ThehatchetMan
Plz look at Me! Pay attention to Me!
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2020
- Messages
- 7,418
- Supports
- Crusaders FC
They're designed to be casual games from the outset, and also to appeal to people who struggle with traditional shooters. Character abilities are never balanced and only get worse as more characters/abilities get added. With Overwatch high level games are just boring slogs, who wins is usually decided by which team sync up their ults better. And a big problem with hero shooters is how poorly they translate to spectating and casting in esports events.
Even Valorant, which was designed to be the competitive non-respawn hero shooter equal to CS, is an omnishambles. It's a graveyard for failed American CS players, propped up by Tencent money. For some reason China has fallen in love with hero shooters much like they fell in love with, and then ruined, PUBG.
Could this same argument not be applied to L0L or DOTA? OK they're not shooters. But your arguments for character abilities and balancing could be applied the same? Similarly team sync and ults can have a huge impact in those games too. I don't really spectate overwatch as an esports so can't comment on the spectacle.
Personally I stand by the thought that OW problem was the team size more. If it was built as a 4v4 or 5v5 from the off then I think it would have taken off more. 6v6 was just too large.
I think alot of your argument applies more to Apex Legends because in my eyes that is alot less balanced as a hero shooter. I think overwatch is ace though. And I know I'm a bias fan boy here.
The problem with Overwatch is that having a very bad player on your team has a larger impact than a very good player. Smurfing isn't as easy as it is on other shooter gamers were it's very easy to carry a game. Don't get me wrong you can smurf against the worst very easily but a player in masters won't carry a gold player as easily as they would in other games. And for me this is another sign of why it's such a good game because team comp and communication is so vitally important.
And lastly alot of other shooters have perks, items, guns etc you choose which are often very unbalanced. Cod4 was all about the ak47, m16, mp5 and ak74u along with the sniper. The rest of the guns were rarely used.
Whereas in Overwatch Zarya was a beast a few seasons back and now isn't so good. Hamster however has had a buff and is now a wrecking force when before he could have been seen as a troll pick.
I think we may have to agree to disagree though here. And I am a fan boy so yeh.
Not really played or looked at valorent so can't really comment on it.