Test draft - Ijazz vs Chris Nelson

Who will win the test series?

  • Ijazz to win 1-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris to win 2-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris to win 3-0

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Chris to win 2-1

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .

Varun

Moderator
Staff
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
46,831
Location
Mumbai
Welcome to the third match of the test draft!

  • Judge the players on their peaks excluding any 6-12 month purple patch.
  • Vote for the team you think will win a 3 match test series between these 2 sides based on the given nature of pitches.
  1. 1st test: Good batting pitch.
  2. 2nd test: Slow wicket which gets worse as the game goes on and will assist spinners heavily.
  3. 3rd test: Green top. Assists pace, seam and swing bowling.
 
Lineups:

Team Chris:


Atherton
Dilshan
Ponting
Greig
Ian Chappell
Boucher
Shastri
Bravo
Hughes (Tests 1,3) / McDermott (Test 2)
Zaheer Khan
Anderson

Team Ijazz:

Gary Kirsten
Roy Fredericks
Kane Williamson
Mohammad Yousuf
Graham Thorpe
Ab de Villiers† (C)
Nathan Astle (Plays 1st and 3rd Test Match)
Iqbal Qasim
Brett Lee
Jeff Thomson
Glenn McGrath
Abdur Rehman (Plays in the 2nd Test Match)
 
Last edited:
Ijazz writeup:
Team Ijazz

11b4bhq.png


Picture1.png

Picture2.png

 
Last edited:
Batting

Opening the batting for me is Gary Kirsten, well known to the world for his flair, temperament and hardwork. He was the bedrock of the South African batting line-up for well over a decade and one of the most reliable batsmen of his time. His determination and desire to bat long innings and score plentiful of runs was balanced aesthetically with a very unique technique. His highest score of 275, the second longest innings in Test History, batting for over 14 hours is a testament to his character. Partnering Kirsten is a slightly less familiar name, but nonetheless an important one. Roy Fredericks was only a handful of batsmen that distinguished themselves in devising a counter-attacking style to the great pace-bowlers of the 1970s. Freddo as his teammates fondly called him was a destructive batsman. He is probably best known for the Windies tour of Australia in 1975-76, where he took on the might of Lillee-Thomson. The harder they banged the ball in, the harder he cut and hooked. For example, into the second morning of a test match, he opened to what might have been a diffident reply to Australia's 329: at lunch West Indies were 130 for one, off 14 eight-ball overs; the 200 came up in the 22nd. Fredericks went on to reach a hundred from 71 balls and, though he grew tired, turned it into a match-winning 169. He is a perfect counter-weight to Kirsten batting style.

Coming a wicket down is a Legend in the Making. Kane Williamson, might be young in age, but has already fostered a reputation as becoming a future great. Calm, serene and intelligent and with the ability to belt a shot as well as block admirably, Williamson will be a vital cog in the middle order to build a long innings. Batting at 4, is another talisman, Pakistan’s elegant amasser, Mohammad Yousuf. The late Bob Woolmer, likened him to a Ferrari when batting and a truck when he isn’t. With the innate ability to rack up tons and tons of runs, he will play a vital role when the team bats alongside Williamson. During the early 2000s, Graham Thorpe had already established himself as a complete batsman. With the ability to attack against both Pace and Spin and defend. Perfect examples of these are the contrasts in which he scored one of the quickest double centuries in history at Christchurch, hitting 28 fours and four sixes and juxtaposing it with his innings of 118 at Lahore, comprising of just 2 boundaries, a world record even now.

Captain, wicketkeeper, and innovator all rolled into one, Ab de Villiers will undoubtedly go down as one of the greatest to play the game. For now, he has to be content with the best in the modern sport. One of the most versatile shot makers in the game is also one who has method to his defensive strokes as the article linked to him suggests. Here’s another article that contrasts the first and showcases his 360 degree in full. Nathan Astle, might best be remembered for owning the title of the quickest double century in world cricket, but his game is about more than that. When Astle retired, his place in New Zealand history seemed secure: 3rd highest Test run-scorer, 3rd highest Test century-maker, 2nd highest ODI run-scorer and highest ODI century-maker. He was a vital cog in the team beyond his ability to just score runs, scoring them at key moments and adding to the team in other ways. He may not be remembered as a great player, but for playing some of the best innings witnessed in a New Zealand shirt. The irresistible entertainer completes my batting line-up.


