very american-centric definition of athlete
And if we're considering legacy than it's Ali, it's not even debatable. He's the most famous athlete by far, his impact is on completely different level to anyone else. He's the guy the best modern athletes grew up idolizing