Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 52,146
Lopez v Simon doesn't ever really feel like it has gotten going. I think Lopez might need to win this in two, as he's starting to look a little tired, understandably.
It's 50% chance now.Mmmm.. not sure we'll see Novak/Nadal on the same side. Can't wait for the draw though.
Aye good final. Anderson would be seeded #4. Will love to see Djokovic / Nadal on the same side for once.
Mmmm.. not sure we'll see Novak/Nadal on the same side. Can't wait for the draw though.
Does it? First I've heard thatNah it's going to be Novak vs Anderson and Federer vs Nadal . 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3 alternates every year and this year it's 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. So Roger getting the #2 doesn't make much of a difference at all.
Even I'd never heard of it till I read it someplace on Twitter and then I checked out the draws for the last 6 years and it does indeed hold. Didn't have the patience to check beyond and couldn't find the official rules on this.Does it? First I've heard that
Definitely not a rule it’s by chance and usually it’s 50-50 as I’ve said.Even I'd never heard of it till I read it someplace on Twitter and then I checked out the draws for the last 6 years and it does indeed hold. Didn't have the patience to check beyond and couldn't find the official rules on this.
But if the rule/pattern holds it's Rafa vs Fed in the semis.
Maybe you're right and what I read was wrong. It has been true from something like atleast 2009 till 2018 though. I wonder if the pattern will continue.Definitely not a rule it’s by chance and usually it’s 50-50 as I’ve said.
Pretty sure in 2009 Nadal withdrew as defending champion so #1 wasn't in contention at the time.Maybe you're right and what I read was wrong. It has been true from something like atleast 2009 till 2018 though. I wonder if the pattern will continue.
Does it? First I've heard that
Yeah I guess you're right and it's just been a coincidence it's gone on this long. Anyway, all this is immaterial as I don't really see Rafa making the semifinals so doesn't matter if he's facing Roger or Novak.Pretty sure in 2009 Nadal withdrew as defending champion so #1 wasn't in contention at the time.
Otherwise that might have become a patter at some time, but still it's a draw so patterns do occur in 50-50% chance.
Of course we will see how the other players fall in the draw so being 2nd or 3rd makes a big difference.
Who cares...What about the women's draw??? Sexist pigsssssssssss
I much prefer the WTA, the games are so utterly ridiculous, much more entertaining to watch.Who cares...
Yup was such an easy draw here last year with Rafa having to potentially go through Del Potro, Novak and Roger back to back to win the title.Nadal finally with a tough draw. Roger should be happy with that. Djokovic too.
Pity we won't see Murray.
The only downside of GS matches is having to wait the women to stop fanning about before the men start.I much prefer the WTA, the games are so utterly ridiculous, much more entertaining to watch.
Yup was such an easy draw here last year with Rafa having to potentially go through Del Potro, Novak and Roger back to back to win the title.
Anyway, the draw has ensured Federer's path to the final because there's no way Rafa is making it through this draw
Also, like I was saying, the patter holds true for yet another year and it's 2 vs 3 this year.
Pretty tough would be an understatementNadal is having a lot of issues with big serve, big hitters during the first week. Last year he played pretty much very suitable opponents for him. QF/SF/F is of course another matter and usually you get to play top players, but that is the same for Federer and Djokovic from 4th round onwards.
This year is pretty tough for him no doubt. Cilic at 4th is the worst opponent you can get. Shapovalov/Tsonga can be tricky at 3rd and of course if Kyrgios is on fire can take him out.
As for the pattern yes, once again it came true.
Somehow, you just know, even if Rafa was 2nd seed, he'd still get this type of draw. Federer in maybe his last draw at Wimbledon isn't getting a draw like the Rafa one.Shouldn't even be Rafa's draw , Wimbledon seeding is a joke
What? Nick will play the match of his life and that's a very good chance Rafa goes out in R2 itself. If he makes it past that he's going to face a Tsonga that almost beat Federer last week or Shapovalov who looked very sharp in beating Novak yesterday. In R4 it's a Cilic (great grass court player) who just beat Rafa in straight sets day before and then comes Thiem who would probably be the easiest match from R2 till the QF. That says it all really about the draw.The draw looks worse on paper.
Thiem is the only good player up until the SF, but he'll probably get knocked out before the QF stage.
What? Nick will play the match of his life and that's a very good chance Rafa goes out in R2 itself. If he makes it past that he's going to face a Tsonga that almost beat Federer last week or Shapovalov who looked very sharp in beating Novak yesterday. In R4 it's a Cilic (great grass court player) who just beat Rafa in straight sets day before and then comes Thiem who would probably be the easiest match from R2 till the QF. That says it all really about the draw.
Ofcourse if he does somehow get through all of this, it's Roger and Novak back to back
Nick is crap and doesn't put in any effort unless he's up against the big players. He also particularly dislikes Novak and Rafa so he's absolutely going to be up for it. The talent Nick possesses isn't questionable, it's the attitude and in games like this, he'll be up for it.Kyrgios is a pretender who's been living off his win over Nadal in 2014. Not a very good player, though he does a good job of making people believe his attitude and not his lack of ability is what holds him back.
Most of those guys won't even end up reaching that far (it's why they're seeded so low), but if it does Nadal still has a great chance up until the SFs. As long as he's not too beat up, Nadal looked a different beast last year at Wimbledon and this year in Australia.
Disagree with this. His head to head against the big 3:Kyrgios is a pretender who's been living off his win over Nadal in 2014. Not a very good player, though he does a good job of making people believe his attitude and not his lack of ability is what holds him back.
Most of those guys won't even end up reaching that far (it's why they're seeded so low), but if it does Nadal still has a great chance up until the SFs. As long as he's not too beat up, Nadal looked a different beast last year at Wimbledon and this year in Australia.
I wouldn't read too much into exhibition resultsWhat? Nick will play the match of his life and that's a very good chance Rafa goes out in R2 itself. If he makes it past that he's going to face a Tsonga that almost beat Federer last week or Shapovalov who looked very sharp in beating Novak yesterday. In R4 it's a Cilic (great grass court player) who just beat Rafa in straight sets day before and then comes Thiem who would probably be the easiest match from R2 till the QF. That says it all really about the draw.
Ofcourse if he does somehow get through all of this, it's Roger and Novak back to back
Yeah Shapovalov probably won't be an issue but Cilic is a tough match on grass. Especially for something as early as R4.I wouldn't read too much into exhibition results
Yeah agreed, though I don't see it happening unfortunately.Yeah Shapovalov probably won't be an issue but Cilic is a tough match on grass. Especially for something as early as R4.
If Rafa somehow makes the final or wins here it'll probably be his greatest tennis achievement ever.