Bowling

Opening the bowling is none other than Pidge. McGrath has seen it all and done it all. The definition of consistency, his ability to bowl in the “corridor of uncertainty” with an immaculate length, caused problems to even the best of batsmen. Over time, he gained the off-cut and bounce, and specialized in the opposition's biggest wickets - especially Atherton's and Brian Lara's - and he was unafraid to back himself publicly in these key duels. He is the leading wicket taker of all time for a fast bowler. He’s so good that I couldn’t even find one single brilliant article to link him with. But if it’s any consolation, players being mentioned as the “Next McGrath”, will provide insurance to the greatness of this man. His bowling partner is someone that literally frightens batsmen. Jeff Thomson intimidated cricketers like no one before him and no one has truly replicated after him. With his slinging action, he regularly bowled in the mid 150’s and 160’s Kph. His bowling style, often compared to a Javelin thrower, not only generated tremendous pace, but also enabled Thommo to generate great control over his deliveries. His bouncers in his own words; I could bowl a bouncer much fuller than everybody else because I could get it to sort of jump like a cobra. It was a bit of a blessing. It was the style I was given.

Someone who is not shy of bowling at pace himself, Brett Lee was the more modern cut from the same cloth to Jeff Thomson. Although, he didn't earn the tag of a true Test great, Lee finished his career as Australia’s fourth most successful bowler with 310 scalps. He worked as a brutal support for over a decade to the likes of McGrath and Gillespie. At his best, he gained outswing with the new ball and reverse with the older one, making him even more difficult for batsmen trying to steady themselves while knowing he could reach 160kph. Despite being curtailed by injuries, he became a smarter operator under Ricky Ponting's captaincy and knew when to deliver a burst of speed or a containing spell. In nine Tests following McGrath's departure, Lee stood up with 58 victims at 21.55 and also won the Allan Border Medal in 2008.

The main focus for spin comes from Iqbal Qasim, the quiet and silent assassin to Abdul Qadir during the 1970s. Whilst, Qadir has ended up becoming one of Pakistan’s greatest spinners, it is unbelievable to note that Qasim finished his career with numbers better than his partner. Qasim was a miserly but penetrative spinner. He may not have possessed the variations modern slow left armers possess today, but he didn’t need to. The most impressive element about his bowling was the economy rate, barely going at above 2 an over. This enabled Qasim to bowl longer spells, bowl unchanged. The persistent accuracy just kept batsmen cautious, respectful & muted in their approach. Qasim was a workhorse, an underrated bowler. In spin favouring conditions, another Pakistani spinner joins him; Abdur Rehman. A wily left arm spinner who bowls accurately & economically with nagging control, perseverance to keep plugging away on a line & length knowing the rewards will eventually pay off & the containment to keep the batsmen under pressure, controlling the flow of runs & keeping proceedings as tight as possible. Rehman’s bowling philosophy is built around bowling dot deliveries & maiden overs. He will just keep on doing this in the hope & backing that batsmen will succumb to the pressure, resulting in a lapse of concentration. Rehman was the joint quickest Pakistan spinner to 50 test wickets, getting to the feat in 11 test matches. Often, described as an 'unsung hero' who will tie an end down reliably, him and Qasim will inevitable put batsmen under tremendous pressure.


Game Plan
  • Match 1: Chris has a good team lined up, with Ponting being the obvious notable name. His middle order is solid, if unspectacular and is not easy to beat. In a match with little to no assistance for bowlers, it is likely to be a close game, but the hope will be that the presence of Qasim stifling runs at one end, and a pace attack at the other, bowlers will be able to slow down the runs. Atherton is a solid opener, but he is also McGrath’s bunny and it won’t be long before the middle order, despite being slightly long is exposed. From a batting perspective, his bowlers are unlikely to get any joy against my batting. A draw or a win is expected from my team.

  • Match 2: For a deteriorating pitch, Qasim is joined by fellow spinner Rehman. Both are miserly in their long bowling spells, with each closing down the options for batsmen. As the match proceeds, I expect the spin duo to be instrumental in a win.

