The Cissé Issue...

  • Thread starter Used to be Jip Jaap
  • Start date
Another asset to Cisse is his marketability, people(like us) want to watch these players. Anyway I'm sure the suits can see the potential$$$.
 
Further to his marketability, what I mean is United are better set to recoup on any 'investment' in Cisse, than our less developed competitors, who are still at the stage of building stadiums.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

40m is slightly more than 40yards so lets cut that to about 4.65 which is decent.

The average US Football Wide reciever or defensive back runs around a 4.4 or so. The fastest 40 time I've ever heard of is about 4.18 this past year.</strong><hr></blockquote>

40m = 43 3/4 yards
4,72 for 40m = 4,31 for 40 yards.
More than just decent then.
 
I highly doubt Johnsen ran the equivalent of a 4.31 40 yard dash. Randy Moss runs a 4.26 or so and you're going to tell me that Moss is only a step or two quicker than Johnsen.
 
Originally posted by Richter:
<strong>Who is the fastest soccer player?</strong><hr></blockquote>

a couple of years ago, apparently Keith Curle (ex city) was good enough to be able to run at professional standard, even with his footie boots on!
No idea who it would be nowadays.
 
I think too much emphasize is put on pace these days. A 'fast' footballer does not have to be particularly quick, as long as they can run with the ball. Not sure I'm making any sense. :confused: For instance, Giggsy is not actually that fast, but with the ball he's lightning quick compaired to other players.
 
Originally posted by Gazza:
<strong>I think too much emphasize is put on pace these days. A 'fast' footballer does not have to be particularly quick, as long as they can run with the ball. Not sure I'm making any sense. :confused: For instance, Giggsy is not actually that fast, but with the ball he's lightning quick compaired to other players.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I agree with the point about pace-with-ball as more important that raw pace - but I strongly disagree that the importance of pace is overrated! On the contrary, it becomes more and more important IMO.
 
Originally posted by Wibble:
<strong>18 million is <a href="http://football.guardian.co.uk/rumourmill/index/0,1451,717398,00.html" target="_blank">reportedly</a> what it will take. Probably worth a punt IMO. Do Liverpool have that sort of dosh to spend?</strong><hr></blockquote>

In a word, yes. :)
 
Originally posted by Richter:
<strong>Who is the fastest soccer player?</strong><hr></blockquote>

In the premiership I would guess it would be Owen or Mellberg. Gregory once said that Mellberg is faster than Owen and to be honest I have never seen anyone speed past Mellberg.
 
I honestly think that the Cisse issue can only end in (1) Cisse becoming an LFC player after the WC or (2) Cisse becoming an LFC player next year. Houllier has spent too much time on this deal to blow it now. My guess is that he has already signed for them.
 
Looks like you could be right J... Liverpool have just announced they will NOT be signing Anelka and they wouldn't do that without letting the ink dry on another deal....
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:
<strong>Looks like you could be right J... Liverpool have just announced they will NOT be signing Anelka and they wouldn't do that without letting the ink dry on another deal....</strong><hr></blockquote>

Sure they would. United shipped out Stam even before they've signed Blanc. No doubt Houllier has decided Anelka isn't right for him and have something else in mind.

But I seriously doubt it's Cisse, not now anyway.
 
Originally posted by R A Softlad:
<strong>

In a word, yes. :) </strong><hr></blockquote>

Won't matter. Cissé generates far too much hype to go on the cheap - which, surely, is what £18m would be: he's younger than RVN and he's got a clean 'injury sheet'.

Bidding starts at £20m, probably more. I doubt that Poo can match Auxerre's valuation.

If United want to be a serious contender in the "world's biggest club" competition - WITHOUT getting silly Real Madrid-style - this is an opportunity that can't be missed. He's precisely what we need...
 
Originally posted by Used to be Jip Jaap:
<strong>If United want to be a serious contender in the "world's biggest club" competition - WITHOUT getting silly Real Madrid-style - this is an opportunity that can't be missed. He's precisely what we need...</strong><hr></blockquote>

If utd want to spend 20 million on a striker they'res a lot more bargains in the offering.
Cisse is overpriced because hes young & french and the whole world has been raving about him despite very few ppl having seen him other than the occasional Eurogoals.
Trezeguet, Vieri, Shevchenko etc would all be better value for money.
Splashing 20 mill on some wonder kid is not how to show you are the worlds greatest.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>
Because buying an expensive striker is not on our list of priorities this year...</strong><hr></blockquote>

Why not? Surely, you'll agree that we need another striker for next season if we want to maintain our current level - and I think that it's a dangerous strategy to try and buy strikers on the cheap (unless of course you can find an OGS-style bargain...). Forlan can of course still prove his doubters wrong but it would be foolish to go into the new season with only Forlan, OGS and RVN. Forlan is definitely not the finished article...

