- Joined
- Apr 5, 2021
- Messages
- 881
Neither.
Correct answer.Rather stick with EtH if those are the two choices.
Why stick with someone who we already know isn't good enough, as opposed to taking a punt on someone who might do well?We might as well keep our current incredibly failing manager. That's my take.
Ahh this took me back!! BrilliantCake.
Potter obviously. Would worry about anyone going for Southgate.
You are just stating your opinions as facts without any arguments.
Correct. Bald is literally bestNeither are as good as our current manager.
That's the most convoluted and reverse-engineered piece of crap argument you'll find in football discussion, which is saying something. You only make that work by fitting the definition of which teams are "shite" and which teams are not to the conclusion you've already reached. Just pure bollocks.
I've followed international tournaments since 1978, always with a special fondness for England. With the sole exception of Euro 96, the past couple of tournaments is the only period in those almost 50 years where England has felt in any way like a proper, serious title contender. You'd think that'd count for something, but apparently that only convinces people that if this is the case the only possible explanation must be that it's so easy that anyone could have achieved that. It's beyond laughable.