  • Match 3: Despite having two proponents of swing bowling in Zaheer Khan and Anderson, it is worth noting that Glenn McGrath and Brett Lee and to an extent Jeff Thomson, have superior records in swinging/seaming conditions than Chris’s bowlers. McGrath’s record particularly is outstanding and Lee’s demolition job in New Zealand is well known. If the match is to be won due to better bowling, then my team has a better chance of achieving that.
 
Chris's write up:

As mentioned on thread ignore the above, below is how it should read (above I would end up with 4 Australians in one match)

1. M. A. Atherton (Mat 115, Bat 37.69) – Nicknamed cockroach due to his difficulty to dismiss, Michael Atherton will be remembered as one of England’s great battlers, a fact backed up by no innings more than his 185 not out over 643 minutes in South Africa 20 years ago. Any Test that looked done and dusted was anything but with Atherton at the crease.
2. T. M. Dilshan (Mat 87, Bat 40.98) – Completing an opening partnership with over 200 Test matches, 13,000 runs and 32 hundreds between them is Tillakaratne Dilshan. Scoring his career runs at a S/R of 65.54, he is the perfect foil for Atherton (37.49). A first innings specialist, 11 of his 16 centuries came batting first, Dilshan is the ideal player to lay the foundations for a first innings lead for Team Nelson.
3. R. T. Ponting (Captain, Mat 168, Bat 51.85) – A player needing little introduction, Ricky Ponting is second only to Sachin Tendulkar in all time Test runs scored. Debuting with Tasmania at 17 and Australia at 20, Ponting went on to become one of the undisputed legends of the game. His record as captain was outstanding too, winning 62.33% of his matches when leading Australia, comfortably ahead of other modern players with 50+ matches as captain such as Smith, Border, Lloyd & Dhoni. The ideal player to come in at 3 in the event one of the openers fails, in my opinion Ponting’s average of 52 over 168 matches with 41 hundreds would see him easily walk in to an all-time Test XI.
4. A. W. Greig (Mat 58, Bat 40.43, Bowl 32.20) – Continuing a theme of battle hardened cricketers, Tony Greig bats at 4. As Cricinfo observes “he showed notable consistency and versatility: he made Test matches hundreds in fields as far flung as Bombay, Bridgetown and Brisbane, and against the likes of Lillee and Thomson, Roberts and Holding, Bedi and Chandra”. With 141 wickets taken at 32 apiece by his occasional off-spin, here we have a versatile cricketer who fits in perfectly to a top 4 full of leaders.
5. I. M. Chappell (Mat 75, Bat 42.42) – In at 5 is Ian Chappell. Another aggressive batsman afraid of no one. Undefeated in Test series’ as captain, Chappell loved nothing more than batting alongside his brother Greg. In the absence of him in this team, I’m sure Ian would relish the opportunity to be part of such a steely top 5.
6. M. Boucher (Mat 147, Bat 30.30, *** 555) – Taking the gloves is Mark Boucher. With a Test record 555 dismissals in Test matches, Boucher sits 139 ahead of his closest rival. Indeed his 532 catches is even more remarkable when considering no one else has even made it to 400 yet. A safer glove man we could not wish for to keep for our bowling attack. An international career spanning 15 years, yet another man you would love to have on your team as you go to war. To quote Cricinfo again “As a batsman Boucher lived for the big moment, the quick 30 or 40 his team needed to win a match, or the session that had to be spent at the crease to ensure a draw”.
7. R. J. Shastri (Mat 80, Bat 35.79, Bowl 40.96) – In to all-rounder territory we go and first up is Ravi Shastri, one of the great Indian cricketers of the 80’s. Scoring over 3,800 Test runs at nearly 36, he also brings to the table 151 wickets with his left-arm spin. An able deputy to the captains of his time, Shastri would be a great go-to guy for any of the captaincy candidates listed above. It’s worth noting that out of all players who have played 10 or more Tests against Australia, only one averages more with the bat than Shastri’s 77.75. Another highly committed player.
8. D. J. Bravo (Mat 40, Bat 31.42, Bowl 39.83) – Full of confidence and flair, Dwayne Bravo is the ideal number 8 no matter how the innings may be going. Here is a player that in all honesty should have played double the 40 Tests his record will almost certainly show indefinitely. Unfortunate in a way to have come through the ranks in the 00’s, a time of turbulence between the WICB and the players which still rumbles on to this day. Combined with injuries this held back a player who surely would have finished his Test career with a batting average higher than the 31.42 and bowling lower than the 39.83 he achieved. A fantastic one day player, if the match comes down the final session of the final day, few players would be more welcome on a team sheet than Bravo.
9. M. G. Hughes (Mat 53, Bat 16.64, Bowl 28.38) – One of the most recognisable cricketers of recent times, Merv Hughes is certainly one bowler a lot of batsmen would prefer not to see at the end of his run-up. Two of his most memorable series’ came when his bowling partner was injured – in 1988/89 against West Indies when Geoff Lawson broke his jaw, Hughes went on to take a hat trick and 13 wickets in the second Test. Then in the 1993 Ashes when Craig McDermott was ruled out, Hughes went on to take 31 wickets, propelling the team to a 4-1 victory. As number 9’s go he would also add handy runs lower down the order.
10. Z Khan (Mat 92, Bowl 32.94) – Zaheer Khan’s left arm quicks accounted for 311 wickets over 14 years. A master of swing with balls new and old, Khan is a clever cricketer with a reputation for weaning out weaknesses in batsmen before moving in for the kill. India, their bowling attack spearheaded by Khan claimed the number 1 ranking in Tests as well as the World Cup in 2011. Of all Indian fast bowlers, only Kapil Dev has more wickets than Zaheer Khan and he will open the bowling with my number 11, introducing….
11. J. M. Anderson (Mat 116, Bowl 28.33) – Only 5 bowlers in history have more Test wickets have more wickets than Jimmy Anderson, and none that are still playing. 70 wickets clear at the top of the records for England, few bowlers that have ever played the game come close to the skill levels possessed by Anderson. On the winning side in 3 Ashes campaigns, Anderson still shows no signs of slowing down. Without a doubt taking the new ball alongside Khan, there is no one I would trust more than Jimmy to break the opening partnership and rifle through the middle order. Although he bats at 11, Anderson has 58 not outs in his 159 Test innings with a high score of 81 against India at Trent Bridge, meaning he should not be considered a mere rabbit.
12. C. J. McDermott (Mat 71, Bowl 28.63) – Coming in as a direct replacement for Merv Hughes in the second Test only, Craig McDermott was Australia’s premier strike bowler in the early 1990’s. As suggested by his 291 wickets at a S/R of 56.9, on his day he could tear through any batting lineup. When fit, McDermott was one of the finest swing bowlers of his generation. 84 of his wickets came against England, including 8 x 5 wicket hauls.