If you agree that United need another striker, who'd be your preference?
 
Originally posted by Murt:
<strong>

If utd want to spend 20 million on a striker they'res a lot more bargains in the offering.
Cisse is overpriced because hes young & french and the whole world has been raving about him despite very few ppl having seen him other than the occasional Eurogoals.
Trezeguet, Vieri, Shevchenko etc would all be better value for money.
Splashing 20 mill on some wonder kid is not how to show you are the worlds greatest.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I think that either of those three would cost quite a lot more than Cissé both in transfer and wages - and I definitely consider the latter a better overall prospect. I haven't watched him in too many full games so I may be wrong - but Houllier, Lemerre, etc. are not fools...

I accept that there is an element of risk when you buy a player before he has proven himself in a big league or competition but I think United can afford to run this risk. If a better player can be found on the cheap, fine with me - but I doubt that very much.
 
Originally posted by Used to be Jip Jaap:
<strong>
I accept that there is an element of risk when you buy a player before he has proven himself in a big league or competition but I think United can afford to run this risk.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Only problem being that the risk for us grows exponentially with transfer fee. Beckham (and his role in the team) could adapt at his own pace going on or off in his first days as he cost nothing. Ole to this day is paying the price of having been cheap.

If we pay 20m for this guy we'd better be sure he will do well because we won't see OGS for the whole year as SAF will insist on having Cisse. Bit like the whole Veron story. If there is one flaw in SAF that has to be it. :(
 
Originally posted by antohan:
<strong>

Only problem being that the risk for us grows exponentially with transfer fee. Beckham (and his role in the team) could adapt at his own pace going on or off in his first days as he cost nothing. Ole to this day is paying the price of having been cheap.

If we pay 20m for this guy we'd better be sure he will do well because we won't see OGS for the whole year as SAF will insist on having Cisse. Bit like the whole Veron story. If there is one flaw in SAF that has to be it. :( </strong><hr></blockquote>

I could see OGS, RVN and Cissé being used in an about equal number of games over the season - and Forlan in quite a few games against weaker sides (if he starts scoring goals!).
To some extent, I think that it's a myth that OGS has been on the bench over the years because of his price tag. I think he raised his game just a tad last season which has proved to be enough to make him a regular first teamer - and I can see no reason why he shouldn't keep that status if Cissé arrived. United play enough games to make all of those three feel that they are regulars...
 
If Agahowa is available for less than £10 m we are stupid if we dont move for him. As far as I can tell we have no fast forward lined up, Cisse is a no-go, Ronaldo is just a bunch of agents trying to get a new deal and Kanoute or Anelka? Forget it.

Agahowa is the only guy who is there for the taking.

He could be our Owen/Henry.
 
Originally posted by ShAoLiN_ChRoNiC:
<strong>If Agahowa is available for less than £10 m we are stupid if we dont move for him. As far as I can tell we have no fast forward lined up, Cisse is a no-go, Ronaldo is just a bunch of agents trying to get a new deal and Kanoute or Anelka? Forget it.

Agahowa is the only guy who is there for the taking.

He could be our Owen/Henry.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Haven't seen him enough to rate him. But if he's in Cissé's class, buy him instead by all means!

My main concern is that African strikers aren't usually in the +20 goals per season bracket - don't know why. Of course, we've got OGS and RVN who are both very good finishers but I'd very much like the striker we buy to be a 'real' striker.

Would you say that Agahowa is a +20 goals player?
 
It's hard to say really. He is still young, younger than Forlan. I think he would do as good as Anelka has done at Liverpool if not better in his first season with limited appearances etc.

Some football pundits say he will be better than Cisse and that he is going to be the best striker in the world. They rate him as the number one prospect.

It may take him awhile to settle, but I have no doubt he could settle in and score more than Forlan has. He plays a different style meaning those wam-bam shots from Forlan may instead be well placed finishes.

I'm afraid that Ferge has already chosen his fast forward and that is Forlan. He should use him properly and push him forward not keep pulling him back. Decide if he is resuming his winger career or his striking career.

If we dont get a new player, I now think Forlan can do it if Fergie pushes him up onto the defenders shoulders. He has enough pace and explosion to do ok in the box. Need to get him IN the box to score, not outside it to set up RVN.
 
personaly I think Forlan don't have that "cutting edge" to be a ghost in the opponent penalty box ... He's probably ... mmm . how should I put it .. a bit "too nice" !! He won't bull-doze into the area and stick his foot out to poke in unpredictable goals ... his physical probably play a part in this ... he's fast but not very "atheletic" ...
Coley has that in him ... that's why you see him popping up here and there scoring odd goals .. .I thnk for the last 2 season or so when we draw 1-1 with Arsenal, Coley is ALWAYS the one ( not talking abt the 6-1 roasting at OT ) .. .
Of course I understand it takes time to adapt to the team before one can do this task ... When Coley first join us he wasn't anything like what I have praised him for ... He probably took &gt;2 seasons before started to make a huge impresssion ... In Forlan I don have a good feel on how long he might need to take ... But in Agohowa I have a good feel - somehow he give me that feeling of a "cheetah" ... fierce and poarching !! ...

