CallyRed
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 12,725
Now he has signed for Spurs, I can say that I never wanted him anyway and he is overrated.
based on what? his Youtube comp
He is not an Eriksen replacement.
Who loses their place to this guy in your first XI in your opinion?
But a much much better passerHe is a Dembele replacement.Ndombele is a similar player to Dembele with his runs and technical ability to get past a player or some burst of pace from defensive midfield space forward but I would say less energy,intensity in him than Dembele.
Also mostly plays in a 2 in a 4231 and limited in a tactical standpoint.
Good player but slightly overrated.
I like him, and he's pretty good, but I can't see him being a steal at that price. How many central midfielders have ever gone for more? Maybe 1-2?Congratulations Spurs for pulling off the signing of the summer so far. Great player will be a steal at that price and will further strengthen the Spuds
Congratulations Spurs for pulling off the signing of the summer so far. Great player will be a steal at that price and will further strengthen the Spuds
65m is not a steal, but it is a good deal. Oh, and to insist he needs to match the influence of De Bruyne or Silva to justify that price tag is pushing it a bit too far.There's absolutely no way anyone will ever consider him a steal at 65 million pounds. He'd need to least propel Spurs to trophies in the same way as the likes of De Bruyne and Bernado Silva have for City.
More likely he does a decent job and helps Spurs to a top four finish again. Whilst Pogba puts in another 15/15 + season and we have to sit through another year's worth of tripe about him being a waste of 90 million pounds.
65m is not a steal, but it is a good deal. Oh, and to insist he needs to match the influence of De Bruyne or Silva to justify that price tag is pushing it a bit too far.
De Bruyne went for 55m in 2015 man. Fees are crazy these days. We are being quoted 50m for McGinn&Tonic (according to that unmentionable rag)Is it? He's moved with a fee comparable to the one City paid for De Bruyne so it isn't so far fetched to suggest he should have a comparable impact on his side (obviously that impact can be different to what De Bruyne does for City)
He costs 36x the amount roy Keane went for though so a bit steep on that metricIs it? He's moved with a fee comparable to the one City paid for De Bruyne so it isn't so far fetched to suggest he should have a comparable impact on his side (obviously that impact can be different to what De Bruyne does for City)