Books The BOOK thread

I'm almost finished with The Girl On The Train. This is such a brilliant and captivating book. I doubt I've read so many pages in so few days with any other book as I have with this. Love it. Will watch the movie once I'm done.

I really enjoyed it as well. Check out "Die of shame" by Mark Billingham if you like that sort of book, it's a similar mystery/thriller set in London.
 
I beg your pardon - "The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed" is one of the f*cking best first sentences of a book ever.
Well I did write that I couldn't think of a single line of memorable prose. :D
 
Yeah, in truth, my original point is wrong.
 
Thinking%2C_Fast_and_Slow.jpg

If you are interested in the human mind.
If you like travel writing, here are some of my favourites:

William Dalrymple - From the Holy Mountain. Account of a trip the author did from Mt. Athos in Greece to Egypt in the early 90s, the theme being the crisis facing Middle Eastern Christians. Also check out his In Xanadu and The Age of Kali.

Paul Theroux - The Great Railway Bazaar. Classic book on the author's journey by train from London to Japan and back. Theroux has a particular grumpy/cynical outlook on life that doesn't sit well with everyone. Personally I prefer it to the kind of 'wow it was so amazing' stuff that you get from some others. Also check out his Dark Star Safari and others.

Wilfred Thesiger - Arabian Sands. Outright travel classic, Thesiger was the last of the great British desert explorers, and had the instinct of an anthropologist. This work, and his other book The Marsh Arabs capture traditional rural Arab life just before it was changed forever by the impact of oil revenues.

Eric Newby - A Short Walk in the Hindukush. Newby probably has the best sense of humour of those I've listed here, this is a great account of his attempt to climb a remote mountain in eastern Afghanistan. Also check his Slowly Down the Ganges.

Jason Elliot - An Unexpected Light. Account of a year the author spent in Afghanistan in the mid-90s, after the rise of the Taliban, but just before they conquered Kabul.

Rory Stewart - The Places In Between. Another one set in Afghanistan (Afghanistan tends to produce great travel writing for some reason), the author (a Conservative MP) walked from Herat to Kabul in the winter of 2001/2002, through the remote 'central route' of Afghanistan.

Robert Byron - The Road to Oxiana. This is considered by some to be the greatest travel book ever written. Heavy on insights on Islamic architecture, it is set primarily in Iran and Afghanistan (again) during the 1930s.

VS Naipaul - Among the Believers. The author, like Theroux above, isn't everyone's cup of tea. This is an account of his travels in Iran, Pakistan, Malaysia and Indonesia in the aftermath of the Iranian Revolution (1979).

Colin Thubron - In the Shadow of the Silk Road. The author travels from China to Israel/Palestine, retracing Marco Polo's route backwards through Central Asia.

Let me know if you're into any specific periods or subjects of history, I have lots of recommendations especially relating to the Middle East/Islamic history.
I really enjoyed it as well. Check out "Die of shame" by Mark Billingham if you like that sort of book, it's a similar mystery/thriller set in London.
Thanks for all the suggestions.
 
Well I did write that I couldn't think of a single line of memorable prose. :D

I haven't read a King book in years, but I formed a different impression. Technically a good writer, and a great storyteller, but with nothing to say.

Everything in a SK novel is predigested. Ideas, themes, characters, even dialogue, are all drawn from popular culture - tv shows, movies, other books. Nothing to surprise or disturb the reader - the novel's setting and its inhabitants are already familiar.

There's never a sense that King has thoughtfully observed the world, reached some conclusions about the human condition, and rushed to commit them to print. It's all secondhand. His source isn't life, it's other fiction.

The guy has never had an original thought.
 
I haven't read a King book in years, but I formed a different impression. Technically a good writer, and a great storyteller, but with nothing to say.

Everything in a SK novel is predigested. Ideas, themes, characters, even dialogue, are all drawn from popular culture - tv shows, movies, other books. Nothing to surprise or disturb the reader - the novel's setting and its inhabitants are already familiar.

There's never a sense that King has thoughtfully observed the world, reached some conclusions about the human condition, and rushed to commit them to print. It's all secondhand. His source isn't life, it's other fiction.

The guy has never had an original thought.
Running man
From a Buick 8
Pet cemetery
Cell
....
 
Now I got Patrick Rothfuss' Name of the Wind for christmas. I'm around 100 pages into it, which is a bit too early to judge it. Okay so far, I guess.
How are you getting on with it? Hes the king of prose.
 