Lineups:
Atherton
Dilshan
Ponting
Greig
Chappell
Boucher
Shastri
Bravo
Hughes (Tests 1,3) / McDermott (Test 2)
Khan
Anderson


In conclusion, a team of mental & physical steel in the extreme (as I may have mentioned a few times in the player write ups!). I challenge any team in this Draft to go toe to toe with Team Nelson’s Warriors and come out on top!
Over 1,000 Test matches between them including the 2nd highest run scorer, 6th highest wicket taker and highest number of dismissals of all time.
Although I have committed a fairly unforgiveable sin by not selecting a specialist spinner, I am confident in the ability of Tony Greig to pick up a few wickets and in my team as a whole to win the Series.
 
Ah, Khan in Chris's team is Zaheer! When I first read lineup I thought it is Imran and was very impressed with his XI. It is still v.good but if that had been Imran...(I should hv looked at his batting position and guessed though in fairness)
 
Ah, Khan in Chris's team is Zaheer! When I first read lineup I thought it is Imran and was very impressed with his XI. It is still v.good but if that had been Imran...(I should hv looked at his batting position and guessed though in fairness)
Edited to avoid confusion
 
@ChrisNelson Why play Bravo in match 1? You don't need 8 batsmen on a batting paradise but could do with one extra full fledged bowler

Point taken, but a strong batting lineup which I believe I have would be difficult to dislodge twice in 5 days as well as outscoring. In Anderson & Khan I believe I have 2 of the best bowlers possible for finding that little ray of light there might be.
 
