FlawlessThaw
most 'know it all' poster
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2005
- Messages
- 29,688
Fair enough carrying might have been a bit strong - but there's no doubt that both Carvalho and Rio make Terry look better than he is. There's a place for defenders like Terry, but they have to be paired with someone who can read the game, organise the defence and stop attacks before they need a last ditch sliding tackle. Vidic plays a role similar to Terry for us, in that he is the bigger, braver, stronger, more aggressive of our centre backs. But I'd argue Vidic is a better defender than Terry.
Basically, it boils down to the fact that I really do not rate Terry, and it has nothing to do with my hatred of him as a player. I can't stand Gerrard, but I can accept he's a very good player. Terry simply isn't that good, and can actually be a liability a lot of the time for both Chelsea and England
Agreed mate. Vidic is a better defender than Terry, he has a bit more pace and his ability on the ball is underrated.