I said cheap option - we have £100m to spend net. The players you have quoted are £40m+
- Jonathan David will still sell for 35-40m
- Barcelona paid 40m for Victor Roque
- Sesko - release claus of 45m
So the options you left are Guirassy (unproven in the league) and Pavlidis who is a nobody. Also you complain about Welbeck not being able to finish but Che Adams is absolutely useless in front of goal?
I think we've got a budget of around 100m with the rest coming from sales. That's not much but it can get us a long way if we act smart. For example there's a number of half decent CBs available on a free from Tosin to Kelly right to Rugani and Hermoso. In midfield there's Guido Rodriguez and Rabiot on a free as well. Then one has to consider young talent such as Anselmino, Nypan and Roony and of course one can't forget very promising kids who had somehow made the wrong move and are causing all sort of mischief such as Roque + players with 1 year left on their contract such as Jonathan David. Clubs facing the latter two scenarios tend to be desperate to sell and will settle for financial arrangements that vastly accommodate the buyer especially since many clubs are not in a great financial situation. That include a loan with obligation to buy (in case of Roque it might also be a right to buy), comfortable installments spread across a number of years and who knows maybe swap + fees as well.
For the love of god I am not saying that all of these players are United level. All I am saying is that they are interesting options to consider especially around boosting the squad players department. For example we can sell Maguire for 10m-20m and bring Tosin on a free (2m-3m signing on fee?). Add the fact that Maguire is on an eye watering 10m salary per year while Tosin is on around 2m, then even if we double his salary then we look set to make a net profit of around 17m-23m between salary and fee. So yes money can be provided if we act smart
Guirassy scored 24 goals in 24 games this season in the Bundesliga. Some call him a one year wonder which I find it unfair. Sure this season was off the charts but previously he was a consistent goal scorer. Last season for example he scored 13 goals in 26 games including a goal vs Bayern. He also scored a goal against Brazil. The season before he scored 12 goals in 46 games in France and the season before that it was 12 goals in 31 games in France as well (1 VS Chelsea). Pavlidis scored 28 goals in 32 matches in the Eredivisie. Similarly to Guirassy he's been a consistent top scorer for quite some time. Are they the new Haaland? I doubt it. There again prior to joining City, Haaland was scoring goals in Germany, Norway and Austria which are hardly the EPL and La Liga. If we won't better talent then we'll have to dig deeper in our pockets. I don't necessarily agree with that considering that I believe that Hojlund is a good player and shouldn't become a backup player himself. There's also the issue that we've got too many positions to fill which means that the budget will be spread thin.
Now at the big elephant at the room ie Welbeck. Danny loves us, he used to have quick feet, decent workrate and technique. The former two qualities might go with time, the latter less so. However we also know his weaknesses. First of all he is horrible in front of goal. Welbeck have not scored double digits in a season since 2017-2018 and prior to that he managed to do so in 2014-15. Our forwards do not trust Hojlund despite having one of the highest goal conversion in the EPL. Can you imagine them trusting Danny Welbeck?
Then there's the issue of him being injury prone. According to transfermarkt Welbeck has been out of injury for a staggering 1236 days in 13 years. Now consider his age, the fact that he's injury prone and that we're not very good in dealing with them then what's the point in even signing him? Assuming that by some miracle he's fit when we need him would you really trust the guy to score goals?
During the treble season we had 4 strikers covering 2 roles. Fast forward to present time and the squad is far from perfect, we have to replace half the squad, the treatment room is crowded as it is and we'll probably be out of Europe. We certainly do not need a backup of the backup especially if the guy in question is not very good in his job and is always injured. Che Adams is hardly a world beater. In fact I believe that he's nowhere near to United level. However there's no denying that he's more likely to make the bench then the treatment room which is a great asset to have from a backup