Point taken, but a strong batting lineup which I believe I have would be difficult to dislodge twice in 5 days as well as outscoring. In Anderson & Khan I believe I have 2 of the best bowlers possible for finding that little ray of light there might be.
Fair enough. I just think its an overkill. Also what are your plans for the spin tracks? Wanted to point out that you unfortunately drew against a team that has McGrath. Artherton is next to useless against him.

@Ijazz17 Why drop Astle for the spin friendly track and bat only till 6?
 
Fair enough. I just think its an overkill. Also what are your plans for the spin tracks? Wanted to point out that you unfortunately drew against a team that has McGrath. Artherton is next to useless against him.

@Ijazz17 Why drop Astle for the spin friendly track and bat only till 6?
Just wanted to go in for the Kill. I had faith in my batsmen to get the job done.
 
I think the first Test would end a draw. Chris has piled plenty of batsmen into that line-up and I don't think Qasim will contribute many wickets there. Conversely, Hughes-Zaheer-Anderson isn't going to get the job done either.

On the second pitch, much as I like Tony Greig and think he will contribute, having two specialist spinners to none really favours Jazz here. His spinners aren't really attacking spinners, more into containment, but the supporting bowling cast is good too, think McGrath will still play an important role.

Third pitch is also advantage Jazz because of his seamers. Again, McGrath is just so good on these surfaces, and I think Thomson will be a real handful too.
 
Fair enough. I just think its an overkill. Also what are your plans for the spin tracks? Wanted to point out that you unfortunately drew against a team that has McGrath. Artherton is next to useless against him.

@Ijazz17 Why drop Astle for the spin friendly track and bat only till 6?

I have to confess, although it's obvious anyway, that I neglected the spin situation while the draft was going on. Therefore Greig & Shastri are my only options on this front. Note to counter your point about Atherton that Shastri averages 80 against Australia and his 2 main quicks are both Aussies. What my team lacks in quality (and it's not much) it more than makes up for in ferocious competitiveness, especially at the top end of the order.
 
@Varun, Can you please edit Nelson's lineup that it is Ian Chappell and not Greg.

I'd be honest, I haven't seen a lot of these players, and don't remember some of them, so would be reliant more on stats. Favouring Ijazz's side is a bit better as it is coming down to quality of spinner(s). I like Chris' MO, but Jazzy has hell of some fast bowlers. Will see how the arguments go before voting
 
Iqbal Qasim, batting at 7 for my opponent, averages 13 in Test matches. I would argue I'm playing against a weak batting lineup and have the bowlers to dismiss them relatively cheaply. Could the same be said about my lineup, yes I agree their bowling attack is strong but I bat much further down and getting to the bottom 5/6 at all will be no easy feat.
 
I'm in a bad mood. Why does Ijazz look like he's playing with 12 men?
 
Nathan Astle plays 1st and 3rd Test, Abdur Rehman plays in the 2nd Test, the other 10 play all 3 so always 11 in the lineup.
 
Iqbal Qasim, batting at 7 for my opponent, averages 13 in Test matches. I would argue I'm playing against a weak batting lineup and have the bowlers to dismiss them relatively cheaply. Could the same be said about my lineup, yes I agree their bowling attack is strong but I bat much further down and getting to the bottom 5/6 at all will be no easy feat.
I agree my tail isn't very long, but the batsmen I have are all specialists in batting and their only responsibility is to score runs. The same can't be said about the likes of Shastri, Greig, Bravo all of whom can do a bit of both. Like Mourinho said today, You need specialists to win a match, a trophy supplemented by 1-2 mutli functionals. My team exemplifies Mourinho's vision. :p And at no point does Qasim come in at No 7. The shortest tail I have is in the Spin match and Lee is likelier to be the first of the tail to come onto the pitch.

I'm in a bad mood. Why does Ijazz look like he's playing with 12 men?
I have given a write-up and supplied an infograph for all the 12 players, but the actual players per match is given in the OP.
Nathan Astle plays the 1st and 3rd Match.
Abdur Rehman replaces him in the second.
 