And by the way, we have to realise that we can't possibly having 4 top-class strikers in our rank ... None of them will be happy then sitting on the bench when they like to play instead ... IMO it should be 3+1+1 ... ie. 3 matured strikers, 1 promising, up&coming + one youngster waiting in the wing for any urgent coverage ... For me it's (RVN & Ole & ?? ) + Forlan + Davies now ... The ?? will be our new No.9 !! <img src="graemlins/devil.gif" border="0" alt="[Devil]" />
 
Originally posted by Penny:
<strong>personaly I think Forlan don't have that "cutting edge" to be a ghost in the opponent penalty box ... He's probably ... mmm . how should I put it .. a bit "too nice" !! He won't bull-doze into the area and stick his foot out to poke in unpredictable goals ... his physical probably play a part in this ... he's fast but not very "atheletic" ...
Coley has that in him ... that's why you see him popping up here and there scoring odd goals .. .I thnk for the last 2 season or so when we draw 1-1 with Arsenal, Coley is ALWAYS the one ( not talking abt the 6-1 roasting at OT ) .. .
Of course I understand it takes time to adapt to the team before one can do this task ... When Coley first join us he wasn't anything like what I have praised him for ... He probably took &gt;2 seasons before started to make a huge impresssion ... </strong><hr></blockquote>

We have goal-poachers in Ruud and Ole. What Forlan offers is a totally different dimension to our play, and creates many chances. Once he gets one or two goals to set him off, he'll get at least 15 goals a season, I can guarantee that. He is only 23, and sometimes people forget that. He can learn skills of van Nistelrooy and Solskjaer in the future, and if PDC comes he will be the expert mentor for young Forlan.
 
Unless the PLC lose the plot I can't see us having the dosh to buy a 20 million plus stiker this summer. Cisse is a possibility for next summer if he stay put and a deal hasn't already been done.

Yorke out and Di Cannio in is all the tinkering up front I think we should do this summer.

The defense is where the problem is.
 
Originally posted by MrMarcello:
<strong>I highly doubt Johnsen ran the equivalent of a 4.31 40 yard dash. Randy Moss runs a 4.26 or so and you're going to tell me that Moss is only a step or two quicker than Johnsen.</strong><hr></blockquote>

If fortyseven's math is correct, then yes.... These are official times.

However, Johnsen's time is from some years back....
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>I doubt that there are any footballers who can break a 4.35/40.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Id fortyseven's math is correct, Lasse Olsen of Stromsgodset in Norway runs 40yards in 4.2422856.......

Don's shoot the messenger......
 
the only place people talk about cisse is on redcafe. he ain't coming to OT. mainly because he's not good enough, and is way overrated. some people have compared him with henry. he's not half the player henry is.


btw, roberto carlos claims to run the 100m in 10.3 seconds.
 
Originally posted by Floyd:
<strong>

Id fortyseven's math is correct, Lasse Olsen of Stromsgodset in Norway runs 40yards in 4.2422856.......

Don's shoot the messenger......</strong><hr></blockquote>

Surely he's the fastest person in Norway. Is he an Olmpyian then ? ;)
 
Originally posted by mancred:
<strong>the only place people talk about cisse is on redcafe. he ain't coming to OT. mainly because he's not good enough, and is way overrated. some people have compared him with henry. he's not half the player henry is.


btw, roberto carlos claims to run the 100m in 10.3 seconds.</strong><hr></blockquote>


er..you can't compare Cisse to Henry.. Henry's more experienced and has played at the top level... TBH i didn't rate Henry that highly when he was Cisse's age..but he's matured into an excellent player.....


Cisse has the potential to become a great player....
 
Originally posted by Floyd:
<strong>

If fortyseven's math is correct, then yes.... These are official times.

However, Johnsen's time is from some years back....</strong><hr></blockquote>

Again, it wouldn't be impossible for the odd footballer to run that fast - but not Ronny Johnsen. Anything below 4.3 would be world class sprinter speed. There are only about a dozen or so US footballers (many of which are also trained sprinters) who can run a sub 4.3
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>Raoul

Will you cry if we sign Cisse?
;) </strong><hr></blockquote>

No. I will stop promclaiming what a good player he is though.. ;)
 
Originally posted by Davo:
<strong>

Do you reckon we will get him?</strong><hr></blockquote>

Not this year, as he's said all along that he wants another year in France before moving abroad. You'll likely have to outbid several other big clubs next summer.