Stick
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2005
- Messages
- 6,686
- Supports
- Liverpool
I really hope you don't mean you and I specifically....
I really hope you don't mean you and I specifically....
You can't change this...?I will give you that, I can take it...
I tried, you may remember, to get a tag-line and emailed modmin requesting so, at which point a thread was started....
....and I got temporarily banned.
Now I have lots of little things by name as its the closest I can fecking get
I read 68% of it before my kindle packed in, and I really couldn't be arsed trying to get back to where I was to finish it. I have the film so I might just watch that, but I feel almost compelled to read the rest of it now.
I read Dorian Gray a while back and thought it was decent. As Steve says it is a bit long winded and drawn out at times, but on the whole I thought it was decent. But I'm a fussy bugger.
I haven't read Ernest, but I might give it a try. I just finished Mort by Terry Pratchet and thought it was okay, started out good but didn't live up to my expectations - nothing ever does
So I've decided I might go for something more low brow to see if that pleases me any, and may go for Killing Floor by Lee Child.
Has anyone read The Passage? It's pretty monsterous so I don't want to read a big chunk of it to find out it's actually shit. I read the unabridged version of The Stand and then IT. Far too long for my liking, it almost put me off reading ever again, even though on the whole they were both good, especially The Stand. Just far far too long.
You should definitely give it a try. It was fantastic and I read it in two nights, really really enjoyed it I must say.
Just read House of the Eye. Fair enough, it's "out there" but it's quite brilliant.
Bearknight have you read Gravity's Rainbow? Sounds right up your alley.
Bearknight have you read Gravity's Rainbow? Sounds right up your alley.
I've been meaning to get start Gravity's Rainbow for a while now. But I have either been told that it's a masterpiece or a pretentious piece of shit.
Up to your interpretation really, I like Pynchon. Plus I read IJ and preferred GR so I think you'd like it, Foster Wallace modeled a lot of his writing on Pynchon AFAIK.
You can't change this...?
About Jaybezia
Gender
Female
Location
★★★★★
Interests
Football, programming, music, games, sport & pretty much everything
Occupation
Accounts
Favourite Player
Ryan Giggs
Best United Moment
Treble '99
Actually since I was at Villa on 14 April 1999 you can feck off
You've probably read "The Ballad of Reading Gaol" Steve, but that was my introduction to Wilde. It's still one of my favourite poems to this day. Have you ever read any of Wilde's works for children? I remember receiving a copy of "The Happy Prince" when I was a kid and I really enjoyed it, especially if it was read out loud to me.
This sounds really bad, but I haven't done any 'real' reading in about 5/6 years now... And I'm only 24. So, I have no real experience of what I like in terms of a book, I have read quite a few famous ones, such as Game of Thrones, Lord of the rings and a few others, as well as some 'crime/mystery' books. One about human trafficing and the other about random killings, both were quite good with how they kept you guessing the whole way...
But I'm looking to get some recommendations, I am open to anything in terms of Genre except paranormal (Vampires/ Zombies etc) as I generally don't like that theme, however if there is a particuarly good one, please mention it and I can give it a try.
Are there any books which are generally considered 'NEED TO READ', I need an idiots catch up for titles of books for the last 5 years...
The Day of the Jackal any good?
Conrad is masterful and Heart of Darkness is an astounding read. Only short too.
Heart of Darkness can be read here:
http://www.gutenberg.org/catalog/world/readfile?pageno=8&fk_files=216387
The Day of the Jackal any good?
Finished Under the Dome by Stephen King last night.
Only the 2nd King book I've read (the other being the majorly underwhelming Christine, when I was about 15, which put me off King) and even though the reviews are fairly mixed, I really enjoyed it.
A huge cast of characters, most of which are well rounded. The dialogue gets a bit sloppy now and then, but for a book of such girth that can be forgiven.
The end was a let down though, but the journey there was brilliant.
So, I've decided to go on a bit of King kick now, and am reading The Stand.
The best thriller I've ever read. Part one will keep you highly interested with the vivid and intricate details of the Jackal's plans for the assasination. Part 2 is completely un-put-down-able once Forysth introduces the perfect foil to the Jackal.
Having exposed a group of fraudulent spiritualists, investigative journalist Joanna Cross is intrigued by the claims of psychologist Dr Sam Towne that paranormal phenomena do in fact exist.
Accepting his challenge to enter into a scientific experiment to 'create' a ghost, Joanna, Sam and six volunteers bring to life 'Adam Wyatt' - a young American living in France after the American War of Independence. Associated with the great minds and mystics at the close of the eighteenth century, he dies tragically in the French Revolution. The experiment is a great success, with poltergeist activity and disembodied messages all scientifically recorded.
Sam's theory appears conclusive - that ghosts are created by the people who see them. But a series of inexplicable and ominous events force Joanna and Sam to realize the ghost they have brought to life can also cause death...
A really thought-provoking book. Not the best of novels, but at least it's one that makes the reader think. Leaving aside the dramatic devices natural to a fictional story, it begs the question: even if ghosts & 'the spirit world' are merely the creations of human minds alone - in effect, we make our so-called phantoms - why then do these creations sometimes take on a negative aspect?