Not happy with @Ijazz17 not only trying to steal my tables, but also trying one up them.

Not cool man, so not cool.
 
Not happy with @Ijazz17 not only trying to steal my tables, but also trying one up them.

Not cool man, so not cool.
Well, at least you got props for it. I got nothing. :|

The pioneer always get the credit, us evolutionists are always scorned at. :p
 
First test draw. Next two I think Ijazz's team will win. I don't fancy Chris's openers vs Ijazz's seam attack in 3rd test. I don't rate Bravo and Shastri highly as well and I see Ijazz's team better suited in seaming conditions. I didn't follow the draft properly but if conditions of the 3 tests will be like this was known from start, Chris missed a trick by not having proper spinner. Shastri is not really a lead spinner candidate.
 
Also, when Chris has both Mcdermott and Hughes in side, Bravo has no business being there in 3rd test. Batting wise, in seaming condition, especially vs bowling Ijazz has, Bravo won't do much. Bowling wise though both Mcdermott and Hughes are at different level to Bravo.
 
I don't think spin is going to play much part if at all. Ijazz has the slightly better spinners but neither is good enough to cause any problems to the batters. Also, I thought Greig was a seam bowler not spinner?

I like both pace attacks. Anderson is one of the best swing bowlers I have seen and support cast of Khan, McDermott, Hughes, Greig etc is quite good as well. McGrath, Lee and Thompson is quite good as well. Ijazz has pace in Brett lee which I think Chris lacks.

Batting wise is again quite even. Ijazz has the better opening pair primarily down to Atherton being completely useless in this game (Worst draw Chris could have had in that regard). If pushed I'd say the sheer numbers in Chris' team probably give him the edge. Ijazz has a long tail and I don't rate Astle all that highly either (And six seems to be too low for him).
 
Chris should have started with Hughes/McDermott for all three matches instead of Bravo, I've no idea on what he would offer in test matches.
He could also started with Ravi with Atherton instead of Dilshan,His middle order looks solid.
 
I don't think spin is going to play much part if at all. Ijazz has the slightly better spinners but neither is good enough to cause any problems to the batters. Also, I thought Greig was a seam bowler not spinner?

I like both pace attacks. Anderson is one of the best swing bowlers I have seen and support cast of Khan, McDermott, Hughes, Greig etc is quite good as well. McGrath, Lee and Thompson is quite good as well. Ijazz has pace in Brett lee which I think Chris lacks.

Batting wise is again quite even. Ijazz has the better opening pair primarily down to Atherton being completely useless in this game (Worst draw Chris could have had in that regard). If pushed I'd say the sheer numbers in Chris' team probably give him the edge. Ijazz has a long tail and I don't rate Astle all that highly either (And six seems to be too low for him).
I know my spinners are not aggressive attacking spinners like Murali or Warne, but they gone onto amass a very healthy amount of wickets based on sheer consistency time and again. Qasim was Abdul Qadir's calm and serene partner who ended his career with better numbers than his famous counter-part. Abdur Rehman, though joined the game late at the age of 26, still ended his career with an average less than 30. That's better than some of other bowlers picked in the draft. Just because they don't look enticing on paper doesn't make them less effective. They will starve the opposition of runs, force them to make mistakes through sheer consistency.

I also have Thommo who is quicker than Lee. ;). McGrath averages less than 20 in England and in New Zealand and Lee averages less than 20 in New Zealand. None of Chris's bowlers come close to matching that average.

I understand you don't rate Astle, but his fastest double century record against England still stands today. He's more than a good batsman I would say.
 
I know my spinners are not aggressive attacking spinners like Murali or Warne, but they gone onto amass a very healthy amount of wickets based on sheer consistency time and again. Qasim was Abdul Qadir's calm and serene partner who ended his career with better numbers than his famous counter-part. Abdur Rehman, though joined the game late at the age of 26, still ended his career with an average less than 30. That's better than some of other bowlers picked in the draft. Just because they don't look enticing on paper doesn't make them less effective. They will starve the opposition of runs, force them to make mistakes through sheer consistency.