How are you getting on with it? Hes the king of prose.
Well. Well well. I'm a bit torn with the Kingkiller Chronicle. I do like his writing mostly, and there are bits which I love - some scenes with Elodin made laugh out loud, and the conversations with Auri are often truly beautiful and poetic, The Little Prince-kind of beautiful. I also loved the Story of Kvothe's development throughout the university years.
But after that, I feel the storytelling is increasingly falling apart, and the reason is the Chandrian background story. For hundreds of pages they play nearly no role at all, which is where the flow of the story is in my opinion the best. Then at some point Rothfuss seems to have remembered that they exist and he somehow needs to tick off all those hints/story bits that were given in the Chronicler-Kote conversations, and having spent over one book of not furthering this plot, which is supposed to be the center of Kvothe's story, he just starts to skip forward.
Kvothe leaving the university out of the blue. His travels to Vintas - shipwreck and robbery included, Kvothe losing the hard-won protective charm he finished making mere pages ago - all crammed into half a page. Then a nice interlude at the court of the Maer, only to be ended abruptly once more, because the plot needs to be furthered and Kvothe still needs to pick up his Ninja- and superhuman lover skills!
So let's team up with a Samurai-guy and hunt down some bandits, who happen to be led by one of the super-baddies to make that plotline less random. Oh and then there was that nymph who is fabled for driving men insane over a thousand years, but of course not our Bard-mage-soon-to-be-ninja-and-superlover protagonist. It's just too much heroism and awesomeness at this point, and the handling of sexuality throughout the story has put me off from the start. For one and a half books Kvothe is a monk or ascetic, despite turning womens' heads left and right, but he is way too pure and focused to actually act on that, or something, because his one true love is unreachable for him.
But, since it was hinted from the start that Kvothe was a famous ladykiller besides an awesome mage and superninja, he had to run into the embodiment of sexuality who grants him the secret knowledge of all-conquering lovemaking skills, instead of awkwardly finding out stuff with normal girls.
Ahem. I find myself ranting.

So, to make it short: I do enjoy reading the books (I'm close to the end of vol.2 now), no matter how negative my views lined out above may come across. But I feel that the Chandrian back-story is effectively a millstone around Rothfuss' neck, forcing his hand and forcing him to take shortcuts to meet key points of that story. The other option would have been to expand the series to 4 or 5 books, but apparently he's firmly set on his three days/three books thing. Anyway, I hope he'll finish the third one soon, because I can't take another ASOIAF situation.
 
Anybody here a fan of Flannery O'Connor? I've just finished Wise Blood having only previously read The Violent Bear It Away. I thought both were fantastic, and very tempted to pick up some of her shorter stories.
 
Reading The War against Cliché (by Martin Amis). I find his nonfiction to be incredibly hit-or-miss but it's always interesting and instructive.

Amazon blurb:
Like John Updike, Martin Amis is the pre-eminent novelist-critic of his generation. The War Against Cliché is a selection of his reviews and essays over the past quarter-century. It contains pieces on Cervantes, Milton, Donne, Coleridge, Jane Austen, Dickens, Kafka, Philip Larkin, Joyce, Waugh, Lowry, Nabokov, F. R. Leavis, V. S. Pritchett, William Burroughs, Anthony Burgess, Angus Wilson, Saul Bellow, Philip Roth, Shiva and V. S. Naipaul, Kurt Vonnegut, Iris Murdoch, Norman Mailer, Gore Vidal, Don DeLillo, Elmore Leonard, Michael Crichton, Thomas Harris - and John Updike.

Other subjects include chess, nuclear weapons, masculinity, screen censorship, juvenile violence, Andy Warhol, Hillary Clinton, and Margaret Thatcher.
 
