Mrs Smoker
Full Member
Third set point for Chardy. Don't feck it up now.
Sun doesn't set here until like 9 pm, so it's not that bad.I fear for Muguruza in the next round.........a massive joke to start a match so late
He has said after the match: "Something is totally wrong with my body....i don't what it is....i will go to a doctor in europe in the next days".Thiem is in trouble.
Zverev will go out in the 4th round.Had nothing left in the tank by the end. Well done Chardy.
Not banking on Zverev to make the semi. Way too volatile.
Sun doesn't set here until like 9 pm, so it's not that bad.
Yesterday was a fairly humid day despite not very hot (30C high). Obviously it’s not ideal with preparation to start so late but the condition both of them played in would be much more agreeable compared to those who did earlier.
To start the match at 0.20 am was only good for the tennis viewers in Europe, North America and South America......it's very bad for the players (Konta has said "It's very dangerous for the body", it's bad for the referee/ball kids/staff and it was so unfair for the fans at the Margaret Court Arena.Yesterday was a fairly humid day despite not very hot (30C high). Obviously it’s not ideal with preparation to start so late but the condition both of them played in would be much more agreeable compared to those who did earlier.
To start the match at 0.20 am was only good for the tennis viewers in Europe, North America and South America......it's very bad for the players (Konta has said "It's very dangerous for the body", it's bad for the referee/ball kids/staff and it was so unfair for the fans at the Margaret Court Arena.
With Zverev at Grand Slams you must always reckon it will be at least a four set match and Konta vs Muguruza have played very long matches in the past too.
Khachanov has got issues. His opponent had so much stamina though.Khachanov out to RBA in straight sets. Good news for Federer there.
Injury issues?Khachanov has got issues. His opponent had so much stamina though.
I don’t think it matters that much, RBA is decent but don’t think he can beat Cilic.Khachanov out to RBA in straight sets. Good news for Federer there.
Nah, he kept making mistakes then getting angry with himself then making even more mistakes.Injury issues?
Both of RBA's first two rounds went to 5 sets, so imagine that may well catch up to him against Cilic (assuming he beats Verdasco)
Nadal absolutely massacred De Minaur after a tense first 20 min. 6-1 1st set.
I think there't the case for preferring Cilic to Khachanov. Cilic is a bit predictable and he has a good record against him.I don’t think it matters that much, RBA is decent but don’t think he can beat Cilic.
Watched the first set and think he was excellent, but De Minaur has a lot of pressure on him and probably had the beatdown he received from Rafa at Wimbledon last year at the back of his mind.How's Nadal looked? Australian open is always his Achilles heel, he's always a bit undercooked for it after the damage a year on the tour does to him.
He looked good. Serve is a bit undercooked, couple of DFs here and there but his return and groundstrokes are still incredible.How's Nadal looked? Australian open is always his Achilles heel, he's always a bit undercooked for it after the damage a year on the tour does to him.
I think there't the case for preferring Cilic to Khachanov. Cilic is a bit predictable and he has a good record against him.
Cilic definitely has the game to push or beat Federer but from what I recall from the final last year it was a 5 set match that should have been finished sooner.Cilic pushed Fed pretty damn close last year and I think he’ll be more motivated this time around. I don’t think Khachanov has the baseline game to beat Fed even if he gets that far.
He got lucky with Federer fluffing up the tie break in the 2nd set but his level in the 4th was incredible, absolutely hit Roger off the court. I’d rather not having to worry about him replicating that over a couple of set or more.Cilic definitely has the game to push or beat Federer but from what I recall from the final last year it was a 5 set match that should have been finished sooner.
Well he's a set and break down to Verdasco.He got lucky with Federer fluffing up the tie break in the 2nd set but his level in the 4th was incredible, absolutely hit Roger off the court. I’d rather not having to worry about him replicating that over a couple of set or more.
2 set down now.Well he's a set and break down to Verdasco.
I think from the look of thing both Nadal and Fed will have the real challenge in the next round. Think both will be good matches to watch.
Federer I understand given he has close tie breaks in previous matches. Why do you think Nadal's will be close? He's been cruising hasn't he?Well he's a set and break down to Verdasco.
I think from the look of thing both Nadal and Fed will have the real challenge in the next round. Think both will be good matches to watch.
I think in both matches the first set will be key. Federer or Nadal take it and I think we'll see a fairly tight 3 or 4 set win.I think Fed will lose a set to Tsitsipas, whereas Nadal will cruise through a fairly long but routine 6-4 7-5 6-4 win (or sth close to it).
Federer I understand given he has close tie breaks in previous matches. Why do you think Nadal's will be close? He's been cruising hasn't he?