Sky Sports Bias or what?

The media has a huge influence. Even now the Onana challenge against Wolves gets brought up which was the first game of last season. There needs to be a re-balance of coverage for United but that only happens by winning and the manager calling stuff out against referees and banning journalists.
It's also due to us being on TV (Sky/TNT) almost more than anyone else, even in out slump. I don't moan about that, it's great as a fan, but that is why there is then more contentious conversation involving united.

Also, we ruined the childhoods so many they have a understandable bitterness haha
 
Don’t think there was anything in our own handball appeal tbh.
 
Bournemouth Fan TV today :lol: Jesus if anybody thinks that their entire approach to covering United isn't to generate utter clickbait and rage among fans of the 91 other clubs just watch today's game.

They have a business model and stick to it and it's so influential in the football narrative that we pretty much never get a huge call. Chances of Bankes ever giving us something again are zero - they are dictating the response.

If they said '"ya hes unlucky a bit but there's contact high up the ankle and the right foot scissors around him so it has to be a red' there is no story. They thrive on United stories, its oxygen for them
 
Bournemouth Fan TV today :lol: Jesus if anybody thinks that their entire approach to covering United isn't to generate utter clickbait and rage among fans of the 91 other clubs just watch today's game.

They have a business model and stick to it and it's so influential in the football narrative that we pretty much never get a huge call. Chances of Bankes ever giving us something again are zero - they are dictating the response.

If they said '"ya hes unlucky a bit but there's contact high up the ankle and the right foot scissors around him so it has to be a red' there is no story. They thrive on United stories, its oxygen for them
100%