Skizzo vs Tuppet - Tactical Draft QF

Who created a better environment for their star player to shine?


  • Total voters
    21
  • Poll closed .
You probably get what I'm saying - and it's a shame, really, as you've built a perfect system for Rivera. But to see the same 4-2-3-1 over and over is not the most exciting prospect for a neutral voter :( Not that it should influence the voting though, just a general observation
 
You probably get what I'm saying - and it's a shame, really, as you've built a perfect system for Rivera. But to see the same 4-2-3-1 over and over is not the most exciting prospect for a neutral voter :( Not that it should influence the voting though, just a general observation

No I completely agree. Especially when other managers are going with less orthodox formations and set ups and doing a phenomenal job setting it around their star player ( @Tuppet for example) and I have the same 4231 we usually see and with marginal changes each time.
 
There's not much flexibility that can be done with Rivera. 4231 is default and Skizzo has nailed it (pains me to say it). I'd rather have had Valderrama than Rivera as a central player.

Ooh Valderrama would have been a fun central player. So many things you could do there.
 
Ooh Valderrama would have been a fun central player. So many things you could do there.
A team that makes Valderrama really stand out?

Barthez
Gravesen Stam Skrtel R. Carlos
Vieira Cambiasso
Lato Valderrama Robben
Henry​
 
A team that makes Valderrama really stand out?

Barthez
Gravesen Stam Skrtel R. Carlos
Vieira Cambiasso
Lato Valderrama Robben
Henry​
Danny Mills or Paul Konchesky instead of Gravesen surely.

Still think it would be more fun to see him in this company:

-------------------------James
McGrath--Ferdinand--David Luiz--Marcelo
-------------------Breitner---Fellaini
Jairzinho---------Valderrama------------Chong
------------------------------Jo

Subs: Berry, Smalling, Witsel, Willian, Sané, Wallace
Pornstar: Assou-Ekotto