peridigm
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2011
- Messages
- 14,508
There are so many good ones for this.Crisis averted!
Thankfully nobody wants to join Liverpool.
""
There are so many good ones for this.Crisis averted!
Thankfully nobody wants to join Liverpool.
There are so many good ones for this.
""
Mount is here to staySo what does our midfield look like if we get Amrabat? Does it mean that Mount is redundant already!
So what does our midfield look like if we get Amrabat? Does it mean that Mount is redundant already!
We’ve literally got the 2nd highest net spend in the league.watching other teams splurge the cash and we have to sell 2 players to get 1? man this club sometimes makes some weird decisions. We probably needed an Amrabat type player than a Mount type but look who we signed first.
I hope we don't wait to lose 2 games before we panic buy again
No need to make a Mount out of a molehill.So what does our midfield look like if we get Amrabat? Does it mean that Mount is redundant already!
Mount will end up playing wide right and wide left in games ETH wants to shut opposition down.Mount can be backup to bruno, also so he doesn't play a ridiculous amount of games again.
Yeah. For many years we’ve had a high net spend. It is arguably a problem in itself when other parts of the club required investment. If we sold more players we could have a higher gross spend.We’ve literally got the 2nd highest net spend in the league.
I think we need both, plus Casemiro and Bruno, for balance and squad depth.So what does our midfield look like if we get Amrabat? Does it mean that Mount is redundant already!
To be fair that's more to do with being incapable of selling effectively than spending more than other clubs.We’ve literally got the 2nd highest net spend in the league.
Our biggest problem is selling players. We’ve given too many average players big contracts. We are struggling to shift players out while the likes of Chelsea are scooping in cash with sales for the likes of Lewis Hall for £35m (looking likely).Yeah. For many years we’ve had a high net spend. It is arguably a problem in itself when other parts of the club required investment. If we sold more players we could have a higher gross spend.
When we are so far behind our competitors, we probably need to have the highest spend regardless of sales for a few windows. Spending smart is better than spending big but is also more difficult.
Our biggest problem is selling players. We’ve given too many average players big contracts. We are struggling to shift players out while the likes of Chelsea are scooping in cash with sales for the likes of Dewsbury Hall for £35m (looking likely).
Sorry Lewis hall.Dewsbury Hall? You sure about that?
It’s a major problem.Our biggest problem is selling players. We’ve given too many average players big contracts. We are struggling to shift players out while the likes of Chelsea are scooping in cash with sales for the likes of Dewsbury Hall for £35m (looking likely).
Mount is nothing like Fred. We don’t have a deeper midfielder to pick the ball up from Casemiro and carry it forward. Fred brought a bit of solidity to the midfield when he can be arsed, Mount is a forward attacker, even a winger at times. I would’ve thought Mount was brought in to provide a bit of competition for the either underperforming or inconsistent attacking midfielders/wingers we’ve got.Mount is Fred's replacement
Fred was not a type of player that EtH wanted. He wanted a Mount type. There is no need to replace Fred as a type. In terms of numbers it was Mount in, Fred out.Mount is nothing like Fred. We don’t have a deeper midfielder to pick the ball up from Casemiro and carry it forward. Fred brought a bit of solidity to the midfield when he can be arsed, Mount is a forward attacker, even a winger at times. I would’ve thought Mount was brought in to provide a bit of competition for the either underperforming or inconsistent attacking midfielders/wingers we’ve got.
We desperately need an experienced box to box or holding midfielder.
Plus as a starter in the tougher games when we might want to go in with a more solid CM alongside Casemiro and move Fernandes or Mount wide instead of the likes of Antony (as Bruno often did last season).Even if we do sign Amrabat I doubt we're going to move away from the Casemiro-Mount-Bruno midfield 3. Moreso a signing for depth I'm guessing
That is basically what we have been doing for the last decade. We have outspent every single club in England. The amount of money we spent on our current team is unbelievable.Yeah. For many years we’ve had a high net spend. It is arguably a problem in itself when other parts of the club required investment. If we sold more players we could have a higher gross spend.
When we are so far behind our competitors, we probably need to have the highest spend regardless of sales for a few windows. Spending smart is better than spending big but is also more difficult.
Mount is nothing like Fred. We don’t have a deeper midfielder to pick the ball up from Casemiro and carry it forward. Fred brought a bit of solidity to the midfield when he can be arsed, Mount is a forward attacker, even a winger at times. I would’ve thought Mount was brought in to provide a bit of competition for the either underperforming or inconsistent attacking midfielders/wingers we’ve got.
