In theory, he could be one behind Rafa next time he’s on court.
In theory, he could be one behind Rafa next time he’s on court.
Well bit extraordinary
Most people consider Federer the GOAT, myself included. But what would it take for Nadal or Djokovic to surpass him in your opinion?
In the case of Nadal, I feel that it's not enough to just catch up to Federer in number of slams. The reason is simple: too many wins on sand. Right now, 12 out of his 19 slams were on sand. He needs many more wins on hard-court or grass, imo.
Djokovic is not a "specialist" like Nadal, though. He's good on both grass and hard-court. If he gets more slams than Federer, then is he not also the GOAT?
For me its pretty simple - the player with the most slams will be the GOAT. If more than one finish with the same slam count, then head to head matchups will come into play, as well as other factors like overall tournament victories and various less talked about achievements.
But let's say that a player wins 18 French Open,1 US Open, 1 Australian Open and 1 Wimbledon, bringing his total up to 21. Would that player really be regarded as the GOAT despite having 18 out of 21 wins on sand? It's an extreme example, but you get my point.
Era also matters a lot(though not in the Federer vs Nadal vs Djokovic debate). The current era must be considered the golden age(so far). 3 players looking like the'll reach 20 slams, all of whom have surpassed Sampras. It will probably take a while before something similar happens again. There may be someone who makes 25 slams in the future without facing a consistent worthy opponent along the way. That will surely not be nearly as impressive as what our current 3 greats have done.
That's obviously not what happened with Rafa though - he has won enough of the other tournaments to be considered the best of all time.
63% of his slam wins are on sand. It will be 65% if his next slam is French Open. That's pretty damn significant. Federer and Djokovic have more than twice as many slams on hard-court. That means that both of them are significantly better than Nadal on 2 out of 3 court types. Surely this must count for something?
I just came up with another tie-breaker in favor of Federer(should things be very even): his impressive comeback in 2017 and 2018. If the tables were turned: would Nadal and Djokovic in their mid 30's best a 30/31 year old Federer?
If it was 80 or 90% then that would be significant. If its in the 60s, then he would've won quite a few on other surfaces.
5 on hard, 2 on grass. Obviously not insignificant, but over the course of 14 years(if we start the clock from his first slam) it's not GOAT level stuff, imo. At least not when his competitors have 11 on hard-court(I use hard-court as the tie breaker, as the grass vs sand thing cancels itself out with both Djokovic and Federer being very weak on sand and Nadal being weak on grass).
I'd be fine with 60-70% wins on hard-court, as that makes up for 2 out of 4 slams. But on sand or grass it's way too much, imo.
I just came up with another tie-breaker in favor of Federer(should things be very even): his impressive comeback in 2017 and 2018. If the tables were turned: would Nadal and Djokovic in their mid 30's best a 30/31 year old Federer?
"Why do you think he is still playing at 40?" said Srdan Djokovic.
"Imagine that, a 40-year-old man still playing tennis, when he could go home and do some more interesting things.
"But since both Nadal and Novak are breathing down his neck, he simply cannot accept the fact that they will be better than him. Go man, raise children, do something else, go and ski, do something."
Apart not taking the test, I'm not sure what's wrong here? Countries where the tour is taking place have no restrictions I would guess?
Isn’t he an anti vaccer? Or have I made that up?Borna Coric has tested positive. Djokovic is not taking the test for some reason.
A lot of smaller players will not be happy with Djokovic. As this could potentially stop the tour for much longer. Djokovic should definitely resign from ATP council.
In fairness, this isn’t solely down to Djokovic, even if he and his people haven’t exactly helped matters. The Serbian health measures meant they could put on events like this, even if I would argue that they shouldn’t have done so, even if only in terms of optics (albeit it has turned out to be more serious than that).
In fairness, this isn’t solely down to Djokovic, even if he and his people haven’t exactly helped matters. The Serbian health measures meant they could put on events like this, even if I would argue that they shouldn’t have done so, even if only in terms of optics (albeit it has turned out to be more serious than that).
Fair point. That passed me by entirely.Just to point out that it was also hosted in Croatia and should have been hosted in two other countries from this part of Europe.
My point being is that it is not just Serbian officials; officials from the entire ex-Yu region are completely insane.
Dearie me. At least they have a ready made vaccine available*
*Magic water
I think the tournament itself was a good idea and seemed to be pretty well received, even if I didn't watch it myself.
That being said, the tournament had little to no measures in place for social distancing or ensuring everyone is safe. Viewing everything that went on, you'd have though COVID-19 was non-existent. My initial view was that they should have had some restrictions in place, if only for optics and to minimise criticism.