Dans
Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Cult of (a) personality.
I sometimes wonder that too, but I think it's just new music genuinely doesn't hold a candle to the classics of the past and nothing new that I listen to sticks or resonates with me, so I go back to the old stuff.Ive seen loads of bands this summer to packed out arenas big and small. but nearly all are from 90's early 00's
But sometimes I wonder am I just too lazy to discover new music?
I hope Dave Grohl does. Weird and annoying prick whose band makes music that is so dull, I already forget it while listening to it.
The Foo Fighters sound like an anti-supergroup, that consists of the most boring and pointless members of some great bands.Ban this guy
The Foo Fighters sound like an anti-supergroup, that consists of the most boring and pointless members of some great bands.
I sometimes wonder that too, but I think it's just new music genuinely doesn't hold a candle to the classics of the past and nothing new that I listen to sticks or resonates with me, so I go back to the old stuff.
For me the Foo Fighters are mostly a cult of personality around Dave Grohl, who portrays himself as this true and real rockstar. The music is absolutely pointless. You’d have to pay me to watch them.Fairly accurate. Never did like them and never saw the appeal. I could have won VIP tickets to see them once, it was tickets or cash, I took the cash.
For me the Foo Fighters are mostly a cult of personality around Dave Grohl, who portrays himself as this true and real rockstar. The music is absolutely pointless. You’d have to pay me to watch them.
He’s basically the same person Jared Leto is.Plus he's recently been shown up for being an absolute piece of shit.
Plus he's recently been shown up for being an absolute piece of shit.
The Foo Fighters sound like an anti-supergroup, that consists of the most boring and pointless members of some great bands.
I saw a hilarious post on reddit where someone essentially said "I don't like putting celebrities on pedestals and don't like it when people really idolise them. As an aside, Dave Grohl being revealed as a cheat has ruined my life."
Jeez. That organisation sounds terrible.Hard to believe that a group containing members of Nirvana, The Germs, Sunny Day Real Estate and No Use for a Name manage to play the blandest of bland radio-rock. It shouldn't be possible. There's some stuff across the first 3 albums that I think is decent, but they just got duller
Dave Grohl somehow successfully conned the world into thinking he's a saintly super nice guy too, and this recent affair is the first blemish on his reputation. Even though by his own admission he cheated on his first wife a bunch of times in the 90s, causing their divorce. The whole band's involvement with the AIDS denial organisation Alive and Well in the early 00's should have absolutely buried him and the Foo Fighters, but they masterfully sidestepped it by completely ignoring it, and his squeaky clean nicest-guy-ever reputation remained untarnished. Grohl is a PR mastermind, but his music post-Nirvana is mostly guff. Every time I hear a new Foo Fighters song from each passing album, I find it impossible to believe anybody actually likes them.
Both yes and no. It's sort of the samd argument. Since the music bands traditionally makes isn't really the mainstream music right now, it generally takes longer for bands to establish themselves these days. The last band to make an impact right away that I remember is Imagine Dragons, and they make very radio compatible music.His stats about bands formed in the last 10 years are pretty wild. More convincing than the stats in the OP.
Foo Fighters are my favourite live band, have seen them a bunch of times. Great energy and crowd interaction and incredibly talented musicians. The vitriol for them kind of odd tbh.
It's hard to feel vitriol for a band so boring. Don't disagree that they are all talented, the music is just so safe and they never really evolved at all. If someone put them on, I probably wouldn't complain, but I'd never choose to listen to them myself.
Yeah I agree with this. Art/post-punk/rock have had some good bands in the 10s and 20s. The ones you mention, and then stuff like Squid, Fontaines DC, Protomartyr, Crack Cloud, Iceage, Gilla Band (Girl Band), Parquet Courts. And then of course King Gizzard who don't really belong to the above but have been interesting to follow.Think most of the cool new(er) bands I see are in the punk space - think Amyl & the Sniffers, the Chats, Shame, Viagra Boys, Death Grips, I also like a few bands in the electro pop space like Confidence Man, but yeah - none of them are gonna be topping the charts.
It's a change in what's in the mainstream. There are many bands that are quite popular but they're not really selling well necessarily so they won't chart.
Agree 100%The Foo Fighters sound like an anti-supergroup, that consists of the most boring and pointless members of some great bands.
My favourite band - Fleet Foxes - is a current band but they’re neither rock or metal band but more indie folk. The War on Drugs have released some great more conventional rock albums (more springsteen like than proper hard rock) over the last decade.Bands are cool when theyre metal or rock but when they're singing pop love songs their not cool their pathetic and if you like bands like westlife and backstreet boys you shoul dbe ashamed and listen to the real music like motzart and kenny g
Grohl wasn’t pointless. He was a tramendous drummer and an important cog in giving a three man band a big sound. It’s just that Kurt was a musical genius who sang, played guitar and most importantly wrote their whole (brilliant yet short lived) catalogue. In any other band, Grohl wouldn’t be considered a pointless member.The Foo Fighters sound like an anti-supergroup, that consists of the most boring and pointless members of some great bands.