We desperately need an experienced box to box or holding midfielder.
That’s not exactly right. We have the highest net spend. But Chelsea and City have higher total spend. Which was the whole point of the post. If we sold players half as well as they do we could easily outspend them. They spend more but sell more so their net spend isn’t as bad as ours.That is basically what we have been doing for the last decade. We have outspent every single club in England. The amount of money we spent on our current team is unbelievable.
I see Amrabat as a version of Eriksen who can run. He's not going to fix any of our defensive midfield issues, but this myth seems to persist in our incredibly informed and intelligent fanbase.Even if we do sign Amrabat I doubt we're going to move away from the Casemiro-Mount-Bruno midfield 3. Moreso a signing for depth I'm guessing
And it is a problem that will take a number of years to correct, if able at all. Big contracts will be here until they’re done.It’s a major problem.
Have you even watched him?! You only need to watch his World Cup matches, or even a highlight reel to see how wrong this post is. But, apparently this intelligent opinion carries more weight than others so it must be right.I see Amrabat as a version of Eriksen who can run. He's not going to fix any of our defensive midfield issues, but this myth seems to persist in our incredibly informed and intelligent fanbase.
I'm guessing you haven't watched him and just looked at his fbref. Amrabat played dm very effectively for Morocco at the World Cup and from what I saw of him for Fiorentina he plays a pretty similar role. A dm doesn't always need to have high tackle volume. The position is much more about intelligent positioning, which Amrabat does have. Rodri's probably the best example of this type of dm, where his defensive numbers aren't particularly outstanding, but if you watch him play it's obvious he's an exceptional player. Carrick was a similar profile when he played for us.I see Amrabat as a version of Eriksen who can run. He's not going to fix any of our defensive midfield issues, but this myth seems to persist in our incredibly informed and intelligent fanbase.
I'm guessing you haven't watched him and just looked at his fbref. Amrabat played dm very effectively for Morocco at the World Cup and from what I saw of him for Fiorentina he plays a pretty similar role. A dm doesn't always need to have high tackle volume. The position is much more about intelligent positioning, which Amrabat does have. Rodri's probably the best example of this type of dm, where his defensive numbers aren't particularly outstanding, but if you watch him play it's obvious he's an exceptional player. Carrick was a similar profile when he played for us.
If you look more in depth at Amrabat's defensive stats, his % of dribblers tackled is extremely high, in the 89th percentile, and his challenges lost is exceptional, ranking in the 96th percentile. This basically means anytime Amrabat actually needs to make a tackle, he will most likely do so successfully. His pure tackling numbers aren't as high because he's not pressing every player like a Fred for example. Instead, he focuses more on maintaining the shape of the team. Casemiro can normally do this while also having high volumes of tackles, but very few dms are capable of combining these, as it takes a combination of positional intelligence and incredible workrate.
His fbref for Fiorentina looks very impressive in terms of his progressive passes and carries, which would be a big benefit imo, because without Eriksen in the team we really struggle here and that's not the type of player Mount is. That being said, ETH seems to want to play a single pivot with both Mount and Bruno playing closer to the strikers for some reason. I don't really understand it tbh and I don't think it's going to work. Even in games not against the big teams, a player like Amrabat playing beside Casemiro would be much more effective imo. The Mount transfer is one I haven't been able to wrap my head around since the very first links. It favours an extremely direct approach.
If this is dependent on the sale of players I’m not too positive of us getting it done.
McTominay doesn’t have any real role or purpose in this team. And Hannibal hasn’t impressed the manager. That leavesI just don't think we need him and that's why we haven't bid for him. We have Casemiro, McTominay, Eriksen, Mount, Bruno, Mainoo and possibly Hannibal. Most teams will be extremely happy with McTominay as a 5th choice midfielder. I just cannot see what value Amrabat can add and how we can give him gametime without sacrificing Mainoo in the process.
McTominay doesn’t have any real role or purpose in this team. And Hannibal hasn’t impressed the manager. That leaves
Casemiro - DM
Bruno - AM
Mainoo - 8
Mount - AM / 8
VDB - crap
Thats one DM and possibly two 8s out which one is more of an AM atm. We definitely should be adding a second DM / playmaker and Amrabat fits as he seems to be more of a playmaker in deep areas than anyone we have even if he’s not rock solid defensively or top class.