Well. Well well. I'm a bit torn with the Kingkiller Chronicle. I do like his writing mostly, and there are bits which I love - some scenes with Elodin made laugh out loud, and the conversations with Auri are often truly beautiful and poetic, The Little Prince-kind of beautiful. I also loved the Story of Kvothe's development throughout the university years.
But after that, I feel the storytelling is increasingly falling apart, and the reason is the Chandrian background story. For hundreds of pages they play nearly no role at all, which is where the flow of the story is in my opinion the best. Then at some point Rothfuss seems to have remembered that they exist and he somehow needs to tick off all those hints/story bits that were given in the Chronicler-Kote conversations, and having spent over one book of not furthering this plot, which is supposed to be the center of Kvothe's story, he just starts to skip forward.
Kvothe leaving the university out of the blue. His travels to Vintas - shipwreck and robbery included, Kvothe losing the hard-won protective charm he finished making mere pages ago - all crammed into half a page. Then a nice interlude at the court of the Maer, only to be ended abruptly once more, because the plot needs to be furthered and Kvothe still needs to pick up his Ninja- and superhuman lover skills!
So let's team up with a Samurai-guy and hunt down some bandits, who happen to be led by one of the super-baddies to make that plotline less random. Oh and then there was that nymph who is fabled for driving men insane over a thousand years, but of course not our Bard-mage-soon-to-be-ninja-and-superlover protagonist. It's just too much heroism and awesomeness at this point, and the handling of sexuality throughout the story has put me off from the start. For one and a half books Kvothe is a monk or ascetic, despite turning womens' heads left and right, but he is way too pure and focused to actually act on that, or something, because his one true love is unreachable for him.
But, since it was hinted from the start that Kvothe was a famous ladykiller besides an awesome mage and superninja, he had to run into the embodiment of sexuality who grants him the secret knowledge of all-conquering lovemaking skills, instead of awkwardly finding out stuff with normal girls.
Ahem. I find myself ranting.

So, to make it short: I do enjoy reading the books (I'm close to the end of vol.2 now), no matter how negative my views lined out above may come across. But I feel that the Chandrian back-story is effectively a millstone around Rothfuss' neck, forcing his hand and forcing him to take shortcuts to meet key points of that story. The other option would have been to expand the series to 4 or 5 books, but apparently he's firmly set on his three days/three books thing. Anyway, I hope he'll finish the third one soon, because I can't take another ASOIAF situation.
By and large I agree with you. He rightly gets praise for his writing style and his prose flow so easily. But the story seems to halt almost entirely in Wise Man's Fear, when you consider where we are at the beginning of the book and where we are at the end, its barely progressed at all.

Though I agree his self glorification becomes nauseating at times I suppose it's being told from Kvothes own perspective, so he can be forgiven.
The Denna story arc is the worst of it for me. Kvothe going out to stalk her every couple of pages isn't good reading for me.
 
Running man
From a Buick 8
Pet cemetery
Cell
....

Posts in this thread are like corpses that you drop in the deep ocean expecting never to see again. Then they rise to the surface long after you've forgotten all about them.

There's no point arguing about King's creativity, I think. There are literary critics who've come to believe he's an great writer. I always thought he was faking it.
 
Anybody here a fan of Flannery O'Connor? I've just finished Wise Blood having only previously read The Violent Bear It Away. I thought both were fantastic, and very tempted to pick up some of her shorter stories.
I've only read Wise Blood. I liked it a lot too, it read like a Coen brothers movie at times. I've heard good things about her short story collections, particularly A Good Man Is Hard to Find.
 
Finished Marquez' One Hundred Years of Solitude last week, great novel. Covers such a long span of time and has an epic feel, but in a relatively limited number of words. Moves at a frenetic pace but still manages to keep you invested in what's happening, and the characters etc. Rather funny in certain parts, too.
 
I'm aiming for 52 books this year. So far I've read:

I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
Junky by William S. Burroughs
Cat's Cradle by Kurt Vonnegut
Sculpting in Time by Andrei Tarkovsy
Giovanni's Room by James Baldwin
A Room of One's Own by Virginia Wolff
Going to Meet the Man by James Baldwin
Orson Welles: The Road to Xanadu by Simon Callow
 
Last edited:
Finished Magpie Murders by Anthony Horowitz over the weekend. Popped up in my recommendations on Amazon and had a 4 star rating on Goodreads so got it for Christmas.

The structure is interesting; a book within a book, both of which contain a whodunit mystery. Bases itself on classic whodunit stories like Poirot and Sherlock Holmes but is very upfront about it. Took a while to get going, but overall its a good read.
 
Anyone here read the Rivers of London series by Ben Aaronovitch?

I'm on the sixth and latest book in the series. Urban fantasy, sly dark humour, great characters.

Really enjoyable stuff.
 
His Bloody Project - Its the kind of book you appreciate for its authenticity but having it so steeped in reality means there's little in the way of escapism, you feel like you're genuinely reading historical documents. A triple murder in a 19th Century Scottish village is recounted through witness statements, the accused's memoir, a psychological analysis and press reporting on the trial. A little bit meh.
 
Finished Marquez' One Hundred Years of Solitude last week, great novel. Covers such a long span of time and has an epic feel, but in a relatively limited number of words. Moves at a frenetic pace but still manages to keep you invested in what's happening, and the characters etc. Rather funny in certain parts, too.

Superb book !
 
Superb book !

