Grinner
Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Ewan Mc just did a frigging Alec Guinness impression the whole time anyway.
It's fantasy made by people who have been licensed to do that. The likes of BioWare for example paid money to LucasArts to make the game in Star Wars universe. Even worse, they have decanonized stuff which they have made themselves (like The Force Unleashed).
In many cases LucasArts has intervened, for example the original plan on Thrawn Trilogy was that the rogue Jedi to be a clone of Obi Wan but Lucas said no, so Zahn had to change that and to make a new Jedi for that. In other cases, like Darth Plagueis novel Lucas himself worked with the author on the book. The Darth Bane trilogy basement was made by Lucas too. It's not that anyone could have write Star Wars stuff, but there were a selected few wgo got licenses to do that.
The shame is that pre Thrawn Trilogy things are very good and they don't contradict each other. After that trilogy things went bad and it was like a crazy race between different authors who'll make the Star Wars characters more powerful than Goku on DragonBallZ (and to be fair, some achieved that, as crazy as it sounds). That part was a no brainer that had to be removed, especially considering that it is anyway shit and it's on the same time as the new movies.
But stories of Naga Sadow, Exar Kun, The Old Republic stories, Darth Bane, Darth Plagueis, Kenobi novel, The Thrawn Trilogy had no need to be changed.
Anyway, I think that it won't have any effect at all. Movies anyway wouldn't have been affected from these stories, and most of the fans will have those stories anyway as their personal canon. There might be a nerd backslash if they without any particular reason decide to change stories from the past though. And if they somehow manage to change the names of Lucas/Leia kids, I guess that people won't be happy. And they too, because less people happy, less money for them.
Ewan Mc just did a frigging Alec Guinness impression the whole time anyway.
He was very good in that time traveling rom-com with Rachel McAdams. Decent flick.Domhnall Gleeson was shite in the few scenes he had in harry potter. May partly be because he was horribly miscast for the role.
He was very good in that time traveling rom-com with Rachel McAdams. Decent flick.
Which movie?He was very good in that time traveling rom-com with Rachel McAdams. Decent flick.
Which movie?
I was thinking that. Yeah he certainly wasnt in itTime Travellers Wife? Which he wasn't it.
I assume you mean Natalie Portman stood out because of some of the more revealing outfits she wore, right? Her acting skills certainly didn't shine through.A shite one at that. To be fair to him though he was the stand-out in an otherwise bland and featureless cast of beige. Him and Natalie Portman..
Me too. I hoped that they'll go a few centuries on the future or a few millenia on the past to do so, but they decided that way. It's asking for trouble IMO.The cast is pretty underwhelming.
Not sure that having some of the old cast in it will work either. It worked pretty well in Star Trek having Spock, but his role was more of a passing on the torch type role than one that was there for any significant meaning. Think I'd have preferred a complete break from the old films and pushed the films into a new direction.
Which movie?
Nah it wasn't time traveler's wife, it was the one with Bill Nighy in it too.
About Time. Good movie. Bill Nighy is in it as well. A good movie to enjoy with your other half. Not that kind of movie that's for women but marketed for both.Which movie?
I think people are rather upset because they're pretty much being told that the EU won't be filmed which is a shame because it has a lot of great stuff. Similar to the TMNT movie with how the turtles look. They're super weird in the trailers. With all the amount of excellent fan art available they instead try to invent the wheel again and the outcome is weird and pretty bad.I don't understand, why are people upset with the de-cannonisation for the extended universe? The books and games will still be there, what difference does it make?
http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/06...ovie?utm_campaign=fbposts&utm_source=facebook
Another spin-off movie announced. I love Star Wars but this is becoming Call Of Duty now. I know that the idea of milking the series was from the beginning, but a movie every year is too much IMO.
Anyway, would be interesting to see what topics will have these two movies. I guess one of them will show us more about Boba Fett (the most one-dimensional character ever after Darth Maul).
Harrison Ford has been injured during the shots for the seventh episode. Apparently he lost concious and had to be sent to the hospital.
He has looked ancient for fecking years now. But he keeps truckin.
He tends to get agitated in social situtations like that where he may have to do a speech, probably nerves. Besides, if I were seventy odd I'd love to be like him! Still seems like he can keep on acting till the end. I do believe he did a lot of his own stunts in the last indy movie.He looked really frail at the Oscars.
He wasn't seduced, he goes from whiny troubled teen to slaughtering a bunch of children with hardly a whimper. Hayden Christiansen completely faily to portray the anguish and indecision and just looks like your average moody teenager.
Was he lied to about needing to be on the dark side to bring people back to life though? Did Obi Wan do it with what's her face or was she just injured by Vader?
He was manipulated. The story of Darth Plagueis the Wise (told from Palpatine on that theatre) was true (though a bit changed in order to appeal more to Anakin). Recently was published a book about him (one of the best ever Star Wars books IMO) where it was confirmed that he was Palpatine's master and indirectly the reason why Anakin was created. Anyway, Palpatine saw that Anakin is struggling with those visions so he told that story to him in order to push him join the dark side. Obviously if Anakin wouldn't join the dark side, he wouldn't injure Padme at all and things would have gone completely different, likely with a much happy ending (always in motion, the future is).
Padme wasn't killed from Vader. Obi Was just healed her there from injuries. She later lost the will to live (a bit ridiculous) but physically she was fine. Just that Anakin went batshit crazy and couldn't realize that he was being played from Palpatine.
Agree about Revenge of the Sith, I think it is ace. Liked it very much (more than Return of the Jedi) despite it's flaws. The novelization (published a month before the movie was released) complements it very well and shows some other scenes with Anakin/Palpatine/Obi-Wan.
I've started Shatterpoint a couple of years ago, but left it after a hundred pages or so. And then never returned to it.Have you read Stover's other Star Wars books? Personally they are my favourites and I don't get at all why he gets so much criticism for it. I've lost all interest in the expanded universe a few years ago, it was just quantity over quality and about making money for me.
Why do droids speak to each other in English? Surely they can communicate silently between each other instead of saying 'get them' out loud.
Also why do they get scared of things? Why would you make a robot that was scared of everything?
I've started Shatterpoint a couple of years ago, but left it after a hundred pages or so. And then never returned to it.
I think that the new books on post Return of the Jedi era are a bit meh and haven't read that much there. However, there are many Star Wars great books. The Thrawn trilogy is super awesome and a must read but the likes of Darth Plagueis, Darth Bane trilogy, Revan, Kenobi are all worthy reading.
The plan is to show my firstborn son the original Star Wars trilogy as soon as possible. If he doesn't like it, he will be left on top of a hill to die.
Wow I have no recollection of saying that.