Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 52,146
Medvedev remains the best value on tour. Most people can’t pull off being that much of a tit.
Fognini will be his first real test. If he can get through that, I'll start taking him more seriously. He's gotten through the first 3 rounds comfortably but they've been against guys you'd expect him to beat in straight sets even if he's carrying an injury.Not great from Nadal, but he's been comfortable, and Norrie doesn't have anything to hurt him.
I stayed up for Osaka and a bit of Serena. When I went to sleep Felix was about to go a set up. I'm now tired as feck and surprised. Never heard of the Russian guy before Australia this year but happy for Dimitrov.So it is Dimitrov vs Karatsev and not Thiem vs Auger-Aliassime
Novak seems perfectly fine. Don't think there's any issues.with Djokovic’s issues
John Isner? Ivo Karlovic?Is there an uglier player to watch on tour than Raonic? Has one of the least aesthetic pleasing games I can think of.
Djokovic and his injuries anytime he is put into trouble on court.
Djokovic and his injuries anytime he is put into trouble on court.
Yeah he's got a reputation that he's never going to be able to get rid of now plus he obviously was exaggerating when he said he'd definitely torn a muscle, I can't imagine how he could play if he'd torn something, but there was clearly something wrong the other night.He was comfortably winning when he got injured. Then he lost 2 sets in a row
Is WTA viewership that bad that they are resorting to this?Birds are shitting all over the courts.
I don't think that's a reason to be playing best of 5 sets. Serena may be nearly 40 but she's hasn't won a slam since she had her daughter plus she is also the GOAT so it shouldn't be a huge surprise she is still competitive even at her age.Serena is a phenomenon, but gets frequently exposed when her matches go to three sets. Is the fact that an almost 40-year-old can hang with the younger players who are supposedly at the top of the game an indicator that the women need to be playing best of five sets in slams now?
I'd assume that the majority of the field are fit enough for the longer format, so is the only issue one of scheduling time or are the players against it, too?
No I'd say it's a testament to the weakness of characters in the women's game at the moment. Grand slam winners lose in the first few rounds, get double bageled and generally can't compete consistently.Is the fact that an almost 40-year-old can hang with the younger players who are supposedly at the top of the game an indicator that the women need to be playing best of five sets in slams now?
A shame that Dimitrov wasn't 100% fit but the story about Karatsev is amazing.
I think that's harsh. The WTA field has a lot more depth, especially compared to the ATP.No I'd say it's a testament to the weakness of characters in the women's game at the moment. Grand slam winners lose in the first few rounds, get double bageled and generally can't compete consistently.
Serena's level has fallen off a cliff with age and still betters the fitter, more athletic players.
Mental game seems very weak.
I just don't think they're consistent. GS winners losing in the first and second rounds to complete unknowns who remain unknown is very weak imo.I think that's harsh. The WTA field has a lot more depth, especially compared to the ATP.
I think that is starting to change now though, the likes of Osaka, Swiatek and even Barty (plus Andreescu if she can overcome the injury issues) are still young but I think there are signs that they will become more consistent presences in the latter rounds. I think it's good to have a bit of unpredictability, I don't think it's good for men's tennis that even now it's the same players at the top as it was a decade ago, but it is also important to create rivalries between some top players which can't happen if they're all so erratic.I just don't think they're consistent. GS winners losing in the first and second rounds to complete unknowns who remain unknown is very weak imo.
I prefer the era of the Henins, Clijsters, both Williams. When there was genuine competition on who wants to be the best.
I agree with this. Some of the younger players look really good and consistent meanwhile there are a number of other very good but inconsistent players.I think that is starting to change now though, the likes of Osaka, Swiatek and even Barty (plus Andreescu if she can overcome the injury issues) are still young but I think there are signs that they will become more consistent presences in the latter rounds. I think it's good to have a bit of unpredictability, I don't think it's good for men's tennis that even now it's the same players at the top as it was a decade ago, but it is also important to create rivalries between some top players which can't happen if they're all so erratic.
I agree as well. In fact, Swiatek is slowly becoming my new favourite.I think that is starting to change now though, the likes of Osaka, Swiatek and even Barty (plus Andreescu if she can overcome the injury issues) are still young but I think there are signs that they will become more consistent presences in the latter rounds. I think it's good to have a bit of unpredictability, I don't think it's good for men's tennis that even now it's the same players at the top as it was a decade ago, but it is also important to create rivalries between some top players which can't happen if they're all so erratic.