Read Death of a Chronicle Foretold earlier in the week which was a nice little short story as well...Marquez manages to cover so much with so little, if that makes sense.
 
We Have Always Lived in the Castle - Such a strange / unique reading experience. I hadn't read anything by Shirley Jackson before so didn't know what to expect but this book verges on the bizarre. Nonchalant in its most disturbing moments and clear to see how it influenced the likes of King and Straub. Only 177 pages, bought it on Friday finished it this lunch time.

Just noticed its being released as a film and was filmed locally. Weird.
 
We Have Always Lived in the Castle - Such a strange / unique reading experience. I hadn't read anything by Shirley Jackson before so didn't know what to expect but this book verges on the bizarre. Nonchalant in its most disturbing moments and clear to see how it influenced the likes of King and Straub. Only 177 pages, bought it on Friday finished it this lunch time.

Just noticed its being released as a film and was filmed locally. Weird.
It's a book that's seemingly artless yet is unforgettable. Me, I especially love the parts about Merricat's 'charms (the book nailed to a tree etc etc): a tiny suggestion or snapshot of American history here, perhaps, from Salem to Lizzie Borden.
 
What are people's thoughts on East of Eden?

Started it about 6 months ago. About 200 pages through. I haven't found it particularly compelling yet.
 
So I have of late been looking for shorter books to read, I've done the whole Ulysses thing and with a full time job and a young daughter I find the prospect of a big book off putting as I know anything over 200 pages is likely to be split up over multiple weeks.

So a lot of the lists online include the standard short novels that i studied in college (Animal Farm, Crying of Lot 49, Heart of Darkness) but a recurring author was Agatha Christie. I had liked the old-timey crime fiction from Magpie Murders (where Christie is mentioned a lot) so had a look to see what the best reviewed book was and bought And Then There Were None yesterday. I read about half of it last night and have to say its one of the easiest reading experiences I've had, cuts to the chase, keeps you guessing and while there is no deeper meaning or great literary merit to its mindless fun.

So what is the Caf's opinion on Christie in general, does the novelty wear off? Is she the Dan Brown of her generation? Should i feel dirty for enjoying it?
 
So I have of late been looking for shorter books to read, I've done the whole Ulysses thing
Might I suggest Joyce's "Dubliners" as a shorter Joyce experience?
So what is the Caf's opinion on Christie in general, does the novelty wear off? Is she the Dan Brown of her generation? Should i feel dirty for enjoying it?
It has its niche. Every read needn't be a soul searching epic. Sometimes you just wanna read a good story and not have to put a lot of effort into the analysis of it. Nothing wrong with that imo
 
What are people's thoughts on East of Eden?

Started it about 6 months ago. About 200 pages through. I haven't found it particularly compelling yet.

I'm a huge fan of Steinbeck, but I have to admit to being let down by Eden. I read the whole thing expecting it to eventually get better, but it never did.
 
Finished Marquez' One Hundred Years of Solitude last week, great novel. Covers such a long span of time and has an epic feel, but in a relatively limited number of words. Moves at a frenetic pace but still manages to keep you invested in what's happening, and the characters etc. Rather funny in certain parts, too.

If I had to point to one novel as my "all-time favorite," it would be this one. Marquez's talent for prose was truly awe-inspiring.
 
If I had to point to one novel as my "all-time favorite," it would be this one. Marquez's talent for prose was truly awe-inspiring.

Yeah the manner in which he's able to keep control of the story and tell it with fantastic prose that constantly moves the plot along is superb.
 
Speaking of prose masters, I'm completely in love with James Baldwin's writing. Giovanni's Room is something else, style wise. And a real gut punch emotionally.

Have you ever read Go Tell it on the Mountain? I know it's a classic and arguably his best known work, but I've had it on my book shelf for years and have never gotten around to it. I'd like the incentive of someone insisting that I read it so I can finally get started on it. :)
 
Finished Marquez' One Hundred Years of Solitude last week, great novel. Covers such a long span of time and has an epic feel, but in a relatively limited number of words. Moves at a frenetic pace but still manages to keep you invested in what's happening, and the characters etc. Rather funny in certain parts, too.
I've just started on this, and it's really good. Breezed through the first 50 pages this afternoon.
 
Quiet by Susan Cain
Absolutely loved this. As an introvert, this book helped me learn so much more about myself with little nuggets of information of how I can improve both my social situations as well as my productivity at work. It just gives you an assurance that it's normal to be someone who prefers solitude in a world that exagerrates extroversion as an ideal. Highly recommended for any introvert.