I also have Thommo who is quicker than Lee. ;). McGrath averages less than 20 in England and in New Zealand and Lee averages less than 20 in New Zealand. None of Chris's bowlers come close to matching that average.

I understand you don't rate Astle, but his fastest double century record against England still stands today. He's more than a good batsman I would say.

Strike rate of 76 though which is on the poor side. Rehman is barely eligible for the draft so I'm not taking his stats too seriously.

That's one of my favourite innings in Tests but let's face it, it was essentially a slogfest because Astle had nothing to lose at that point. Overall though, he hasn't got a great record at 6 either and isn't all that in any position.
 
Strike rate of 76 though which is on the poor side. Rehman is barely eligible for the draft so I'm not taking his stats too seriously.

That's one of my favourite innings in Tests but let's face it, it was essentially a slogfest because Astle had nothing to lose at that point. Overall though, he hasn't got a great record at 6 either and isn't all that in any position.
Strike rates are more relevant to a pace bowler, since they don't bowl exceedingly long spells and require instant results. It hardly matters for a spinner since they can easily bowl a 12-15 over spell in one go. If you have a look at all the top spinners in the world, barring Murali and Warne, most strike rates fall in the 60s and 70s. Some of the old timers like Subhash Gupte and the best left arm spinner in this draft, Derek Underwood average 75 and 73 respectively, yet they are hailed by their contemporaries.

If you look at things in that manner, many renowned records are like that. McCullum's quickest century, many of Sehwag's innings etc. He's there to keep things moving along and is versatile enough as I mentioned to make a quick knock or defend as per the requirements.
 
Strike rates are more relevant to a pace bowler, since they don't bowl exceedingly long spells and require instant results. It hardly matters for a spinner since they can easily bowl a 12-15 over spell in one go. If you have a look at all the top spinners in the world, barring Murali and Warne, most strike rates fall in the 60s and 70s. Some of the old timers like Subhash Gupte and the best left arm spinner in this draft, Derek Underwood average 75 and 73 respectively, yet they are hailed by their contemporaries.

If you look at things in that manner, many renowned records are like that. McCullum's quickest century, many of Sehwag's innings etc. He's there to keep things moving along and is versatile enough as I mentioned to make a quick knock or defend as per the requirements.

Never heard of them. For me low 65 is a reasonably good number in a draft when you're bowling to really good batsmen.

Sehwag is hardly a slogger. McCullum I'd agree with you. Regardless, I don't think that record has much significance here.
 
FFS Ricky Ponting in an all time test xi??? He won't even by number 3 in Australia's all time xi.
 
I don't think spin is going to play much part if at all. Ijazz has the slightly better spinners but neither is good enough to cause any problems to the batters. Also, I thought Greig was a seam bowler not spinner?
Greig could bowl both fast-medium as well as offspin, imo his offspin was better. Also, how do you not know this given we drafted him in the last test draft? :p
 
Chris should have started with Hughes/McDermott for all three matches instead of Bravo, I've no idea on what he would offer in test matches.
He could also started with Ravi with Atherton instead of Dilshan,His middle order looks solid.
He couldn't play both together without dropping one of Ponting or Chappell because of the nationality rule (3 max per nation). And those are his best batsmen.
 
Never heard of them. For me low 65 is a reasonably good number in a draft when you're bowling to really good batsmen.

Sehwag is hardly a slogger. McCullum I'd agree with you. Regardless, I don't think that record has much significance here.
Fair enough. From what I read, some of the bowlers of that time used to bowl around 50-60 over per innings. A direct conversion would mean, a spinner picks up around 5 wickets. That's certainly not bad if you ask me. Having two spinners of such ilk is only an advantage.
 
He couldn't play both together without dropping one of Ponting or Chappell because of the nationality rule (3 max per nation). And those are his best batsmen.
Unlucky there,his middle order is solid but that would be exposed to new ball and with Thomo and McGrath it would be difficult for his side pose big total.
 
Congratulations to @Ijazz17 on your resounding victory!!
Your initial picks cost you mate. As good as Anderson is, you could get him later. Boucher again, unless you're getting a gilchrist, de Villiers tier wk-batsman, no point going for one early.